| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Address reprint requests to: Maureen Paul, MD, MPH, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, 1055 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215; E-mail: maureen_paul{at}pplm.org.
OBJECTIVE: To study if the pathologist’s examination of surgical abortion tissue offers more information than immediate fresh tissue examination by the surgeon. Immediate examination of the fresh tissue aspirate after surgical abortion helps reduce the risk of failed abortion and other complications. Regulations in some states also require a pathologist to analyze abortion specimens at added cost to providers. We conducted this study to evaluate the incremental clinical benefit of pathology examination after surgical abortion at less than 6 weeks’ gestation.
METHODS: As part of a prospective case series of women who had early surgical abortions at the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts during a 32-month period, we collected data on clinical outcomes and the results of postoperative tissue examinations. Using outcomes verified by in-person follow-up as the "gold standard," we calculated the validity of the tissue examinations by the surgeons and the outside pathologists.
RESULTS: A total of 676 women had documented outcomes and complete tissue examination data. The sensitivity (ability of the examiner to detect an outcome other than complete abortion) was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35, 76) for the surgeons’ tissue inspections and 22% (95% CI 8, 44) for the pathologists’ examinations. The predictive value of a positive (abnormal) tissue screen was 14% (95% CI 8, 24) and 7% (95% CI 3, 17) for the surgeons and pathologists, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Routine pathology examination of the tissue aspirate after early surgical abortion confers no incremental clinical benefit. Although the surgeons’ tissue inspections predicted abnormal outcomes poorly, the pathologists did no better. Our results challenge the rationale for state regulations requiring pathologic analysis of all surgical abortion specimens.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. J. Cameron and G. C. Penney Are national recommendations regarding examination and disposal of products of miscarriage being followed? A need for revised guidelines? Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 531 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Grimes and M. D. Creinin Induced Abortion: An Overview for Internists Ann Intern Med, April 20, 2004; 140(8): 620 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Grossman, C. Ellertson, D. A. Grimes, and D. Walker Routine Follow-up Visits After First-Trimester Induced Abortion Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2004; 103(4): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. S. Lichtenberg and S. Shott A Randomized Clinical Trial of Prophylaxis for Vacuum Abortion: 3 Versus 7 Days of Doxycycline Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2003; 101(4): 726 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Shanklin Is Pathology Examination Useful After Early Surgical Abortion? Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2002; 100(4): 830 - 831. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Lehrer, M. Paul, E. Lackie, C. Mitchell, A. Rogers, and M. Fox Is Pathology Examination Useful After Early Surgical Abortion? Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2002; 100(2): 378 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
