Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;106:340-344
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Anna, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jasonni, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by D'Anna, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jasonni, V. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Basic Science
Right arrow Hypertension and PIH

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Plasma Adiponectin Concentration in Early Pregnancy and Subsequent Risk of Hypertensive Disorders

Rosario D'Anna, MD, Giovanni Baviera, PhD, Francesco Corrado, MD, Domenico Giordano, MD, Antonino Di Benedetto, MD and Valerio M. Jasonni, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina Italy; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Modena, Modena, Italy.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Objective: Adiponectin is an exclusively adipose tissue–derived protein. Low plasma adiponectin levels have been found in hypertensive men. Our objective was to evaluate whether low first-trimester plasma adiponectin values were predictive of hypertensive disorders later in pregnancy.

Methods: A nested case-control study was carried out on a cohort of 1,842 pregnant women who participated in the first-trimester Down syndrome screening program; 34 developed preeclampsia and 48 gestational hypertension. A control group of 82 nonhypertensive uneventful pregnancies was selected. Plasma adiponectin was determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results: Adiponectin median concentrations in the group which subsequently became hypertensive were significantly lower than those in the control group (7.6 versus 13.0 µg/mL) (P < .001). When the 2 hypertensive subgroups were considered, the plasma adiponectin median value in the preeclampsia group was significantly lower than that in the gestational hypertension group (6.6 versus 9.3 µg/mL) (P = .01). Regression analysis showed an inverse correlation between plasma adiponectin concentrations and maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and proteinuria. Approximately 34% of hypertensive pregnancies, compared with 7% of controls (P < .001), had plasma adiponectin concentrations less than 6.4 µg/mL (mean value of lower quartile of distribution among control patients). After adjusting for maternal age, all these women experienced a 6.6-fold (95% confidence interval 2.5–17.8) increased risk of pregnancy hypertension, compared with those women who had higher concentrations

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a strong association between hypoadiponectinemia and the risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, especially with preeclampsia.

Level of Evidence: II-2


Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are characterized by several complications, such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), fetal distress, and renal and liver damage. Endothelial dysfunction seems to be the common pathway that leads to these clinical manifestations.1

Adiponectin is an exclusively adipose tissue–derived protein with important metabolic effects. In particular, adiponectin has been found to be reduced in patients with obesity2 and type 2 diabetes,3 whereas it is inversely correlated with insulin resistance,4 and it is well known that insulin resistance is highly correlated with hypertension.5 In a recent review, several mechanisms through which insulin resistance could increase blood pressure in pregnancy have been summarized. They included sympathetic nervous system activation, renal sodium retention, and endothelial dysfunction.6

Experimental data has demonstrated that adiponectin acts as an endogenous modulator, attenuating the excessive inflammatory response in the vascular wall.7 Therefore, plasma adiponectin may be considered a useful marker of endothelial function, particularly in hypertensive patients. In fact, the adiponectin concentration was significantly lower in hypertensive than in normotensive men regardless of insulin resistance.8

In the literature, there is only one study on adiponectin and hypertension in late pregnancy, which reports a paradoxical elevation of plasma adiponectin concentrations in women affected by preeclampsia when compared with control subjects.9 In our study we evaluated first-trimester plasma adiponectin levels in pregnant women who subsequently developed hypertensive disorders.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A nested case-control study was carried out on a cohort of 1,842 pregnant outpatients who participated in a 2-year study (2002–2003) in the first-trimester Down syndrome hospital-based screening program (9th to 13th weeks of gestation) and who later delivered in our hospital. Eighty-two patients developed hypertensive disorders: 34 preeclampsia and 48 gestational hypertension. Gestational hypertension was defined as diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater on at least 2 consecutive occasions after the 20th week of gestation in a previously normotensive woman. Preeclampsia was defined as gestational hypertension with significant proteinuria (> 300 mg/L in a 24-hour urinary collection). Blood pressure was measured with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. The complete disappearance of sound (Korotkoff phase V) was taken as diastolic blood pressure.

The control group of 82 nonhypertensive pregnant women who participated during the same period in the Down syndrome screening were selected among those who delivered an adequate gestational age fetus in our hospital after an uncomplicated pregnancy. The random assignment of the patients was done by utilizing as controls each first normotensive patient with an uneventful pregnancy, which was just after the hypertensive patient in the list of that day in which venous blood sampling of the Down syndrome screening was performed. So these patients were well-matched with the hypertensive groups for the length of storage of frozen samples, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), and BMI and gestational age at blood collection. All the patients were nonsmokers. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and all the patients gave their informed consent.

Samples were taken after an overnight fast. Time of sampling was standardized: 8–9 am. The samples were venous blood, and the anticoagulant used was tripotassium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (K3EDTA). The average time between the centrifugation and freezing of samples was approximately 5 minutes, after which samples were stored at –80°C. Plasma adiponectin was evaluated in the blood samples of the hypertensive and the control groups after the Down syndrome screening (9th to 13th weeks of gestation) and was measured by Sandwich ELISA with a commercially available adiponectin ELISA kit (Linco Research Inc, St. Charles, MO).

Determinations were performed only in one batch. The lower limit of the sensitivity of the assay was 0.8 ng/mL. In our laboratory, at a 30 ng/mL level, the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 1.9% and 7.5%, respectively.

The Mann-Whitney U test or t test was used to compare continuous variables between the 2 groups, whereas for noncontinuous variables, {chi}2 test was used. Furthermore, when more than 2 groups were considered, comparison across the groups was performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to adjust for differences in adiponectin concentrations for covariates, such as maternal age and gestational age at blood collection.

Associations of maternal adiponectin concentrations with covariates were estimated with Spearman correlation coefficients. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine which factors were significantly and independently correlated with plasma adiponectin variations, in a model consisting of maternal age, parity, prepregnancy BMI, BMI and gestational age at blood collection, birth weight, proteinuria, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures.

We considered each subject according to the quartiles determined by the distribution of adiponectin among the control patients. We used a multiple logistic regression to derive relative risk estimates: odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and as median and interquartile range. All reported CI values were calculated at the 95% level. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are reported in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences between the hypertensive patients and the control group patients in parity, prepregnancy BMI, and BMI and gestational age at blood collection. Instead, there were significant differences in maternal age (P = .009), gestational age at delivery (P < .001), and birth weight (P < .001). Plasma adiponectin median levels in the hypertensive group were significantly lower than in the control group (7.6 versus 13.0 µg/mL) (P < .001), even after adjusting for maternal age. Then, we considered the 2 hypertensive subgroups: preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. They differed significantly in birth weight (P = .001), gestational age at delivery (P < .001), and gestational age at blood collection (P = .01). Plasma adiponectin median concentrations in the preeclampsia group were significantly lower than in the gestational hypertension group (6.6 versus 9.3 µg/mL) (P = .001), even after adjusting for gestational age at blood collection. The difference in adiponectin plasma levels between the gestational hypertension group and the control group was also statistically significant (P = .006). When we considered the 3 groups together, ie, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and control group, we again found a difference that was highly statistically significant (P < .001) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Hypertensive Group and the Control Group

 

With univariate correlation analysis, plasma adiponectin concentrations in the preeclampsia group inversely correlated with prepregnancy BMI (r = –0.45, P = .008), BMI at the blood collection (r = –0.42, P = .01), fetal birth weight (r = –0.36, P = .03), proteinuria (r = –0.44, P = .01), and systolic blood pressure (r = –0.42, P = .01); there was no correlation with diastolic blood pressure (r = –0.14, P = .40) or maternal age (r = –0.08, P = .63). In the gestational hypertension group, adiponectin values directly correlated with maternal age (r = 0.89, P < .001) and inversely correlated with fetal birth weight (r = –0.40, P = .004), prepregnancy BMI (r = –0.34, P = .02), and systolic blood pressure (r = –0.71, P < .001); there was no correlation with BMI at blood collection (r = –0.19, P = .19) or diastolic blood pressure (r = –0.06, P = .67).

When all of those in the hypertensive group were considered, adiponectin concentration was inversely associated with maternal age (r = –0.47, P < .001), gestational age (r = –0.43, P = .001) and BMI at blood collection (r = –0.27, P = .001), prepregnancy BMI (r = –0.35, P = .001), systolic blood pressure (r = –0.6, P < .001), and proteinuria (r = 0.46, P < .001). There was no correlation with fetal birth weight (r = –0.13, P = .2) or diastolic blood pressure (r = –0.18, P = .9).

When multiple linear regression analysis was performed in the hypertensive group, again maternal age (ß = 0.49; 0.45 to 0.79), parity (ß = –0.25; –2.5 to –0.89), BMI at blood collection (ß = 4.4; 2.0 to 5.5), prepregnancy BMI (ß = –4.6; –5.8 to –2.2), systolic blood pressure (ß = –0.19; –0.09 to –0.02), and proteinuria (ß = –0.31; –0.02 to –0.009) were independently related to adiponectin plasma levels.

Approximately 34% of hypertensive pregnancies, compared with 7% of controls (P < .001), had plasma adiponectin concentrations less than 6.4 µg/mL, which was the mean value in the lower quartile of distribution among the control patients. All these women experienced a 6.5-fold increased risk of pregnancy hypertension, compared with those women who had higher concentrations (unadjusted OR 6.5; 95% CI 2.5–16.9). This association also did not change after adjustment for maternal age (OR 6.6; 95% CI 2.5–17.8) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Odds Ratios for the Association of the Lowest Quartile of Adiponectin Level With Preeclampsia, Gestational Hypertension, and All Hypertensive Pregnancies Versus the Control Group

 

When we considered the plasma adiponectin values distribution of the 2 hypertensive subgroups in the lowest quartile, we found that 25% of gestational hypertension patients and 47% of patients with preeclampsia had plasma adiponectin concentration less than 6.4 µg/mL (P < .01). This means that the OR was increased in the preeclampsia group (11.2, 95% CI 3.8–32.8) and in the gestational hypertension group (4.2, 95% CI 1.4–12.1). After adjustment for maternal age, the OR was 9.4 (95% CI 3.2–27.9) and 4.6 (95% CI 1.5–14.1) in the preeclampsia group and gestational hypertension group, respectively (Table 2).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study is the first that examines the relationship between plasma adiponectin and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy before the clinical manifestations of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia occur. A MEDLINE search of the period 1999–2004 was performed with the key words "adiponectin," "first trimester human pregnancy," "hypertension in pregnancy," and "preeclampsia." We have shown an inverse correlation between adiponectin and systolic blood pressure in pregnant hypertensive patients; the same result had been obtained in nonpregnant subjects.8,10 Like Iwashima et al,8 who stated that hypoadiponectinemia is a marker for a predisposition to hypertension, we suggest that adiponectin could be predictive of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. It seems that hypoadiponectinemia may select, from the first trimester, a high-risk population for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Assuming a cutoff of 6.4 µg/mL, which was the mean value in the lowest quartile of the control group, the relative risk of developing hypertension below this level was 6.6-fold greater than for those who had higher plasma adiponectin concentrations. In the lowest quartile, we found about one third of hypertensive cases (34%) and only 7% of controls; the difference was statistically significant and it means that there is a clear association between low adiponectin plasma values in the first trimester and the risk of hypertensive disorders later in pregnancy.

It is not known what the relationship between adiponectin and blood pressure is, but adiponectin's effects on the endothelium probably play an important role. Experimental data has demonstrated that adiponectin is a strong anti-inflammatory agent that acts through the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-{kappa}B) pathway,11 and furthermore, it may inhibit the production of C-reactive protein,12 a marker of inflammation.

On the other hand, adiponectin has been shown to increase nitric oxide production, activating the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) enzyme and increasing its expression.13 Moreover, it directly correlates with vasodilator response to reactive hyperemia.14 Then, it seems that adiponectin may protect the endothelium, attenuating the excessive inflammatory response in the vascular wall and increasing the vasodilatory condition. All these effects might positively influence the preservation of a normal blood pressure.

We have also studied plasma adiponectin concentrations in the 2 subgroups of hypertensive patients, and the relative risk is somewhat increased in the preeclampsia subgroup, where almost 50% of the patients had adiponectin plasma levels below the lowest quartile mean value, compared with only one fourth of the gestational hypertension subgroup. This strong association between hypoadiponectinemia and preeclampsia (in which subgroup, the adjusted OR in the lower quartile reached a 9.4-fold increased risk of hypertensive disease compared with those patients with higher adiponectin concentrations) could not be influenced only by insulin resistance, because the first trimester of pregnancy is characterized by a modest increase in insulin resistance.15 In this way, our results might be considered contradictory: low adiponectin levels in a period of not particularly high insulin resistance. Also in Ramsay et al's experience,9 and very recently in the Naruse et al study,16 there were contradictory results that the authors considered paradoxical: high adiponectin levels when insulin resistance is highest. In pregnant women who suffer preeclampsia, it seems that adiponectin plasma level behavior is completely different from that in normal pregnancies and might probably explain conflicting results about insulin resistance and preeclampsia, the relationship of which is far from being elucidated.

In conclusion, this is the first study examining plasma adiponectin behavior before the clinical manifestations of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. We suggest that hypoadiponectinemia might be considered predictive of pregnancy-induced hypertension syndromes and that it might be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, especially preeclampsia.


    Footnotes
 
Corresponding author: Professor Rosario D'Anna, Via Setaioli 15, 98121 Messina, Italy; e-mail: rosariodanna{at}tin.it.

doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000168441.79050.03


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rodgers GM, Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1200–4.[Medline]

2. Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Takahashi M, Maeda K, Miyagawa J, et al. Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999;257:79–83.[Medline]

3. Hotta K, Funahashi T, Arita Y, Takahashi M, Matsuda M, Okamoto Y, et al. Plasma concentrations of a novel, adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in type 2 diabetic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1595–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Cnop M, Havel PJ, Utzschneider KM, Carr DB, Sinha MK, Boyko EJ, et al. Relationship of adiponectin to body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and plasma lipoproteins: evidence for independent roles of age and sex. Diabetologia 2003;46:459–69.[Medline]

5. Wolf M, Sandler L, Munoz K, Hsu K, Ecker JL, Thadhani R. First trimester insulin resistance and subsequent preeclampsia: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:1563–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Solomon CG, Seely EW. Hypertension in pregnancy: a manifestation of the insulin resistance syndrome? Hypertension 2001;37:232–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Arita Y, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, Okamoto Y, et al. Novel modulator for endothelial adhesion molecules: adipocyte-derived plasma protein adiponectin. Circulation 1999;100:2473–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Iwashima Y, Katsuya T, Ishikawa K, Ouchi N, Ohishi M, Sugimoto K, et al. Hypoadiponectinemia is an independent risk factor for hypertension. Hypertension 2004;43:1318–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Ramsay JE, Jamieson N, Greer IA, Sattar N. Paradoxical elevation in adiponectin concentrations in women with preeclampsia. Hypertension 2003;42:891–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Ryo M, Nakamura T, Kihara S, Kumada M, Shibazaki S, Takahashi M, et al. Adiponectin as a biomarker of the metabolic syndrome. Circ J 2004;68:975–81.[Medline]

11. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Arita Y, Okamoto Y, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, et al. Adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived plasma protein, inhibits endothelial NF-kappaB signaling through a cAMP-dependent pathway. Circulation 2000;102:1296–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Funahashi T, Nakamura T, Nishida M, Kumada M, et al. Reciprocal association of C-reactive protein with adiponectin in blood stream and adipose tissue. Circulation 2003;107:671–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Hattori Y, Suzuki M, Hattori S, Kasai K. Globular adiponectin upregulates nitric oxide production in vascular endothelial cells. Diabetologia 2003;46:1543–9.[Medline]

14. Ouchi N, Ohishi M, Kihara S, Funahashi T, Nakamura T, Nagaretani H, et al. Association of hypoadiponectinemia with impaired vasoreactivity. Hypertension. 2003;42:231–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Wolfe RR, Calles J, Roman NM, Amini SB, et al. Carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy in control subjects and in women with gestational diabetes. Am J Physiol 1993;264:E60–7.

16. Naruse K, Yamasaki M, Umekage H, Sado T, Sakamoto Y, Morikawa H. Peripheral blood concentrations of adiponectin, an adipocyte-specific plasma protein, in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 2005;65:65–75.[Medline]

17. Kaaja R, Laivuori H, Laasko M, Tikkanen MJ, Ylikorkala O. Evidence of a state of increased insulin resistance in preeclampsia. Metabolism 1999;48:892–6.[Medline]

18. Caruso A, Ferrazzani S, De Carolis S, Lucchese A, Lanzone A, De Santis L, et al. Gestational hypertension but not pre-eclampsia is associated with insulin resistance syndrome characteristics. Hum Reprod 1999;14:219–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. Fasshauer, T. Waldeyer, J. Seeger, S. Schrey, T. Ebert, J. Kratzsch, U. Lossner, M. Bluher, M. Stumvoll, R. Faber, et al.
Circulating high-molecular-weight adiponectin is upregulated in preeclampsia and is related to insulin sensitivity and renal function
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 158(2): 197 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. Troisi, N. Potischman, and R. N. Hoover
Exploring the Underlying Hormonal Mechanisms of Prenatal Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: A Review and Commentary
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1700 - 1712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Sir-Petermann, B. Echiburu, M M. Maliqueo, N. Crisosto, F. Sanchez, C. Hitschfeld, M. Carcamo, P. Amigo, and F. Perez-Bravo
Serum adiponectin and lipid concentrations in pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1830 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. Lin, F. B. Hu, and G. Curhan
Serum Adiponectin and Renal Dysfunction in Men With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2007; 30(2): 239 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Anna, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jasonni, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by D'Anna, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jasonni, V. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Basic Science
Right arrow Hypertension and PIH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS