Correction
for
Reeves et al., Obstet Gynecol 109 (6) 1286-1294.
Correction
for
Goldenberg et al., Obstet Gynecol 109 (2) 392-401.
Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:936
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Corrections
In "Contraceptive Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Devices After Abortion: A Decision Analysis" by M. F. Reeves, K. J. Smith, and M. D. Creinin (Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1286–1294), Figures 2 and 3 contain errors. Due to a production error, an incorrect version of Figure 2 was published showing horizontal lines extending from the left of the black bars. The corrected figure is reprinted here. Due to an author error, in Figure 3, the horizontal and vertical axis labels were switched. The horizontal axis should read, "Expulsion, immediate insertion (%)," and the vertical axis should read, "Failure to return, delayed insertion (%)." The corrected figure is reprinted here.
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2 This tornado diagram shows the results of the one-way sensitivity analysis for each variable. The base case is represented by the dashed vertical line. The bar represents the change in outcome over the full range allowed for that variable. The left and right values in parentheses represent the variable values at the left and right ends, respectively, of the horizontal bar. IUD, intrauterine device.
Reeves. Decision Analysis of Postabortal IUD Insertion. Obstet Gynecol 2007.
|
|
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3 Two-way sensitivity analysis: expulsion and failure to return. The plane of the two-way sensitivity analysis shows the expected number of pregnancies prevented by immediate insertion compared with delayed insertion in the first year for any two values of expulsion and failure to return. The dashed lines indicate the one-way sensitivity analyses in the base case for each variable. The intersection of these lines shows the result in the base case, 52 pregnancies prevented by immediate insertion.
Reeves. Decision Analysis of Postabortal IUD Insertion. Obstet Gynecol 2007.
|
|
In "Fetal Fibronectin and Adverse Infant Outcomes in a Predominantly Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected African Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial" by R. L. Goldenberg, W. W. Andrews, I. Hoffman, W. Fawzi, M. Valentine, A. Young, et al (Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:392–401), the funding code for Harvard University in the footnote on page 392, U01-AI-480006, is incorrect. The correct funding code is U01-AI-048006. The authors regret this error.
doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000267202.78588.ac
