|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky.
Address reprint requests to: Douglas D. Taylor, PhD, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 511 South Floyd Street, MDR 420, Louisville, KY 40202, E-mail: ddtaylor{at}juno.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Sera from the arterial cord blood from 38 SGA infants were analyzed for apolipoprotein A-I level, total lipid content, and distribution of those lipids as triglycerides, diglycerides, free fatty acids, and phospholipids. Comparisons were made between appropriate for gestational age (AGA) controls (n = 25), SGA infants with a ponderal index below the tenth percentile (SGA I, n = 20), and SGA infants with a ponderal index above the tenth percentile (SGA II, n =18).
Results: Total cord serum lipid content was markedly decreased in all SGA infants compared with AGA infants (2.8 times lower). Although SGA infants showed total lipid concentration decreases, SGA I and SGA II infants showed distinct characteristics. Infants in the SGA I group had higher triglyceride levels (1.8 times higher) and lower free fatty acid levels (1.4 times lower), compared with AGA infants (P < .001). The lipid subclass distribution in SGA II infants was not significantly different from that in AGA infants, with the exception of an increase in triglyceride concentrations (1.3 times higher). Although the 22-kD placenta-derived apolipoprotein A-I was similar in all groups, the level of fetal liverderived 28-kD apolipoprotein A-I was 6.5 times lower in SGA I infants than in AGA or SGA II infants (P < .001).
Conclusion: The SGA I infants appeared to have impaired utilization of circulating triglycerides, consistent with peripheral adipose depletion. Diminished fetus-derived apolipoprotein A-I levels with normal levels of placenta-derived apolipoprotein A-I levels might indicate a defect in the production or secretion of apolipoproteins associated with growth restriction.
Growth appears to be the best indicator of long-term fetal well-being and might be associated with development of abnormal states later in life.1,2 Distinct from their appropriately grown counterparts, growth-restricted fetuses have physiologic characteristics that are believed to alter permanently the development and metabolic function of organs.3 In addition to increased morbidity and mortality, growth restriction has been associated neonatally with hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, polycythemia, and thrombocytopenia.4,5 Hypoinsulinemia, decreased thyrotropin levels, and diminished insulin-like growth factorI have been described in small for gestational age (SGA) infants.6
Numerous confusing definitions have been used to describe infants and fetuses in the lower percentiles of growth. The term small for gestational age is used to describe infants and fetuses below the tenth percentile of growth for gestational age.7 In fetal growth restriction (FGR), an abnormal process limits the rate or extent of fetal growth, and application of the term aids in the identification of infants at risk for perinatal complications.8,9 Although the terms relate to distinct processes, SGA and FGR often are used synonymously. Small for gestational age infants represent a mixed group of patients including constitutionally small, but otherwise normal, infants as well as growth-restricted infants. One method used to differentiate SGA infants is the ponderal index, which identifies infants with body habitus consistent with decreased peripheral fat deposition.10
Physiologic differences have been noted in growth-restricted infants. Intrauterine amino acid disturbances similar to the biochemical changes seen in postnatal protein-deprived states have been detected.11 Protein metabolism defects and altered lipid metabolism also have been described. Studies12,13 have suggested that deficiencies in essential fatty acids might be present in growth-restricted infants. Infusion of essential fatty acids in women with FGR produced a marked gain in fetal biparietal diameter and estimated weight.13 Some studies14,15 showed SGA infants to be hypertriglyceridemic; however, those cases were linked with hypoxemia and hypoinsulinemia.16
Specific changes in lipid metabolism are associated with pregnancy. Normal plasma triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol levels increase throughout pregnancy, with significantly elevated values after week 25. On the basis of those observations, apolipoprotein levels were determined in cord blood, and factors affecting lipid and lipoprotein levels were reviewed.17,18 The high-density lipoprotein (HDL)/apolipoprotein A and apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A ratios were found to be greater in the FGR group, primarily because of a decrease in apolipoprotein A level.
In this study, we identified 38 infants below the tenth percentile for growth based on gestational age. Those infants were subdivided further into two groups based on ponderal index, to examine whether lipid metabolism differences could be detected between those two distinct subsets, comparing markers of lipid transport and metabolism.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To measure the total lipid concentration in the serum samples, serum (0.5 mL) was extracted by a modified procedure of Bligh and Dyer,19 using a two-step extraction with chloroform:methanol:water. The lipids from the serum were concentrated by drying under nitrogen gas at 4C, the serum lipid fractions were weighed, and the three groups were compared.
Subsequently, 500 µg of lipid extracted from each sample was separated by thin-layer chromatography, using a silica gel G plate and a mobile phase of chloroform:methanol:water (1:1:0.2). After separation, the lipid spots were visualized using iodine vapor, and those corresponding to phospholipids, free fatty acids, diglycerides, and triglycerides (based on simultaneously run standards) were scraped from the plate. After elution, each lipid group was quantitated by weighing and the mean (± standard deviation [SD]) of duplicate samples was calculated.
Apolipoprotein A-I levels were analyzed by western immunoblot. Albumin was removed from serum by absorption with Affi-Gel Blue (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). Serum proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions on a 14% acrylamide gel by the method of Laemmli20 and were transferred electrophoretically onto nitrocellulose membranes for western immunoblot analysis.21 The blots were probed with rabbit antiapolipoprotein A-I polyclonal antiserum (Accurate Scientific, Union, NY). The membranes subsequently were incubated with swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G, conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. The bound complexes were viewed by enhanced chemiluminescense (ECL; Amersham Life Sciences, Arlington Heights, IL) and immunoreactive bands were compared with prestained molecular weight standards for determination of molecular weight. The levels of the 22- and 28-kD apolipoprotein A-I bands were quantitated by densitometry.
To determine whether the differences observed were statistically significant, mean and SD values for the various components were determined for each group. With the use of InStat software (Graph-Pad, San Diego, CA), differences in values between controls and the SGA groups were evaluated by analysis of variance, with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests applied when there were significantly different results. The correlation of preeclampsia, smoking, and low ponderal indices was analyzed by Fisher exact test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean (± SD) birth weight for the control group was 3509.6 ± 320.5 g. The mean birth weight for SGA I infants was 2075.3 ± 530.7 g and for SGA II infants was 2270.7 ± 336.4 g. Differences in birth weights were highly significant among the groups (P < .001), with birth weights in the SGA I and SGA II groups both different from those in the control group (P < .001).
Charts of infants and mothers in the SGA groups were reviewed for differences in maternal smoking, presence of hypertensive disorders, oligohydramnios, and prolonged or complicated neonatal hospital course. Twelve of 20 SGA I mothers had hypertensive complications, compared with six of 18 SGA II mothers (P = .15). Eight of 12 SGA I hypertensive women had preeclampsia or eclampsia, whereas only three of six SGA II mothers had preeclampsia. The remainder of the complications were gestational hypertensions. Only one of 25 controls was preeclamptic (P = .006 versus SGA I mothers). Only one pregnancy was complicated by oligohydramnios, and that pregnancy was in the SGA I group. There were no statistical differences in prevalence of smoking or neonatal course among the three groups. One neonatal death occurred in the SGA II group; however, the infant was determined postmortem to have severe congenital central nervous system anomalies, not diagnosed antenatally.
Sera from control infants had a mean (± SD) total lipid content of 526 ± 198 µg/mL, compared with the SGA I group, which had a mean serum total lipid concentration of 205 ± 182 µg/mL, and the SGA II group, which had a mean concentration of 173 ± 82 µg/mL (2.8 times higher). The difference between the two SGA groups and controls was statistically significant (P < .001). The difference in levels of total lipid between the SGA I and SGA II groups was not significant. Regression analysis showed no discernible relationship within the SGA groups between total lipid concentrations and gestational age or birth weight.
Differences in the composition of serum lipids between groups are shown in Figure 1
. Free fatty acid, triglyceride, diglyceride, and phospholipid levels were analyzed and values were compared between groups. All were expressed as percentages of total serum lipids. No significant differences were detected in the diglyceride or phospholipid populations between groups. However, significant differences were present in the free fatty acid and triglyceride fractions.
|
The distribution of serum lipids in control and SGA II infants was similar, with only the difference in triglyceride concentrations being statistically significant (P < .05) (1.3 times higher). In terms of relative percentages of total lipids, triglycerides were elevated and free fatty acids were decreased in the SGA I group, as compared with controls and the SGA II group, and these differences were statistically significant (P < .001 for both comparisons). In terms of absolute lipid values, both free fatty acid and triglyceride levels were significantly decreased in SGA I infants, compared with the AGA group (P < .001). The differences in those absolute values between SGA I (elevated triglyceride and decreased free fatty acid levels) and SGA II infants remained statistically significant (P < .01).
Studies showed 22-kD (placenta-derived) and 28-kD (fetal liverderived) forms of apolipoprotein A-I to be associated with fetal tissues.18 The comparison of relative quantities of those apolipoprotein A-I proteins is presented in Figure 2
. Quantitation with the bands resulting from densitometric analysis indicated similar levels of 22-kD apolipoprotein A-I between groups; however, a significant difference was observed between the levels of 28-kD apolipoprotein A-I in SGA I versus control or SGA II infants (P < .001). The SGA I group exhibited a decrease of approximately 6.5 times in the level of fetal liverderived apolipoprotein A-I, compared with controls.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of this study showed the heterogeneity of those infants labeled as SGA. The lipid profile of the SGA I group indicated markedly diminished fetal liverderived apolipoprotein A-I levels and decreased absolute total lipid levels; however, at relative concentrations, triglycerides were elevated and free fatty acids lowered. Those alterations are consistent with an inability to hydrolyze circulating triglycerides, leading to diminished peripheral adipose deposition. The lower free fatty acid levels in the absence of adequate peripheral adipose deposition might be consistent with depletion secondary to use as an alternate fuel source or might be simply a reflection of a more severe degree of uteroplacental insufficiency in that group. The decreased liver-derived apolipoprotein A-I levels, with similar placental apolipoprotein A-I levels, suggest impaired hepatic synthesis or secretion, and the finding is consistent with reports of low HDL and limited ability to metabolize very low density lipoproteins and to clear intravenous lipids in SGA infants early in the neonatal period.17
A limitation of this study was the failure to examine separately the hypertensive group with regard to etiology of growth restriction. A significant percentage of the SGA I mothers were preeclamptic (eight of 20 versus one of 25 controls, P = .006). Three of 18 mothers in the SGA II group were preeclamptic (P = .29 versus controls). The expected placental vascular changes in those patients might explain the significantly decreased free fatty acid levels in the SGA I group. Hypertensive pregnancies and their effects on endogenous fetal lipid metabolism will be examined in future studies.
These results show that SGA infants with a ponderal index below the tenth percentile have cord serum lipid characteristics distinct from similarly small but appropriately proportioned infants (SGA II group). The lipid values of the SGA I group indicated a diminished ability to deposit serum triglycerides in sufficient amounts to provide adipose stores, diminished levels of available free fatty acids, and impaired formation or secretion of apolipoprotein A-I, all of which are critical in the transition to neonatal life. Because of the risk of fetal and neonatal death, and the link with other disease states later in life for infants in the lower ranges of fetal growth, it is essential to determine the nature of the factors leading to low birth weight. Infants in that broad classification show wide ranges of metabolic impairment, knowledge of which is important for optimal neonatal outcome.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 13, 1998. Received in revised form September 28, 1998. Accepted October 15, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Williams MC, OBrien WF, Spellacy WN. Cerebral palsy, perinatal depression and low ponderal index. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996;38:6617.[Medline]
3. Hales CN. Metabolic consequences of intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1997;423:1847.[Medline]
4. Mello G, Parretti E, Mecacci F, Lucchetti R, Cianciulli D, Lagazio C, et al. Anthropometric characteristics of full-term infants: Effects of varying degrees of "normal" glucose metabolism. J Perinat Med 1997;25:197204.[Medline]
5. Daniel SS, Stark RI, Myers MM, Tropper PJ, Kim YI. Blood pressure and HR in the fetal lamb: Relationship to hypoglycemia, hypoxemia, and growth restriction. Am J Physiol 1996;271:R1415R1421.
6. Nieto-Diaz A, Villar J, Matorras-Weinig R, Valenzuela-Ruiz P. Intrauterine growth retardation at term: Association between anthropometric and endocrine parameters. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:12731.[Medline]
7. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87: 1638.[Abstract]
8. Seeds JW, Peng T. Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: Is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:65869.[Medline]
9. Williams MC, OBrien WF. A comparison of birth weight and weight/length ratio for gestation as correlates of perinatal morbidity. J Perinatol 1997;17:34650.[Medline]
10. Spencer JA, Chang TC, Crook D, Proudler A, Felton CV, Robson SC, et al. Third trimester fetal growth and measures of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in umbilical venous blood at term. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;76:F21F25.
11. Economides DL, Nicolaides KH, Gahl WA, Bernardini I, Bottoms S, Evans M. Cordocentesis in the diagnosis of intrauterine starvation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;4:10048.
12. Vilbergson G, Samsioe G, Wennergren M, Karlsson K. Essential fatty acids in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth retardation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991;36:27786.[Medline]
13. Zhang L. The effects of essential fatty acid preparations in the treatment of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Perinatol 1997;14:5357.[Medline]
14. Kumar A, Gupta A, Malhorta VK, Agarwal PS, Thirupuram S, Gaind B. Cord blood lipid levels in low birth weight newborns. Indian Pediatr 1989;26:5714.[Medline]
15. Matorras R, Perteagudo L, Nieto A, Sanjurjo P. Intrauterine growth retardation and plasma fatty acids in the mother and the fetus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;57:18993.[Medline]
16. Economides DL, Crook D, Nicolaides KH. Investigation of hypertriglyceridemia in small for gestational age fetuses. Fetal Ther 1988;3:16572.[Medline]
17. Munoz A, Uberos J, Molina A, Valenzuela A, Cano D, Ruiz C, et al. Relationship of blood rheology to lipoprotein profile during normal pregnancies and those with intrauterine growth retardation. J Clin Pathol 1995;48:5714.
18. Richardson B, Palgunachari MN, Anantharamaiah GM, Richards RG, Azrolan N, Wiginton D, et al. Human placental tissue expresses a novel 22.7 kDa apolipoprotein A-I-like protein. Biochemistry 1996;35:75805.[Medline]
19. Gercel-Taylor C, Doering DL, Kraemer FB, Taylor DD. Aberrations in normal systemic lipid metabolism in ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 1996;60:3541.[Medline]
20. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:6805.[Medline]
21. Katsanis WA, Shields LB, Spinnato JA, Gercel-Taylor C, Taylor DD. Immune recognition of endometrial tumor antigens induced by multiparity. Gynecol Oncol 1998;70:339.[Medline]
22. Cole TJ, Henson GL, Tremble JM, Colley NV. Birthweight for length: Ponderal index, body mass index or Benn index. Ann Hum Biol 1997;24:28998.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Nelson, D. J. Freeman, N. Sattar, F. D. Johnstone, and R. S. Lindsay IGF-1 and Leptin Associate With Fetal HDL Cholesterol at Birth: Examination in Offspring of Mothers With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes, November 1, 2007; 56(11): 2705 - 2709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |