|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Departments of Radiology and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba City, Japan.
Address reprint requests to: Kiyoshi Ohara, MD, University of Tsukuba, Institute of Clinical Medicine, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba City 305-8575, Japan; E-mail: ki-ohara{at}md.tsukuba.ac.jp.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: The cases of 60 patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy for cervical squamous cell carcinoma (stage III: n = 20; stage IIIIV: n = 40) were reviewed. Measurements of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels (n = 60), estimated tumor volume on preradiotherapy MRIs (n = 60), and evaluated tumor shrinkage on postradiotherapy MRIs available (n = 30) were taken. The relation between postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen level 2 months after the start of radiotherapy and disease recurrence was investigated. Regression analysis of tumor volume measured on MRIs was used to estimate the extent of tumor shrinkage 2 months after the start of radiotherapy.
RESULTS: Preradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels correlated significantly with preradiotherapy tumor volumes. Recurrence was identified in 27 patients as distant (n = 19), distant and local (n = 1), local (n = 5), or regional (n = 2). Of 51 patients with elevated preradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels, 33 achieved normalized levels after radiotherapy. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen normalization was associated with a higher recurrence-free survival rate at 2 years (74.3%) than that associated with nonnormalization of squamous cell carcinoma antigen (5.6%, P < .001). The extent of shrinkage ranged from 61% to 100%, and there was no local recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen status is a useful indicator of clinical outcome, particularly about tumor recurrence. It is not, however, useful for assessing response to radiotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for obtaining an objective assessment of radioresponse.
The response of tumors to radiotherapy or chemotherapy is one of the most significant clinical predictors of cancer control. Tumor response is usually assessed morphologically by the extent of tumor shrinkage after treatment.1,2 The extent of shrinkage can be determined objectively by measuring tumors either directly or indirectly via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging techniques. For difficult-to-measure tumors, serum tumor-associated antigens can be used as biochemical measures of response to treatment. Serum prostate-specific antigen, for example, is a powerful indicator of the radioresponse of localized prostate cancer.3 In radiotherapy of cervical cancer, however, tumor response has been assessed only subjectively by pelvic examination. This is because physical examination is convenient for estimating the size, color, consistency, and extent of pericervical tumor infiltration, this form of response assessment by experts is considered a good predictor of the likelihood of local disease control, and CT scanning fails to differentiate the tumor mass from normal cervical tissue. Objective measures are needed, however, particularly at the time radiotherapy ceases, when the necessity for adjunctive treatment must be determined. Determination of serum levels of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, a tumor-associated antigen, has been used recently to monitor patients with cervical cancer.4 Squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels are useful clinical measures of estimating tumor burden before and after treatment.5 Magnetic resonance imaging is used in pretreatment staging because it clearly delineates the cervical tumor mass.6 Thus, we performed a retrospective analysis of squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels and MRI-based estimates of tumor shrinkage to determine whether these measures can be used at the time of cessation of radiotherapy as objective indicators of the radioresponse of cervical cancer.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
External radiotherapy was performed with 10 MV x-rays through anteroposteriorly opposed, whole pelvic portals with a fraction size of 2.0 or 1.8 Gy at five fractions per week to a total dose of 50.0 or 50.4 Gy. Five elderly patients with stage IB or IIB disease were treated through small pelvic portals instead of whole pelvic portals. A midline shielding was placed when intracavitary radiotherapy was started. For patients with persistent parametrial induration or pelvic lymphadenopathy detected by pretreatment CT scanning, boost irradiation was given at doses up to 64.0 Gy in total (n = 22). For patients with paraaortic lymphadenopathy detected by CT scanning, paraaortic radiotherapy was given at total doses ranging from 40.0 to 50.4 Gy concurrent with (n = 1) or after (n = 5) pelvic radiotherapy. Intracavitary radiotherapy was performed with a high doserate remote afterloading system with cobalt-60 sources before September 1993 and with an iridium-192 source thereafter. A set of intrauterine tandem and vaginal ovoid applicators was usually used. The prescribed dose to reference point A was 6.0 Gy per insertion, and 36 weekly insertions were performed according to the tumor size. Typically, stage IIIB patients with medium-sized tumors were treated with 30 Gy of whole pelvic irradiation followed by four insertions of intracavitary radiotherapy concurrent with centrally shielded pelvic irradiation of 2030 Gy, with the overall treatment time of 7 weeks. The overall pelvic radiotherapy treatment time ranged from 29 to 66 days (median 49 days), and for 48 (80%) of the patients it ranged from 40 to 60 days.
Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels (normal
1.5 ng/mL) were determined serially: prior to radiotherapy, once or twice per month during radiotherapy, and once per month after radiotherapy. Changes in serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels were analyzed in each patient over 3 months after the radiotherapy by plotting squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels on a semilogarithmic scale nomogram. The day that preradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen level was determined was considered day 0. We used a semi-logarithmic scale because radiation-induced cell death is exponential. Postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen status was determined 2 months after the start of radiotherapy, typically near the time of cessation of radiotherapy.
A tumor was identified as a hyperintense lesion on T2-weighted MRIs. Tumor volume was estimated according to the following equation on the assumption that the tumor mass was ellipsoid in shape:
![]() | (1) |
where V is the tumor volume, L is the maximum craniocaudal length, T is the maximum dorsoventral thickness, and W is the maximum lateral width. Preradiotherapy MRIs were obtained within 2 weeks before radiotherapy was begun. Postradiotherapy MRIs were obtained immediately before or immediately after the cessation of radiotherapy, which was between 24 and 65 days (median 42 days) after the start of radiotherapy. Because the postradiotherapy MRIs were not obtained at the same time in all cases, regression analysis was used to estimate the extent of shrinkage at 2 months after the start of radiotherapy. The resulting data were compared with the squamous cell carcinoma antigen response data obtained 2 months after the start of radiotherapy. Preradiotherapy and postradiotherapy tumor volumes for each patient (n = 30) were plotted on a semilogarithmic scale nomogram, with day 0 being the day that preradiotherapy tumor volume was determined. The semilogarithmic scale was used under the assumption that the tumors shrank exponentially over time (which was confirmed by our analysis of squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels). A tumor that showed shrinkage of 100% was regarded as 0.1 mm3 in volume for the purpose of exponential regression analysis. The rate of tumor shrinkage, defined as the slope of the tumor shrinkage curve, was determined by an exponential regression equation as follows:
![]() | (2) |
where VD is the expected postradiotherapy tumor volume D number of days after radiotherapy initiation, V0 is the preradiotherapy tumor volume, and B is the rate of tumor shrinkage (day-1). The extent of shrinkage was calculated by substituting 60 for D in Equation 2.
During the clinical follow-up examinations, when a patient showed a continued rise in serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels without evidence of local recurrence, possible sites of recurrence were checked systemically. The initial site of recurrence was categorized as local (including disease persistence), regional (pelvic lymph node), or distant (outside the treated area).
Recurrence-free survival time and survival time were calculated by the KaplanMeier method, beginning at the start of radiotherapy. StatView 4.5 (Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA) was used for all statistical analyses. The unpaired t test was used to analyze differences in preradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels and in preradiotherapy tumor volumes between patients grouped by clinical stage. The relation between preradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels and preradiotherapy tumor volumes was determined by regression analysis. Patterns of squamous cell carcinoma antigen level changes were determined. Postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen status, that is, normalized or not normalized, was investigated in relation to the recurrence-free survival rate. Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences in postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen status between patients grouped by clinical stage. The relation between the rate of tumor shrinkage and preradiotherapy tumor volume was determined by regression analysis. The extent of shrinkage was analyzed in relation to local disease control. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in recurrence-free survival rates between patients grouped according to postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen status. The MannWhitney U test was used for comparisons between unmatched pair groups. P values of less than .05 were considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Of 51 patients with elevated preradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels, 33 (64.7%) achieved a normal squamous cell carcinoma antigen status within 2 months of the start of radiotherapy (Table 1
). Of the remaining 18 patients who failed to achieve normal squamous cell carcinoma antigen status within the first 2 months, four did so within another month; and two of these four underwent sequential paraaortic lymphnode irradiation. Patients with early-stage disease achieved squamous cell carcinoma antigen normalization at a higher rate than did those with advanced-stage disease, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .099). The preradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels were significantly higher in the 18 patients in whom squamous cell carcinoma antigen was not normalized (range 2.7322.0 ng/mL, median 27.2 ng/ mL) than in the 33 patients in whom squamous cell carcinoma antigen was normalized (range 1.7176.0 ng/ mL, median 7.5 ng/mL; P = .003). Changes in squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels were biphasic, particularly in patients who achieved antigen normalization (Figure 2
). The initial increase or plateau in the squamous cell carcinoma antigen level was observed 23 weeks after the start of radiotherapy and was followed by an exponential decline in the squamous cell carcinoma antigen level. The initial phase was identified in 30 (73.2%) of 41 patients for whom squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels 23 weeks after the start of radiotherapy were available.
|
|
The extent of shrinkage 2 months after the start of radiotherapy ranged from 61.4% to 100% (median, 99.3%); 11 tumors (36.7%) disappeared completely, whereas six tumors showed 90% or less shrinkage (Figure 4
). Of the 30 patients noted above, 16 showed recurrence: distant (n = 12), local and distant (n = 1), local (n = 2), and regional (n = 1). Local disease control was achieved for 1 year or more in 25 patients (>2 years in 19 patients) and for less than 1 year in two patients. One patient who showed 94.7% tumor shrinkage but not normalization of squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels after radiotherapy suffered a local recurrence. Two other patients who had a local recurrence did achieve squamous cell carcinoma antigen normalization; one had 61.4% postradiotherapy shrinkage, and the other had 100% postradiotherapy shrinkage.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nonnormalization of the squamous cell carcinoma antigen level after radiotherapy was associated highly with recurrence, mainly with distant metastasis in patients with advanced stage III or stage IV disease. Hong et al9 also found that nonnormalization of the squamous cell carcinoma antigen level 3 months after the start of radiotherapy was a significant predictor of reduced survival time due to distant metastasis, even in patients with early stage I or II disease. Therefore, the tumors that will likely respond completely to radiotherapy without metastasizing are distinguishable by the postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen normalization, although a few false negatives may occur.11,12 Ngan et al12 reported that three of 56 patients (5.4%) in whom antigen was normalized had histologic residual disease confirmed by biopsy, whereas three of five patients (60%) in whom antigen was not normalized had histologic residual disease.
Biochemical response may predict local control earlier than morphologic response does. Hong et al9 observed that squamous cell carcinoma antigennormalized patients had a good prognosis regardless of palpable residual induration 23 months after radiotherapy. Among 214 antigen-normalized patients, those with residual induration and those without induration showed similar local recurrence rates: 13% (3/24) and 6% (11/190), respectively. This similarity implies that residual induration immediately after radiotherapy is not a strong predictor of local failure. This is supported by our MRI-based analysis of tumor shrinkage and by the findings of Flueckiger et al.13 Large tumors tend to shrink more slowly than small tumors, and therefore, large tumors take a relatively long time to disappear after sterilization. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to physical examination in the differential assessment of residual tumors and coexisting radiation fibrosis associated with palpable induration. Therefore, squamous cell carcinoma antigen status will be of use in predicting, at the time of radiotherapy cessation, whether the residual tumor will become sterile.
The relation between an MRI-identified residual tumor and the presence of residual cancer cells was studied by Hatano et al in biopsy specimens.14 They observed that 14 of 42 patients showed an MRI-identified residual tumor 1 month after the cessation of radiotherapy, and that six of these 14 tumors were histologically positive. Among the respective six patients, the presence of residual cancer was confirmed in salvage surgery specimens from three patients and by recurrence in two patients; residual cancer was unconfirmed for the remaining patient because of ongoing intracavitary radiotherapy. Thus, MRI-based examination for residual tumor immediately after the cessation of radiotherapy fails to accurately predict the presence of residual cancer cells. A study of the relation between the presence of residual cancer cells and postradiotherapy squamous cell carcinoma antigen status is needed.
In summary, in definitive radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma, determination of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen status is useful for predicting systemic disease recurrence associated with nonnormalization of squamous cell carcinoma antigen rather than for assessing radioresponse quantitatively. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for quantitative assessment of tumor shrinkage, and the majority of tumors eventually disappears or nearly disappears on MRIs obtained after radiotherapy. Because disease recurrence is associated even with tumors that disappear completely, however, methods that can precisely assess radioresponse, regardless of the tumor status on MRIs or whether a tumor persisting at the end of radiotherapy is later sterilized, are needed.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received September 13, 2001. Received in revised form January 15, 2002. Accepted February 14, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhouer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:20516.
3. Landmann C, Hunig R. Prostatic specific antigen as an indicator of response to radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:10736.[Medline]
4. Kato H, Torigoe T. Radioimmunoassay for tumor antigen of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 1977; 41:16218.
5. Bolli JAN, Doering DL, Bosscher JR, Day TG Jr, Rao CV, Owens K, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen: Clinical utility in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1994;55:16973.[Medline]
6. Togashi K, Morikawa K, Kataoka ML, Konishi J. Cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:3917.[Medline]
7. Avall-Lundqvist EH, Sjövall K, Nilsson BR, Enoroth PHE. Prognostic significance of pretreatment serum levels of squamous cell carcinoma antigen and CA 125 in cervical carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1992;28A:16951702.
8. Duk JM, Groenier KH, de Bruijin HWA, Hollema H, ten Hoor KA, van der Zee AGJ, et al. Pretreatment serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen: A newly identified prognostic factor in early-stage cervical carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1118.[Abstract]
9. Hong JH, Tsai CS, Chang JT, Wang CC, Lai CH, Lee SP, et al. The prognostic significance of pre- and posttreatment SCC levels in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated by radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41:82330.[Medline]
10. Maruo T, Shibata K, Kimura A, Hoshina M, Mochizuki M. Tumor-associated antigen, TA-4, in the monitoring of the effects of therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Serial determination and tissue localization. Cancer 1985;56:3028.[Medline]
11. Rose PG, Baker S, Founier L, Nelson BE, Hunter RE. Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in invasive cervical cancer: Prediction of response and recurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:9426.[Medline]
12. Ngan HYS, Chan SYW, Wong LC, Choy DTK, Ma HK. Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in the monitoring of radiotherapy treatment response in carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1990;37:2603.[Medline]
13. Flueckiger F, Ebner F, Poschauko H, Tamussino K, Einspieler R, Ranner G. Cervical cancer: Serial MR imaging before and after primary radiation: A 2-year follow-up study. Radiology 1992;184:8993.
14. Hatano K, Sekiya Y, Araki H, Sakai M, Togawa T, Narita Y, et al. Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy on cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;45:63944.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |