|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, Cambridge; 2Institute of Medical Genetics, Yorkhill National Health Service Trust, Glasgow; 3Department of Public Health, Greater Glasgow National Health Service Board, Glasgow; 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Glasgow University, Glasgow; and 5Information & Statistics Division, Common Services Agency, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of 8,483 women attending for prenatal care in southern Scotland between 1998 and 2000. The risk of delivering a small for gestational age infant, delivering preterm, and stillbirth were related to maternal serum levels of PAPP-A and AFP.
RESULTS: Women with a low PAPP-A were not more likely to have elevated levels of AFP. Compared with women with a normal PAPP-A and a normal AFP, the odds ratio for delivering a small for gestational age infant for women with a high AFP was 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51.6), for women with a low PAPP-A was 2.8 (95% CI 2.04.0), and for women with both a high AFP and a low PAPP-A was 8.5 (95% CI 3.620.0). The odds ratio for delivering preterm for women with a high AFP was 1.8 (95% CI 1.32.7), for women with a low PAPP-A was 1.9 (95% CI 1.32.7), and for women with both a low PAPP-A and a high AFP was 9.9 (95% CI 4.422.0). These interactions were statistically significant for both outcomes (P = .03 and .04, respectively). There was a nonsignificant trend toward a similar interaction in relation to stillbirth risk. Of the women with the combination of a low PAPP-A and high AFP, 32.1% (95% CI 15.952.4) delivered a low birth weight infant.
CONCLUSION: Low maternal serum levels of PAPP-A between 10 and 14 weeks and high levels of AFP between 15 and 21 weeks gestation are synergistically associated with adverse perinatal outcome.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
It has been appreciated for many years that, in the absence of congenital abnormality, high maternal serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the second trimester of pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome.8 AFP is the major fetal oncotic protein and, when the fetus is structurally normal, high maternal circulating levels are thought to reflect a defect in placentation. It is not yet known, however, whether the placental defect associated with increased placental permeability to AFP is related to the activity of the IGF system. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between low PAPP-A, high AFP, and intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth, and stillbirth.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Maternal levels of PAPP-A were measured from blood obtained at the time of the first prenatal visit (1014 weeks) as part of the Combined Ultrasound and Biochemical Screening study. Maternal levels of AFP were determined by two methods. First, we performed record linkage of the Combined Ultrasound and Biochemical Screening database to the database of the laboratory information management system for the prenatal screening program of the West of Scotland Regional Genetics Service of the Institute of Medical Genetics in Glasgow. Second, part of the cohort was followed up by manual retrieval of the case notes, and the AFP level was obtained directly from the case record. PAPP-A was assayed between 10 and 14 weeks gestation and AFP between 15 and 21 weeks. The outcome of the pregnancy was ascertained by linkage of the Combined Ultrasound and Biochemical Screening database to the Scottish Morbidity Record10 and the Scottish Stillbirth and Infant Death Enquiry.11 The Scottish Morbidity Record is a national register of perinatal outcome data,10 and the Scottish Stillbirth and Infant Death Enquiry is a national register that routinely classifies all perinatal deaths in Scotland.11 The Scottish Stillbirth and Infant Death Enquiry has data on 100% of registered stillbirths,11 and the Scottish Morbidity Record contains data on 99.6% of certified births.10 The record linkage and the details of the other data sources and definitions are described in detail elsewhere.6,12 The study cohort (N = 8,483) for the current analysis was defined by women who participated in the Combined Ultrasound and Biochemical Screening study, who had both PAPP-A and AFP results documented, and who could be linked to the Scottish Morbidity Record where singleton birth occurred at or after 24 weeks gestation.
Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined on the basis of centiles derived from the cohort, and preterm birth was defined as delivery before 37 completed weeks of gestation. Socioeconomic status was estimated on the basis of the postal code of the mother's residence, according to Carstairs socioeconomic-deprivation categories (based on 1991 Census data on car ownership, employment status, number of occupants per household room, and social class within postal-code sectors of residence that contain, on average, about 1,600 residents).13 Higher scores indicate residence within areas of greater deprivation.
Maternal serum levels of PAPP-A and AFP were expressed as multiples of the median (MoM) for gestational age, as is conventional for biochemical indices in pregnancy that vary with week of gestation. Because PAPP-A and AFP levels vary inversely with maternal weight, MoM were corrected for maternal weight using reciprocal-linear regression. This is widely employed in prenatal screening and is described in detail elsewhere.14 Separate PAPP-A MoM were estimated for smokers, because PAPP-A is reduced by 15% among smokers.9 Low PAPP-A was defined as the lowest 5% of values for gestational age (
0.4 MoM), and high AFP was defined as the top 5% of values for gestational age (
1.7 MoM). Univariate comparison of continuous variables was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical data using the Fisher exact test. All P values were 2-tailed. Statistical significance was assumed at P < .05. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.15 Cases with missing data on covariates were dropped from the multivariate analysis. Interaction terms were assessed using the likelihood ratio test. All statistical analyses were performed using the Stata 8 software package (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Low PAPP-A was associated with an increased risk of delivering an SGA infant, preterm birth, and stillbirth (Table 2). An elevated AFP was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and stillbirth (Table 2). Women with a low level of PAPP-A were not at increased risk of having a high AFP (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91.9). Adjusting each factor for the other was without material effect on the strength of associations (Table 3). Similarly adjusting for maternal characteristics had a minimal effect on the strength of the associations (Table 3).
|
|
We then studied outcome for high AFP and low PAPP-A, either singly or in combination, with reference to women with normal values of both AFP and PAPP-A (this is a different referent category from Table 3 and thus odds ratios differ slightly from Table 3). The odds ratio for delivering a small for gestational age infant for women with a high AFP was 0.9 (95% CI 0.51.6), for women with a low PAPP-A was 2.8 (95% CI 2.04.0), and for women with both a high AFP and a low PAPP-A was 8.5 (95% CI 3.620.0). The odds ratio for delivering preterm for women with a high AFP was 1.8 (95% CI 1.32.7), for women with a low PAPP-A was 1.9 (95% CI 1.32.7), and for women with both a low PAPP-A and a high AFP was 9.9 (95% CI 4.422.0). The odds ratio for antepartum stillbirth for women with a high AFP was 2.5 (95% CI 0.610.9), for women with a low PAPP-A was 2.2 (95% CI 0.59.7), and for women with both a low PAPP-A and a high AFP was 36.7 (95% CI 8.0167.6). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of PAPP-A, AFP, and maternal characteristics in predicting adverse outcome is shown in Table 4. There were statistically significant positive interactions (Fig. 1) between PAPP-A and AFP in the risk of delivering a SGA infant (P = .03), preterm birth (P = .04) and a trend toward a positive interaction in the risk of stillbirth (P = .14). Of the women with the combination of a low PAPP-A and high AFP, 32.1% (95% CI 15.952.4) delivered a low birth weight infant.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many previous studies had shown that high maternal levels of the fetal oncotic protein, AFP, were associated with an increased risk of complications in later pregnancy.8 It was not apparent, however, whether PAPP-A was a marker for the same placental defect that leads to high rates of placental transfer of AFP. The present study had 3 major findings. First, we show that women who had low levels of PAPP-A were not more likely to have elevated levels of AFP in the second trimester of pregnancy. This suggests that the pathophysiologic process leading to high placental transfer rates of AFP is not related to the IGF system, insofar as it can be assessed by circulating levels of PAPP-A. Second, we show that adjustment for the levels of PAPP-A had a minimal effect on the strength of association between AFP and adverse outcome, and vice versa. If low levels of PAPP-A and high levels of AFP were markers of the same underlying defect in placental function, it would have been anticipated that adjustment of 1 factor for the level of the other would have resulted in a weaker association. The lack of an effect of such adjustment suggests that low PAPP-A and high AFP are consequences of distinct processes and that extreme levels indicate different aspects of placental dysfunction. Finally, we show the combination of a low PAPP-A and a high AFP was synergistically associated with adverse outcome. This indicates that the consequences of the 2 underlying processes must interact. These clinical observations indicate complexity in the placental determinants of adverse perinatal outcome and underline the importance of understanding the biology of trophoblast function in early pregnancy as a determinant of complications in late pregnancy.
The combination of low PAPP-A and high AFP is not likely to be clinically useful as a means of population-based screening to identify women at high risk of pregnancy complications. Relatively few women will have the combination of a low PAPP-A and a high AFP. Consequently, the sensitivity of this test will be low and would not, in itself, justify population-based screening for these outcomes. However, maternal serum levels of PAPP-A and AFP are used in Down syndrome screening, and inevitably, this process will identify women who have the combination of both a low PAPP-A and a high AFP. Women with this combination had a 32.1% risk of delivering a low birth weight neonate (< 2,500 g), a composite outcome of poor growth and preterm birth. The current data justify very close surveillance of these women, because they have a high absolute risk of adverse outcome. Serial umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry may be the preferred method of surveillance, because its use has been shown to reduce perinatal mortality in high-risk pregnancies.17
The data sources employed in the present study also included measurement of the free ß subunit of human chorionic gonadotrophin in the first trimester of pregnancy and human chorionic gonadotrophin in the second. We did not analyze whether these factors were associated with adverse outcome, because previous studies have shown the former is not independently associated with adverse outcome,2 and the latter is only weakly associated.18 Moreover, the number of cases in the present study were insufficient to study third- or fourth-order interactions or interactions associated with more extreme values of PAPP-A or AFP.
In conclusion, we show that low PAPP-A and high AFP synergistically predict preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction. We speculate that the synergistic predictive ability of these tests reflects the combined effect of 2 independent pathophysiologic processes in early placental development.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Corresponding author: Gordon C. S. Smith, MD, PhD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, Rosie Maternity Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2SW, United Kingdom; e-mail: gcss2{at}cam.ac.uk.
doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000191302.79560.d8
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Smith GC, Stenhouse EJ, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Cameron AD, Connor JM. Early pregnancy levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein a and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth, preeclampsia, and stillbirth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:17627.
3. Dugoff L, Hobbins JC, Malone FD, Porter TF, Luthy D, Comstock CH, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: a population-based screening study (the FASTER Trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:144651.[Medline]
4. Krantz D, Goetzl L, Simpson JL, Thom E, Zachary J, Hallahan TW, et al. Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:14528.[Medline]
5. Smith GC, Stenhouse EJ, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Cameron AD, Connor JM. Early pregnancy origins of low birth weight. Nature 2002;417:916.[Medline]
6. Smith GC, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Connor JM, et al. First-trimester placentation and the risk of antepartum stillbirth. JAMA 2004;292:224954.
7. Conover CA, Bale LK, Overgaard MT, Johnstone EW, Laursen UH, Fuchtbauer EM, et al. Metalloproteinase pregnancy-associated plasma protein A is a critical growth regulatory factor during fetal development. Development 2004;131:118794.
8. Waller DK, Lustig LS, Smith AH, Hook EB. Alpha-fetoprotein: a biomarker for pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology 1993;4:4716.[Medline]
9. Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Cameron AD, McBride E, Connor JM. Combined ultrasound and biochemical screening for Down's syndrome in the first trimester: a Scottish multicentre study. BJOG 2002;109:66776.[Medline]
10. Cole SK. Scottish maternity and neonatal records. In: Chalmers I, McIlwaine GM, editors. Perinatal audit and surveillance. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 1980. p. 3951.
11. Information and Statistics Division NHS Scotland. Scottish perinatal and infant mortality report 2000. Edinburgh (UK): ISD Scotland Publications; 2001.
12. Smith GC, Wood AM, Pell JP, White IR, Crossley JA, Dobbie R. Second-trimester maternal serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein and the subsequent risk of sudden infant death syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004;351:97886.
13. McLoone P, Boddy FA. Deprivation and mortality in Scotland, 1981 and 1991. BMJ 1994;309:146570.
14. Neveux LM, Palomaki GE, Larrivee DA, Knight GJ, Haddow JE. Refinements in managing maternal weight adjustment for interpreting prenatal screening results. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:11159.[Medline]
15. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
16. Laursen LS, Overgaard MT, Soe R, Boldt HB, Sottrup-Jensen L, Giudice LC, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) cleaves insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-5 independent of IGF: implications for the mechanism of IGFBP-4 proteolysis by PAPP-A. FEBS Lett 2001;504:3640.[Medline]
17. Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD000073.
18. Walton DL, Norem CT, Schoen EJ, Ray GT, Colby CJ. Second-trimester serum chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and complications and outcome of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999;341:20338.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. M. Reddy Prediction and Prevention of Recurrent Stillbirth Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2007; 110(5): 1151 - 1164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Mizejewski Physiology of Alpha-Fetoprotein as a Biomarker for Perinatal Distress: Relevance to Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2007; 232(8): 993 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |