|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Address reprint requests to: John E. Anderson, PhD, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC/MS E-46, Atlanta GA 30333; e-mail: jea1{at}cdc.gov.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: We used data from 55,712 women aged 18 to 44 years who responded to questions on antiretroviral treatment in the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We obtained the percentage of women who correctly answered a question on treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV and determined factors independently associated with such knowledge using a multiple logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Overall, the percentage of women who correctly stated that treatment existed to help prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV was 58.6% (95% confidence interval 57.9, 59.3). In the multiple logistic regression model that controlled for sociodemographics, having correct knowledge about treatment to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission was independently associated with being black, younger age (1834 years), college level education, and having been tested for HIV. Current pregnancy was not an independent predictor of having knowledge about the availability of treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission.
CONCLUSION: Among US women of childbearing age, just over one half had correct knowledge of effective perinatal HIV prevention strategies. Increasing the awareness of these treatments may lead to greater uptake of HIV testing among pregnant women.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We analyzed the responses of women aged 18 to 44 years for two separate "true/false" questions about the availability of treatment for HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) which were read to the respondents. First, "A pregnant woman with HIV can get treatment to help reduce the chances that she will pass the virus to her baby," and second, for comparison, a more general question on HIV treatment, "There are medical treatments available that are intended to help a person who is infected with HIV to live longer." We computed the percentage of women aged 18 to 44 years who answered correctly for population subgroups (sociodemographic categories, self-reported pregnancy status, and self-reported HIV testing status). We also developed a multiple logistic regression model to determine which factors were independently associated with knowledge about treatments to prevent of perinatal HIV transmission. We used SUDAAN software to adjust estimates and statistical tests for the complex sample design (SUDAAN 7; Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC; 1996).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Although knowledge rate among pregnant women was higher than average (64.7%), pregnancy at the time of interview was not an independent predictor of having knowledge about treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission. Although this survey collects information on history of HIV testing, such questions are not specific to pregnancy-related HIV testing. State-specific estimates indicate that there was considerable variation in knowledge among states (Figure 1
).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among women surveyed who reported themselves pregnant, no data were collected on whether the woman was receiving prenatal care. The proportion of pregnant women in our analysis who knew about preventive treatment was within the 5166% range reported by studies conducted in a few states.8,9
Our analysis indicates a positive and statistically significant association among childbearing-aged women between knowledge of treatment to prevent perinatal HIV transmission and ever having been tested for HIV. Other studies have suggested that knowledge of the benefits of testing influence women to obtain a prenatal HIV test.6,9,10 The Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System data are subject to coverage and reporting errors that affect survey data. Persons who are institutionalized or who lack home telephones are excluded from the survey, for example. Despite its limitations, these data shed light on one of the important factors associated with accessing and utilizing HIV prevention services.
Despite recommendations that all pregnant women be tested for HIV, studies have suggested that testing is not universal. For example, data from representative samples of the medical charts of pregnant women in 8 states indicated that the percentage tested in 1998 and 1999 ranged from 25% in Oregon to 85% in Tennessee.2 Reasons for low percentages tested include barriers to the offer of testing by prenatal care providers, poor documentation of testing in the medical record, and refusal of testing by pregnant women.35
Increased awareness of the very low transmission rates achievable with appropriate interventions may lead more pregnant women to accept HIV testing. Clinicians who provide care to pregnant women can play an important role in improving awareness about treatment to reduce mother-to-child HIV transmission. Public health efforts to increase acceptance with HIV testing among pregnant women should focus also on increasing awareness among women of childbearing years that highly effective interventions exist to prevent the transmission of HIV from mother to infant. Social marketing efforts by publicly and privately funded HIV prevention programs to increase womens knowledge of the benefits of prenatal HIV testing and availability of treatments could increase HIV test acceptance. Systematic reviews of maternal medical charts, with regular feedback to delivery hospitals, could lead to improved documentation of prenatal HIV testing. Our data suggest that women of child bearing age in all states, particularly those of lower education and socioeconomic status, could benefit from more education about the effectiveness of perinatal HIV transmission interventions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 19, 2003. Received in revised form September 12, 2003. Accepted October 1, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV testing among pregnant women: United States and Canada, 19982001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51: 10136.[Medline]
3. Institute of Medicine. Reducing the odds: preventing perinatal transmission of HIV in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
4. Royce RA, Walter EB, Fernandez MI, Wilson TE, Ickovics JR, Simonds RJ. Barriers to universal prenatal HIV testing in 4 US locations in 1997. Am J Public Health 2001;91:72733.[Abstract]
5. Ruiz JD, Molitor F, Prussing E, Peck L, Grasso P. Prenatal HIV counseling and testing in California: womens experiences and providers practices. AIDS Educ Prev 2002;14:1905.[Medline]
6. Fernandez MI, Wilson TE, Ethier KA, Walter EB, Gay CL, Moore J. Acceptance of HIV testing during prenatal care. Public Health Rep 2000;115:4608.[Medline]
7. Aluwalia IB, Mack KA, Murphy W, Mokdad AH, Bales VS. State-specific prevalence of selected chronic disease-related characteristics: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001. MMWR Surveill Summ 2003;52(8):180.[Medline]
8. Walter EB, Royce RA, Fernandez MI, DeHovitz J, Ickovics JR, Lampe MA. New mothers knowledge and attitudes about perinatal human immunodeficiency virus infection. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(1):706.
9. Ruiz JD, Molitor F. Knowledge of treatment to reduce perinatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission and likelihood of testing for HIV: results from two surveys of women of childbearing age. Matern Child Health J 1998;2:11722.[Medline]
10. McKinney MM, McSpirit S, Pomeroy C. Prenatal HIV prevention practices in a low seroprevalence state. AIDS Educ Prev 2000;12:25262.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |