|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ochsner Clinic and Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Address reprint requests to: Michael A. Finan, MD Ochsner Clinic 1514 Jefferson Highway New Orleans, LA 70121 E-mail: mfinan{at}ochsner.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 187 women who had surgery for known or suspected gynecologic malignancies during 1996 and 1997, and 179 were included in the present study. Information on each womans comorbid medical conditions, surgical history, surgicopathologic cancer diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgical procedures, and postoperative complications was collected and analyzed.
Results: Women with two or more comorbid medical conditions had significantly longer mean hospital stays (8.62 days) than those with none or one comorbid medical condition (6.43 days) (P < .001). Women with two or more postoperative complications had significantly longer mean hospital stays (11.88 days) than those with none or one complication (6.02 days) (P < .001). Women with two or more postoperative complications also had significantly more comorbid medical conditions (mean 2.5) than those with none or one complication (mean 1.7) (P < .001). The American Society of Anesthesiologists class also was a significant predictor of postoperative complications and length of hospitalization. Age over 60 years also was associated with statistically significant increase in comorbid medical conditions and significantly longer hospitalizations.
Conclusion: Our findings indicated that certain high-risk patients can be identified before hospital admission based on comorbid medical conditions. Certain risk indices, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score, also can predict postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. This information can be used to coordinate preoperative and postoperative hospital care and be a reference for certain future disease management systems.
For many years staging systems for gynecologic cancers have been valuable for determining prognoses and survival rates. Each classification system uses many anatomic criteria. An individuals comorbid medical conditions largely have been ignored among those classification systems. During the past few years, several studies of comorbid medical conditions or symptomatology as indicators of survival and morbidity in prostate cancer,1,2 cervical cancer,3 and breast cancer4,5 have been published. A review by Piccirillo and Feinstein6 suggested that in certain cancers, such as lung, larynx, prostate, and rectal, the tumor-node-metastasis cancer staging system alone is imprecise for prognostic estimates and that symptoms and comorbidities could improve accuracy.
No study to date focused on the relationship between gynecologic oncology surgical patients, comorbid conditions, and influence on postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Such a relationship could be valuable for identifying high-risk patients who might need lengthy hospitalizations or tertiary care. Our hypothesis was that comorbid medical conditions can predict length of hospital stay and number of complications. By identifying those patients, gynecologists can coordinate high-risk patients hospital care with primary care physicians, rehabilitation services, nursing personnel, and intensive care specialists.
We also were interested in learning whether a preoperative risk index could be used to determine which gynecologic oncology patients were at high risk of postoperative complications and lengthy hospitalizations. We selected the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system because it is a well-established risk assessment tool that has been used since the 1940s to evaluate surgical patients,79 is an established part of the operative record, and is always used with patients who have surgery at our hospital. However, the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system mainly focuses on risk of perioperative death and on predicting primary anesthetic death, whereas we wanted to know whether that system can predict postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comorbid medical conditions were defined as those that existed at the time of surgical admission. Any condition that developed during hospitalization after surgery was classified as a postoperative complication and not included as a comorbid medical condition. To keep classification simple, comorbid conditions were not differentiated by severity; each condition was counted as one comorbid condition. For example, a womans comorbid conditions included hypertension, type II diabetes, and high cholesterol; another womans comorbid condition was history of arthritis. The first woman had three comorbid conditions, and the second only had one. Length of hospital stay was calculated in days, using day of admission as hospital day 1. American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications were taken from the operative record in accordance with guidelines of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.8,9 Postoperative complications were not differentiated by severity; each complication was counted individually.
Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 9.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Categoric variables were analyzed using
2, and means were compared using independent t test or analysis of variance when appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to delineate independent predictors of hospital stay and postoperative complications. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system also was a good predictor of length of hospitalization and incidence of postoperative complications. Other studies evaluated its usefulness for predicting outcomes such as perioperative death10 or anesthetic death,7,11 with mixed results. That classification system, as an indicator of hospitalization and complications, gives surgeons another preoperative risk assessment tool that is easy to understand and use, and indicates that preoperative risk indices can predict who is at high risk for surgical complications and lengthy hospitalizations. In further research we should design a system to rate gynecologic oncology surgical patients at admission, similar to scoring systems such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II,12 which were created to evaluate patients on admission to intensive care units.
Our finding of greater length of hospitalization and higher incidence of comorbid medical conditions for women over age 60 years agreed with results of previous studies.13 Physicians who practice in community hospitals or rural areas also can use this system to evaluate patients and decide on determination for consultation or referral. Solid data on certain high-risk surgical patients and lengths of hospitalizations also can be used in certain disease management systems being created by insurance companies and other health care providers.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 28, 2000. Received in revised form November 27, 2000. Accepted December 7, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Fowler JE Jr, Terrell FL, Renfroe DL. Co-morbidities and survival of men with localized prostate cancer treated with surgery or radiation therapy. J Urol 1996;156:17148.[Medline]
3. Peipert JF, Wells CK, Schwartz PE, Feinstein AR. Prognostic value of clinical variables in invasive cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:74651.
4. Satariano WA, Ragland DR. The effect of comorbidity on 3-year survival of women with primary breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:10410.
5. West DW, Satariano WA, Ragland DR, Hiatt RA. Comorbidity and breast cancer survival: A comparison between black and white women. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:4139.[Medline]
6. Piccirillo JF, Feinstein AR. Clinical symptoms and comorbidity: Significance for the prognostic classification of cancer. Cancer 1996;77:83442.[Medline]
7. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 1961;178:26166.
8. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: A study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:23943.[Medline]
9. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesia 1941;2:28184.
10. Farrow SC, Fowkes FGR, Lunn JN, Robertson IB, Samuel P. Epidemiology in anaesthesia. II: Factors affecting mortality in hospital. Br J Anaesth 1982;54:8117.
11. Goldstein A Jr, Keats AS. The risk of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1970;33:13043.[Medline]
12. Van Le L, Fakhry S, Walton LA, Moore DH, Fowler WC, Rutledge R. Use of the APACHE II scoring system to determine mortality of gynecologic oncology patients in the intensive care unit. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:535.[Abstract]
13. Yancik R, Havlik RJ, Wesley MN, Ries L, Lovy S, Rossi WK, et al. Cancer and comorbidity in older patients: A descriptive profile. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:399412.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Giannice, E. Foti, A. Poerio, E. Marana, S. Mancuso, and G. Scambia Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality in Elderly Gynecological Oncological Patients ("=" BORDER="0">70 Years) by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classes Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2004; 11(2): 219 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |