|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Medical Center, Hong Kong, China.
Address reprint requests to: Gabriel M. Leung, MD, MPH, University of Hong Kong, Department of Community Medicine, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China; E-mail: gmleung{at}hku.hk.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of cesarean and forceps or vacuum delivery and parental smoking habits on the initiation and duration of breast-feeding.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, population-based birth cohort study in 1997. Data were collected on breast-feeding history, household smoking habits, method of delivery, and other demographic, obstetric, behavioral, and potential confounding variables via a standardized self-administered questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between method of birth (cesarean versus forceps or vacuum delivery versus normal vaginal birth) and either not initiating breast-feeding or doing so for less than 1 month. Among women who breast-fed for 1 month or more, multivariable survival analysis was employed to study the relationship between method of delivery and breast-feeding duration. We repeated these analyses to examine the link between parental smoking habits and breast-feeding initiation and duration.
RESULTS: A total of 7825 mother-infant pairs were followed up for 9 months. Cesarean delivery was a risk factor for not initiating breast-feeding, for breast-feeding less than 1 month, and remained a significant hazard against breast-feeding duration. Assisted delivery with forceps or vacuum, although not associated with breast-feeding initiation, was a significant risk against breast-feeding duration. Conversely, current parental smoking habits only affected breast-feeding initiation but were unrelated to breast-feeding duration.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates a possible effect of forceps or vacuum delivery on breast-feeding and of cesarean on long-term breast-feeding duration. The findings provide additional evidence in support of the avoidance of unnecessary obstetric interventions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Pasupathy and G. C S Smith Neonatal outcomes with caesarean delivery at term Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2008; 93(3): F174 - F175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Paul, E. B. Lehman, C. S. Hollenbeak, and M. J. Maisels Preventable Newborn Readmissions Since Passage of the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): 2349 - 2358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. B. Ahluwalia, B. Morrow, and J. Hsia Why Do Women Stop Breastfeeding? Findings From the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1408 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Leung, L.-M. Ho, and T.-H. Lam Secondhand Smoke Exposure, Smoking Hygiene, and Hospitalization in the First 18 Months of Life Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2004; 158(7): 687 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Leung, T.-H. Lam, L.-M. Ho, and T. Q. Thach Cesarean trends Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 1, 2002; 167(2): 124 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |