Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;100:59-64
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Buller, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Buller, R. E.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Preoperative CA 125 Levels: An Independent Prognostic Factor for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Brian C. Cooper, MD, Anil K. Sood, MD, Charles S. Davis, PhD, Justine M. Ritchie, PhD, Joel I. Sorosky, MD, Barrie Anderson, MD and Richard E. Buller, MD, PhD

From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Department of Biostatistics, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.

Address reprint requests to: Anil K. Sood, MD, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242; E-mail: anil-sood{at}uiowa.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association of preoperative CA 125 levels with outcome in primary ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS: One hundred forty-two patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, who had a serum CA 125 level drawn before surgery, were retrospectively evaluated. The relationship of preoperative CA 125 levels and various preoperative and postoperative variables was evaluated. CA 125 levels were determined using a solid-phase immunoassay.

RESULTS: The median CA 125 value for all patients was 582 U/mL (range 7–52,930 U/mL). Preoperative CA 125 values did not correlate with increasing age (P = .40), but were found to be significantly associated with serous histology compared with other histology (median CA 125 of 870 versus 334 U/mL, P = .02), high-stage (III/IV) compared with low-stage (median CA 125 of 893 versus 174 U/mL, P < .001), high tumor grade (3) compared with grade 1 or 2 (median CA 125 of 928 versus 323 U/mL, P < .001), and the presence of ascites compared with absence of ascites (median CA 125 of 893 versus 220 U/mL, P < .001). Suboptimal cytoreduction (more than 1 cm residual) was associated with significantly higher CA 125 levels (1067 U/mL) compared with individuals with optimal cytoreduction (399 U/mL, P < .001). Preoperative CA 125 values less than 500 U/mL had a positive predictive value for optimal cytoreduction of 82%, but a poor negative predictive value of 48%. After adjusting for covariates, there was a significant association between CA 125 levels and disease-specific survival. As preoperative CA 125 levels increased, the risk of death increased except at the highest values of CA 125.

CONCLUSION: Preoperative CA 125 is an independent risk factor for death due to disease in ovarian cancer, but not a reliable predictor of optimal cytoreduction.

Bast et al first described a radioimmunoassay that could detect CA 125 in the serum of ovarian cancer patients in 1983,1 but CA 125 is not useful as a screening test for ovarian cancer because up to 50% of patients with low-stage (I or II) cancer have normal levels.1–2 In addition, a variety of benign processes are associated with an elevated CA 125, especially in premenopausal women.1,3–9 The ability to monitor treatment and diagnose disease progression of ovarian cancer using CA 125 has been established,10 however, the clinical value of preoperative serum CA 125 levels in ovarian cancer remains to be defined. Several authors have studied preoperative CA 125 levels in evaluation of a pelvic mass.11–17 Preoperative CA 125 levels were helpful in diagnosing malignant masses in postmenopausal patients, but preoperative decisions regarding treatment could not be made on CA 125 levels alone because of the high false-positive rate of malignancy. There are limited data regarding the utility of CA 125 as a predictor of clinical or surgical outcome. Chi et al reported that in patients with a CA 125 level over 500 U/mL, only one in five could be optimally cytoreduced.18 However, this study was limited to stage III patients only. We undertook the present study to assess the usefulness of preoperative serum CA 125 levels in all patients with ovarian cancer with regard to prediction of clinical and surgical outcome.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The medical records of 142 patients treated at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics for ovarian cancer between 1990 and 1996 with preoperative serum CA 125 levels were reviewed. Approval for this study was obtained from the institutional review board of the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Serum CA 125 levels were determined using a commercially available assay through Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL) for all patients. Only patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were included in this study. There were a total of 151 patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer treated at the University of Iowa during this period.

Patients were evaluated for their preoperative CA 125 level, age, histology, grade, International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage, presence or absence of ascites, residual disease, operative findings, timing of recurrence, and demise. Patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years. All patients underwent surgical exploration and cytoreduction as the initial treatment, performed by a staff gynecologic oncologist and a fellow. Optimal cytoreduction was defined as less than 1 cm residual disease (distinct nodules) after cytoreductive surgery, in accordance with studies published by the Gynecologic Oncology Group.19 All patients were surgically staged according to the FIGO staging system. The pathology for all patients was reviewed by a gynecologic pathologist. After surgery, all patients were treated with platinum and paclitaxel for adjuvant chemotherapy. The status of each patient was recorded as alive without disease, alive with disease, dead of disease, or dead of other causes.

The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare the CA 125 distributions across subgroups of patients depending on age, histology, stage, grade, presence or absence of ascites, and cytoreduction. Survival analysis was based on death due to disease using the Cox proportional hazards regression model; P < .05 was considered significant. Patients who died of other causes or were alive at last follow-up were censored at the date of death or date of last follow-up.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The patient characteristics and associated preoperative CA 125 levels are listed in Table 1Go. The value of preoperative CA 125 ranged from 7 to 52,930 U/mL with a mean value of 2214 U/mL and a median of 582 U/mL. The mean value was greater than 75% of the observations. To evaluate the possible effect of age, patients were divided into four categories at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of distribution of age. There was no significant difference in preoperative CA 125 levels based on age (P = .40). This was also true when the patients were divided into two, three, and five equal-sized groups (P = .20, .74, and .85, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Preoperative CA 125 Levels
 
Ninety-five patients (67%) had serous histology. The median CA 125 level for patients with serous histology was 870 U/mL, which was significantly higher than those with other histologic types (334 U/mL, P = .02). This was also true when mucinous tumors were excluded (870 U/mL versus 358 U/mL, P = .03). Of the 112 (79%) patients with stage III or IV cancers, the median preoperative CA 125 level (893 U/mL) was significantly higher than the 30 patients (21%) with FIGO stage I and II (174 U/mL, P = .001). Sixty-three patients (44%) had grade 1 or 2 cancers, and 79 (56%) had grade 3 tumors. Patients with grade 3 tumors had significantly higher median preoperative CA 125 levels compared with those with grade 1 or 2 (median CA 125 of 928 U/mL versus 323 U/mL, P < .001). One hundred eight patients (76%) had ascites and a median preoperative CA 125 of 893 U/mL. Thirty-four (24%) did not have ascites, and the median preoperative CA 125 level for these patients was 220 U/mL (P < .001). Patients with stage III or IV disease were more likely to have serous histology, grade 3 tumors, and ascites (all P values < .001).

Optimal surgical cytoreduction was achieved in 94 patients (66%). Patients who underwent optimal cytoreduction had a median preoperative CA 125 level of 399 U/mL. In contrast, for patients in whom optimal cytoreduction was not possible, the preoperative CA 125 was significantly higher (median = 1067 U/mL, P = .001). Among patients with stage III or IV disease, 65 of 112 (58%) underwent optimal surgical cytoreduction. Of this group, patients with optimal surgical cytoreduction had a median preoperative CA 125 of 715 U/mL, which was significantly lower than the 47 patients who underwent suboptimal cytoreduction (1095 U/mL, P = .03).

The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative CA 125 levels in predicting optimal cytoreduction was defined as percentage of optimally cytoreduced patients with CA 125 levels below a given cutoff (true-positive rate) and the percentage of suboptimally cytoreduced patients with a CA 125 level below that same cutoff, respectively. The results for all patients with cancer are shown in Table 2Go and Figure 1Go. At a cutoff of 500 U/mL, 82% of patients with a lower CA 125 were optimally cytoreduced. Of those with a level higher than 500 U/mL, 52% were still able to undergo optimal surgical cytoreduction. Even among patients with a preoperative CA 125 level above 4450 U/mL (90th percentile), 40% underwent optimal surgical cytoreduction. When examining the ability of preoperative CA 125 levels to predict level of cytoreduction in advanced-stage patients only, a high positive predictive value is observed; but the negative predictive value remains low (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Ability of Preoperative CA 125 to Predict Optimal Cytoreduction
 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve showing the relationship between true-positive rate (sensitivity) and false-positive rate (1 — specificity) for optimal cytoreduction using each serum CA 125 level as a cutoff point. The numbers shown on the figure are CA 125 levels (U/mL).

Cooper. Serum CA 125 and Outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2002.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Ability of Preoperative CA 125 to Predict Optimal Cytoreduction in Advanced Stage (III–IV)
 
The ability of preoperative CA 125 values to predict advanced-stage disease (FIGO stage III or IV) was evaluated. The results are shown in Table 4Go and Figure 2Go. Preoperative CA 125 levels have a high positive predictive value for predicting advanced stage at a given cutoff of CA 125, but a low negative predictive value.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Ability of Preoperative CA 125 to Predict Advanced Stage (III–IV)
 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic curve showing the relationship between true-positive rate (sensitivity) and false-positive rate (1 — specificity) for advanced-stage disease using each serum CA 125 level as a cutoff point. The numbers shown on the figure are CA 125 levels (U/mL).

Cooper. Serum CA 125 and Outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2002.

 
Seventy-five patients have died from ovarian cancer, and 67 were alive at last follow-up or died from other causes. The joint test of significance of the effects of age, histology, grade, stage, cytoreduction, and ascites on survival was highly significant (P < .001). By univariate analysis, increasing age (hazard ratio 1.04), serous histology (hazard ratio 2.99), high tumor grade (hazard ratio 2.37), advanced stage (hazard ratio 6.01), and presence of ascites (hazard ratio 6.89) were associated with poor survival (all P values < .001). Optimal cytoreduction was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.39, P < .001) by univariate analysis. Additionally, age (P < .05), serous histology (P = .03), and the presence of ascites (P = .008), were independently associated with poor outcome by the Cox proportional hazards model (Table 5Go). The patients were divided into groups of equal numbers of patients with CA 125 levels of <160, 160–399, 400–924, 925–2399, and 2400+ U/mL. When the patients were divided into five equal groups, after adjusting for the six covariates in the multivariable analysis, the joint effect of preoperative CA 125 was significant for survival (P = .03). The hazard ratio of each group of patients increased compared with the group of patients with the lowest level of CA 125, but in a nonlinear fashion (Figure 3Go). The patients with the highest preoperative serum levels of CA 125 (>2400 U/mL) had a relatively low hazard ratio as compared with the patients with intermediate levels (925–2399 U/mL). When CA 125 was included in the multivariate model with the six covariates noted above, increasing age (P = .01), serous histology (P = .01), presence of ascites (P = .02), and CA 125 (P = .03) were independent predictors of poor outcome.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Cox Proportional Hazards Model for the Effect of Preoperative CA 125 on Survival
 


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Hazard ratio of various groups of patients when compared to the group with the lowest preoperative CA 125 values. Group I = <160 U/mL; Group II = 160–399 U/mL; Group III = 400–924 U/mL; Group IV = 925–2399 U/mL; Group V = 2400+ U/mL.

Cooper. Serum CA 125 and Outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2002.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Despite the proven utility of serum CA 125 levels in monitoring disease status and progression in ovarian cancer patients,1,10 there is little information about the outcome of patients based on preoperative CA 125 levels. Previous studies have demonstrated that preoperative CA 125 levels correlate with survival in univariate analyses.20,21 Makar et al reported that a preoperative serum CA 125 level of 150 U/mL or less was associated with better survival in univariate but not in multivariate analyses.22 Nagele et al found that preoperative CA 125 levels were an independent prognostic factor in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer patients.2 Our data show that preoperative CA 125 levels are an independent risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer of all stages. This finding has recently been reported in primary fallopian tube cancer as well.23 Although stage I and II disease is known to be associated with better survival and lower CA 125 values, stage was controlled for in our multivariate analysis. Interestingly, patients with the highest pre-operative CA 125 levels had a relatively low risk of death due to disease. This may be because tumors that are actively growing have higher serum CA 125 levels and are more responsive to chemotherapy. It has been demonstrated that ovarian cancers associated with BRCA1 mutations have a favorable outcome compared with sporadic ovarian cancers.24,25 The human gene NBR1, identified using polyclonal sera to CA 125, was mapped to the BRCA1 region on chromosome 17q21.26 It is possible that BRCA1 inactivation leads to an upregulation of serum CA 125 levels, which may explain why the patients with the highest preoperative CA 125 levels had better survival. However, not all studies show improved survival in patients with germline BRCA1 mutations.27,28

Previous studies have shown that significant predictors of outcome in ovarian cancer patients include age, histologic subtype, grade, and volume of residual disease.29–32 Our study demonstrated a significant effect of increasing age, serous histology, high tumor grade, advanced stage, suboptimal cytoreduction, and presence of ascites on survival by univariate analysis. However, in the multivariate model, only increasing age, serous histology, presence of ascites, and CA 125 levels were significant. Advanced stage and high tumor grade were associated with a nonsignificant deleterious effect. Optimal cytoreduction was associated with better outcome, but this was not statistically significant. It is possible that with a larger cohort, level of cytoreduction and stage may be independent predictors of outcome. Most studies have not included preoperative CA 125 or presence of ascites in survival analyses,29–32 which may alter the significance of other covariates.

Preoperative CA 125 levels were previously shown to correlate with tumor stage and histologic grade.22,33–35 One study found a significant association of preoperative CA 125 levels with tumor stage and cytoreduction, but not histologic grade or type.20 Our data demonstrate a significant correlation of preoperative CA 125 levels with high stage, high tumor grade, histologic subtype, level of cytoreduction, and the presence of ascites, the latter of which has not been previously addressed.

Chi et al evaluated the ability of preoperative CA 125 levels to predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.18 They found that at a cutoff of 500 U/mL, 73% of patients with a preoperative CA 125 level lower than this value underwent optimal cytoreduction, whereas only 22% of patients with a higher preoperative CA 125 level were optimally cytoreduced. In our study, 82% of all patients with preoperative CA 125 levels less than 500 U/mL underwent optimal cytoreduction, whereas 52% of patients with preoperative CA 125 levels above 500 U/mL were optimally cytoreduced. When examining only those patients who had stage III or IV cancer, we found that 74% of those with preoperative CA 125 levels less than 500 U/mL underwent optimal cytoreduction, whereas 51% of patients with levels above 500 U/mL were optimally cytoreduced. Thus, preoperative CA 125 does not appear to be a reliable predictor of optimal cytoreduction.

In summary, preoperative CA 125 levels correlate significantly with tumor stage, grade, histologic type, cytoreduction, and presence or absence of ascites, and are an independent prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer.


    Footnotes
 
PII S0029-7844(02)02057-4

Received November 1, 2001. Received in revised form February 28, 2002. Accepted March 21, 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Bast RC Jr, Klug TL, St John E, Jenison E, Niloff JM, Lazarus H, et al. A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1983;309:883–7.[Abstract]

2. Nagele F, Petru E, Medl M, Kainz C, Graf AH, Sevelda P. Preoperative CA 125: An independent prognostic factor in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:259–64.[Abstract]

3. Barbieri RL, Niloff JM, Bast RC. Elevated serum concentrations of CA 125 in patients with advanced endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1986;45:630–4.[Medline]

4. Fedele L, Vercellini P, Arcaini L, Grazia de Dalt M, Candiani GB. CA 125 in serum, peritoneal fluid, active lesions, and endometrium of patients with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:166–70.[Medline]

5. Guidice LC, Jacobs A, Pineda J, Bell CE, Lippmann L. Serum levels of CA 125 in patients with endometriosis: A preliminary report. Fertil Steril 1986;45:876–8.[Medline]

6. Kauppila A, Telimass S, Ronberg L, Vuori J. Placebo-controlled study on serum concentrations of CA 125 before and after treatment of endometriosis with Danazol or high-dose medroxy-progesterone acetate alone or after surgery. Fertil Steril 1988;49:37–41.[Medline]

7. Patton PE, Field CS, Harms RW, Coulam CB. CA 125 level of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1986;45:770–3.[Medline]

8. Pittaway DE, Faye JA. The use of CA 125 in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1986;46: 790–5.[Medline]

9. Takahashi K, Yamane Y, Kijima S, Yoshino K, Shibukawa T, Kitao M. CA 125 antigen is an effective diagnostic for external endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1987;23:257–60.[Medline]

10. Buller RE, Vasilev S, DiSaia PJ. CA 125 kinetics: A cost-effective clinical tool to evaluate clinical trial outcomes in the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1241–54.[Medline]

11. O’Connell GJ, Ryan E, Murphy KJ, Prefontaine M. Predictive value of CA 125 for ovarian carcinoma in patients presenting with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70: 930–2.[Medline]

12. Vasilev SA, Schlaerh JB, Campeau J, Morrow CP. Serum CA 125 level in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:751–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Di-Xia C, Schwartz PE, Xinguo L, Zhan Y. Evaluation of CA 125 levels in differentiating malignant from benign tumors in patients with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:23–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Patsner B, Mann WJ, Cohen H, Loesch M. Predictive value of preoperative serum CA 125 levels in clinically localized and advanced endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:399–402.[Medline]

15. Malkasian GD Jr, Knapp RC, Lavin PT, Zurawski VR Jr, Podratz KC, Stanhope CR, et al. Preoperative evaluation of serum CA 125 levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with pelvic masses: Discrimination of benign from malignant disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:341–6.[Medline]

16. Soper JT, Hinter VJ, Daly L, Tanner M, Creasman WT, Bast RC. Preoperative serum tumor-associated antigen levels in women with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75: 249–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Welander CE. What do CA 125 and other antigens tell us about ovarian cancer biology?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992;71(Suppl 155):85–93.

18. Chi DS, Venkatraman ES, Masson V, Hoskins WJ. The ability of preoperative serum CA-125 to predict optimal primary tumor cytoreduction in stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2000;77:227–31.[Medline]

19. McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Geisler JP, Miller GA, Lee TH, Harwood RM, Wiemann MC, Geisler HE. Relationship of preoperative serum CA-125 to survival in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. J Reprod Med 1996;41:140–2.[Medline]

21. Möebus V, Kreienberg R, Crombach G, Weurz H, Caffier H, Kaesemann H, et al. Evaluation of CA 125 as a prognostic and predictive factor in ovarian cancer. J Tumor Marker Oncol 1988;3:251–8.

22. Makar APH, Kristensen GB, Kaern J, Bømer OP, Abeller VM, Tropé CG. Prognostic value of pre- and postoperative serum CA 125 levels in ovarian cancer: New aspects and multivariate analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:1002–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Hefler LA, Rosen AC, Graf AH, Lahousen M, Klein M, Leodolter S, et al. The clinical value of serum concentrations of cancer antigen 125 in patients with primary fallopian tube carcinoma: A multicenter study. Cancer 2000; 89:1555–60.[Medline]

24. Rubin SC, Benjamin I, Behbakht K, Takahashi H, Morgan MA, LiVolsi VA, et al. Clinical and pathological features of ovarian cancer in women with germ-line mutations of BRCA1. N Engl J Med 1996;335(19):1413–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Boyd J, Sonoda Y, Federici MG, Bogomolniy F, Rhei E, Maresco DL, et al. Clinicopathologic features of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer. JAMA 2000;283(17):2260–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Campbell IG, Nicoai HM, Foulkes WD, Senger G, Stamp GW, Allan G, et al. A novel gene encoding a B-box protein within the BRCA1 region at 17q21.1. Hum Mol Genet 1994;3:589–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Johannsson OT, Ranstam J, Borg A, Olsson H. Survival of BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer patients: A population-based study for southern Sweden. J Clin Oncol 1998;16: 397–404.[Abstract]

28. Pharoah PDP, Easton DF, Stockton DL, Gayther S, Ponder BAJ. Survival in familial, BRCA1-associated, and BRCA2-associated epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 1999;59:868–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Hoskins WJ, Bundy VN, Thigpen JT, Omura GA. The influence of cytoreductive surgery on recurrence-free interval and survival in small-volume stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1992; 47:159–66.[Medline]

30. Munkarah AR, Hallum AV, Morris M, Burke TW, Levenback C, Atkinson EN, et al. Prognostic significance of residual disease in patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997:64:13–7.[Medline]

31. Curtin JP, Malik R, Venkatraman ES, Barakat RR, Hoskins WJ. Stage IV ovarian cancer: Impact of surgical debulking. Gynecol Oncol 1997;64:9–12.[Medline]

32. Goodman HM, Harlow BL, Sheets EE, Muto MG, Brooks S, Steller M, et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of stage IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46:367–71.[Medline]

33. Zanaboni F, Vergadoro F, Presti M, Gallotti P, Lombardi F, Bolis G. Tumor antigen CA 125 as a marker of ovarian epithelial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1987;28:61–7.[Medline]

34. Fures R, Bukovic D, Hodek B, Klaric P, Herman R, Grybusic G. Preoperative tumor marker CA125 levels in relation to epithelial ovarian cancer stage. Coll Antropol 1999;23:189–94.[Medline]

35. But I, Goriek B. Preoperative value of CA 125 as a reflection of tumor grade in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996;63:166–72.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): e11 - e79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Van Calster, D. Timmerman, T. Bourne, A. C. Testa, C. Van Holsbeke, E. Domali, D. Jurkovic, P. Neven, S. Van Huffel, and L. Valentin
Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Specialist Ultrasound Examination Versus Serum CA-125
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1706 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Timmerman, B. Van Calster, D. Jurkovic, L. Valentin, A. C. Testa, J.-P. Bernard, C. Van Holsbeke, S. Van Huffel, I. Vergote, and T. Bourne
Inclusion of CA-125 Does Not Improve Mathematical Models Developed to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4194 - 4200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. N. Fader and P. G. Rose
Role of Surgery in Ovarian Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2873 - 2883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. E. Axtell, M. H. Lee, R. E. Bristow, S. C. Dowdy, W. A. Cliby, S. Raman, J. P. Weaver, M. Gabbay, M. Ngo, S. Lentz, et al.
Multi-Institutional Reciprocal Validation Study of Computed Tomography Predictors of Suboptimal Primary Cytoreduction in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 25(4): 384 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Y. Han, C. N. Landen Jr, A. A. Kamat, A. Lopez, D. P. Bender, P. Mueller, R. Schmandt, D. M. Gershenson, and A. K. Sood
Preoperative Serum Tissue Factor Levels Are an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Ovarian Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2006; 24(5): 755 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J.-i. Akahira, Y. Sugihashi, T. Suzuki, K. Ito, H. Niikura, T. Moriya, M. Nitta, H. Okamura, S. Inoue, H. Sasano, et al.
Decreased Expression of 14-3-3{sigma} Is Associated with Advanced Disease in Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Its Correlation with Aberrant DNA Methylation
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2687 - 2693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Mandelin, H. Lassus, M. Seppala, A. Leminen, J.-A. Gustafsson, G. Cheng, R. Butzow, and R. Koistinen
Glycodelin in Ovarian Serous Carcinoma: Association with Differentiation and Survival
Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6258 - 6264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. C. Cooper, J. M. Ritchie, C. L. W. Broghammer, J. Coffin, J. I. Sorosky, R. E. Buller, M. J. C. Hendrix, and A. K. Sood
Preoperative Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels: Significance in Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 3193 - 3197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Buller, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Buller, R. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS