|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and 2Section of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Address reprint requests to: Lara A. Burrows, MD, Magee-Women's Hospital, 300 Halket Street, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; e-mail: burrowslj{at}yahoo.com.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: This retrospective study used data from 352 women with prolapse or urinary incontinence. The pelvic organ prolapse quantification measurements, as well as responses to 3 self-administered questionnaires assessing urinary, bowel, and sexual function were used. For each individual, pelvic organ prolapse quantification measures of prolapse were obtained in centimeters in relation to the hymen for 3 compartments: anterior vagina, vaginal apex or cervix, and posterior vagina. Data were analyzed by comparing the frequency of symptoms to centimeter measures of the most advanced prolapse (regardless of site) and the other compartments of prolapse.
RESULTS: Of the 330 patients available for analysis, 2.4% had stage I, 46.1% had stage II, 48.2% had stage III, and 3.3% had stage IV prolapse. The average age was 58.8 years (± 12.1), with a median parity of 3. Forty-eight percent were postmenopausal and taking estrogen, 27% were postmenopausal and not taking estrogen, and 25% were premenopausal. Patients who had stress incontinence symptoms had less advanced prolapse (median 5 cm less prolapse in the apical compartment) than patients without stress incontinence. Women who required manual assistance to urinate had more advanced prolapse (median 3.5 cm more prolapse in the most advanced compartment) than those who did not. Patients with urinary urgency and urge incontinence also had less advanced prolapse, although the differences were smaller than for stress incontinence (median 3 cm difference or less). There were no clinically significant differences in any compartment for symptoms related to sexual or bowel function.
CONCLUSION: Women with more advanced prolapse were less likely to have stress incontinence and more likely to manually reduce prolapse to void; however, prolapse severity was not associated with sexual or bowel symptoms.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
Many women with prolapse have lower urinary tract symptoms such as urgency, frequency, urinary incontinence, and difficulty voiding. To date, few studies have evaluated the relationship between prolapse and a patient's reported symptoms; some studies have focused on urodynamic findings.4,5 Romanzi et al6 found that lower urinary tract symptoms such as urgency, frequency, urge incontinence, and difficulty voiding were more common in women with more advanced prolapse.
The relationship between prolapse and female sexuality is not well understood. Women with prolapse may suffer from dyspareunia, decreased orgasmic capacity, decreased libido and embarrassment or fear of their altered anatomy. Some studies have found that prolapse negatively affected sexual functioning.7,8 Other reports found an improvement after surgical repair of the prolapse.9
Anorectal dysfunction is probably the least well-studied pelvic symptom in women with prolapse. These patients may experience pain with defecation, the need to splint or strain to have a bowel movement, or anal incontinence. In a study on bowel symptoms in women with prolapse, Weber et al10 found a weak association (r = 0.23) between symptoms and the extent of posterior vaginal prolapse. Meschia et al11 found a 2-fold increased risk of anal incontinence in patients with a rectocele greater than grade 2.
In June 2001, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) outlined topics of priority for research on female pelvic floor disorders, including studies on the "type and frequency of symptoms in women with symptomatic prolapse."12 The aim of our study was to describe bladder and bowel symptoms as well as sexual functioning in women with pelvic organ prolapse and to compare the frequency of specific pelvic symptoms by the severity of prolapse.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The database contained the patient's pelvic organ prolapse quantification measurements13 as well as responses to 3 nonvalidated, self-administered questionnaires assessing urinary, bowel, and sexual function (see Appendix). Given the number of subjects available in the database, we expected to be able to estimate the frequency of a given symptom within a confidence interval (CI) of 10%. For example, in this database, the symptom of stress urinary incontinence occurred in 59% of subjects, with a 95% CI of 5464%. This study received approval from the Cleveland Clinic and Magee-Women's Hospital Institutional Review Boards.
The questionnaires assessed symptom occurrence with 4 possible responses: never or rarely, less than once a week, more than once a week but less than once a day, and once a day or more. Each symptom was analyzed individually as an ordinal variable. Symptoms were also analyzed in a dichotomous fashion. In those who answered "never or rarely" to a given symptom, the symptom was considered absent; for any other response, the symptom was considered present.
For each individual, pelvic organ prolapse quantification measures of prolapse were obtained in centimeters (to the nearest half centimeter) in relation to the hymen for 3 compartments: the anterior vagina, the vaginal apex or cervix, and the posterior vagina. We compared centimeter measures of the most advanced prolapse (regardless of site) and the other compartments of prolapse with symptoms (present or absent) and with the frequency of symptoms (ordinal responses on the questionnaires). Because of the variability inherent in pelvic organ prolapse quantification measurements, differences in prolapse of 1 cm or less were judged not likely to be of clinical significance although, in some cases, differences of this magnitude achieved statistical significance.
All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 10.1.4 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The median centimeter measurements of prolapse (most advanced, anterior, apical, and posterior) did not appear to follow a normal distribution when graphically displayed. In addition, the values of the skewness, kurtosis, and Shapiro-Wilk test statistics indicated a significant departure from normality. Therefore, nonparametric methods were used to evaluate these data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate differences in the median centimeter measurements of prolapse (most advanced, anterior, apical, and posterior) between women with and those without each symptom. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate the differences between the median centimeter measurements of prolapse and the severity of symptoms (ordinal responses on the questionnaires). Records with missing data for the symptom in question were excluded from analysis. All statistical tests were evaluated at the 0.05 level of significance.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Table 2 provides centimeter measures of prolapse at maximum and in individual compartments for each urinary symptom. Consistent with clinical experience, the most prolapsed compartment was progressively more advanced as the severity of symptoms worsened in patients who required manual assistance to urinate (Table 3). Conversely, women with symptoms of stress incontinence had less advanced prolapse anteriorly and at the vaginal apex. As with stress incontinence, urgency and urge incontinence occurred more often in women with less advanced prolapse, although the magnitude of the differences was lower than for stress incontinence. One hundred and sixty-eight women (51%) used pads for urinary incontinence and had 3 cm less prolapse in the most advanced compartment than those who did not use pads (P = .001). Among those who used pads, there was no relationship between the number of pads used per day and the amount of prolapse.
|
|
The association between prolapse and specific sexual symptoms is shown in Table 4. Of the 330 patients with prolapse, 169 (52%) were sexually active and responded to these questions. Among those who were sexually active, 47 (20%) reported urinary incontinence with intercourse. These 47 women had a median 2 cm less prolapse in both the maximum and apical compartments compared with women who were not incontinent with intercourse (P < .001). Among those who felt their vagina was too long, their median total vaginal length was 11.0 cm, whereas patients who felt their vaginal length was not a problem or who felt it was too short had a median measurement of 10.0 cm (P = .2). Patients who either felt that their vagina was too loose (n = 61) or that the size was not a problem (n = 102) had a median genital hiatus measurement of 3.0 cm, whereas the 8 patients who felt their vagina was too tight had a median measurement of 2.5 cm (P = .03). The association between bowel functioning and individual prolapsed compartments is shown in Table 5.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prior literature indicates that many women with mild prolapse have stress urinary incontinence.6 Alternatively, patients with advanced prolapse commonly do not have stress urinary incontinence but are more likely to have difficulty voiding.14 Our findings also suggest that patients with advanced prolapse are less likely to have stress urinary incontinence than those who did not have this symptom. Additionally, those who required manual assistance to urinate had significantly more prolapse than patients who did not have this symptom. This supports the theory that advanced prolapse obstructs voiding and the manifestation of stress incontinence in some women. It might be expected that women with advanced prolapse and possible obstructed voiding would have more irritative symptoms, such as urgency; however, we found that patients with urgency and urge incontinence had less advanced prolapse than patients without these symptoms.
Our data show that prolapse had little correlation with sexual activity. In spite of having prolapse, half the women in this study were sexually active. Some authors have found that prolapse has a negative impact on sexual function.7 However, our findings are consistent with those of Weber et al15 who found that measures of sexual function were similar in women with and without prolapse. Assessing sexual activity in this population can be challenging because there may be circumstances other than prolapse precluding sexual activity, such as functional impairments and spousal limitations.
The extent of prolapse was not predictive of bowel symptoms except for the need for manual assistance during defecation. Although this finding achieved statistical significance, it is not likely to represent a clinically significant difference. We expected that patients with more advanced posterior compartment prolapse would have this symptom. Interestingly, the difference between those who did and those who did not have this symptom was only 0.5 centimeters.
This study has many of the limitations inherent in a retrospective study. The subjects were women who sought treatment for their prolapse and/or urinary incontinence. Thus, our results are affected to some degree by selection bias. Women with less advanced prolapse were more likely to present with urinary symptoms as their primary complaint. However, because urinary symptoms and prolapse coexist in so many women, it would be difficult to find a clinical population of women who had only prolapse. Additionally, objective measures such as office bladder testing to correlate with subjective findings were not available, and validated questionnaires were not used.
In conclusion, our findings are similar to what other authors have found: pelvic organ prolapse measurements do not correlate strongly with many pelvic symptoms. We found the greatest difference in prolapse status for women with stress incontinence symptoms (less advanced prolapse) and the need to manually assist urination (more advanced prolapse). Defining pelvic symptoms in women with prolapse is essential for evaluating procedures for treating this condition. Although objective postsurgical evaluations of pelvic support are important, the patient's subjective reports are as important and require baseline data for comparison. Prospective studies using validated instruments as well as objective assessments are needed to fully characterize symptoms in women with prolapse.
APPENDIX A: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR URINARY FUNCTION
APPENDIX B: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SEXUAL FUNCTION
IF YOU ARE NOT CURRENTLY SEXUALLY ACTIVE, PLEASE GO ON TO THE NEXT QUESTIONNAIRE.
APPENDIX C: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR BOWEL FUNCTION
| Footnotes |
|---|
doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000142708.61298.be
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:13328.[Medline]
3. Mouritsen L, Larsen JP. Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003;14:1227.[Medline]
4. Coates KW, Harris RL, Cundiff GW, Bump RC. Uroflow in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Urol 1997;80:21721.[Medline]
5. Versi E, Lyell DJ, Griffiths DJ. Videourodynamic diagnosis of occult genuine stress incontinence in patients with anterior vaginal wall relaxation. J Soc Gynecol Investig 1998;5:32730.[Medline]
6. Romanzi LJ, Chaiken DC, Blaivis JG. The effect of genital prolapse on voiding. J Urol 1999;161:5816.[Medline]
7. Barber MD, Visco AG, Wyman JF, Fantl JA, Bump RC. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:2819.
8. Rogers RG, Villarreal A, Kammerer-Doak D, Qualls C. Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:3615.[Medline]
9. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:16105.[Medline]
10. Weber AM, Walters MD, Ballard LA, Booher DL, Piedmonte MR. Posterior vaginal prolapse and bowel function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:144650.[Medline]
11. Meschia M, Buonaguidi A, Pifarotti P, Somigliana E, Spennacchop M, Amicarelli F. Prevalence of anal incontinence in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:71923.
12. Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Davis G, Dmochowski RR, et al. The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogyn J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:17886.
13. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:107.[Medline]
14. Yalcin OT, Yildirim A, Hassa H. The effects of severe cystocele on urogynecologic symptoms and findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:4237.[Medline]
15. Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR, Mitchinson A. Sexual function in women with uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:4837.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Bradley, M. B. Zimmerman, Q. Wang, I. E. Nygaard, and for the Women's Health Initiative Vaginal Descent and Pelvic Floor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women: A Longitudinal Study Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2008; 111(5): 1148 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Bradley, I. E. Nygaard, and for the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Vaginal Wall Descensus and Pelvic Floor Symptoms in Older Women Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2005; 106(4): 759 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Weber and H. E. Richter Pelvic Organ Prolapse Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2005; 106(3): 615 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |