|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California; Eli Lilly and Co., Eli Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; The MEDSTAT Group, Washington, DC; and Genentech, South San Francisco, California.
Address reprint requests to: Barbara Sternfeld, PhD, Kaiser Permanente, Division of Research, 3505 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611; E-mail: bxs{at}dor.kaiser.org.
OBJECTIVE: To describe severity of emotional and physical symptoms in a large diverse sample; to examine demographic, health status, and behavioral correlates of symptom severity; and to describe use of medications and alternative remedies for premenstrual symptoms.
METHODS: A total of 1194 women, ages 2145, selected from members of a large northern California health maintenance organization, completed daily ratings of symptom severity for two menstrual cycles. An empirically derived algorithm defined symptom severity groups as minimal (n = 186), moderate (n = 801), severe (n = 151), or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (n = 56). Symptom severity as a continuous variable was defined by the two-cycle mean symptom ratings in the luteal phase. Demographic, health status, and behavioral factors and use of treatments for premenstrual symptoms were assessed by self-report.
RESULTS: Luteal phase symptom-specific ratings were generally significantly greater in the premenstrual dysphoric disorder group than in the other groups (P < .001). Symptom severity score increased with each comorbidity and decreased with each year of age. Symptom severity was also inversely associated with oral contraceptive use (emotional symptoms) and better perceived health (physical symptoms). Hispanics reported greater severity of symptoms, and Asians less, relative to whites. Use of herbal and nutritional supplements for premenstrual symptoms steadily increased from 10.8% in the minimal group to 30.4% in the premenstrual dysphoric disorder group (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The degree of premenstrual symptom severity varies in the population, is relatively constant within each woman over two consecutive cycles, particularly for emotional symptoms, and is influenced by age, race/ethnicity, and health status.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Hernandez and N. Sachs-Ericsson Ethnic Differences in Pain Reports and the Moderating Role of Depression in a Community Sample of Hispanic and Caucasian Participants With Serious Health Problems Psychosom Med, January 1, 2006; 68(1): 121 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Bertone-Johnson, S. E. Hankinson, A. Bendich, S. R. Johnson, W. C. Willett, and J. E. Manson Calcium and Vitamin D Intake and Risk of Incident Premenstrual Syndrome Arch Intern Med, June 13, 2005; 165(11): 1246 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Johnson Premenstrual Syndrome, Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder, and Beyond: A Clinical Primer for Practitioners Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2004; 104(4): 845 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |