Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;99:993-995
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vintzileos, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knuppel, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vintzileos, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knuppel, R. A.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Second-Trimester Genetic Sonography in Patients With Advanced Maternal Age and Normal Triple Screen

Anthony M. Vintzileos, MD, Edwin R. Guzman, MD, John C. Smulian, MD, MPH, Lami Yeo, MD, William E. Scorza, MD and Robert A. Knuppel, MD, MPH

From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ–Robert Wood Johnson Medical School/Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Address reprint requests to: Anthony M. Vintzileos, MD, UMDNJ—Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 254 Easton Avenue, MOB 4th Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0591; E-mail: vintziam{at}umdnj.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the value of second-trimester genetic sonography in detecting fetal Down syndrome in patients with advanced maternal age (at least 35 years) and normal triple screen.

METHODS: Since July 1999, a prospective collection and recording of all individual triple screen risks for fetal Down syndrome was initiated for all patients with advanced maternal age presenting in our ultrasound unit for second-trimester genetic sonography. Genetic sonography evaluated the presence or absence of multiple aneuploidy markers. Outcome information included the results of genetic amniocentesis, if performed, and the results of pediatric assessment and follow-up after birth.

RESULTS: By June 2001, 959 patients with advanced maternal age and normal triple screen were identified. Outcome information was obtained in 768 patients. The median risk for fetal Down syndrome based on maternal age was 1:213 (range 1:37–1:274). The median risk for fetal Down syndrome based on triple screen results was 1:1069 (range 1:275–1:40,000). A total of 673 patients had normal genetic sonography, and none (0%) had Down syndrome; 95 had one or more aneuploidy markers present, and four (4.2%) had fetuses with Down syndrome. The triple screen risks for these four fetuses ranged from 1:319 to 1:833.

CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with advanced maternal age and normal genetic sonography carried very little risk for Down syndrome. The use of genetic sonography may increase the detection rate of fetal Down syndrome in this group of pregnant women.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.