Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;99:548-552
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jazayeri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sincich, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jazayeri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sincich, T.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Is Meconium Passage a Risk Factor for Maternal Infection in Term Pregnancies?

Allahyar Jazayeri, MD, PhD, Mary K. Jazayeri, ARNP, Michelle Sahinler, MD and Terry Sincich, PhD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas; and Information Systems/Decision Sciences Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.

Address reprint requests to: Allahyar Jazayeri, MD, PhD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3601 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79430; E-mail: allahyar.jazayeri{at}ttmc.ttuhsc.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between meconium and maternal infection.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 678 pregnant women. All term deliveries during a 31-month period with meconium passage were included. Each meconium delivery was matched with a consecutive delivery without meconium at the same gestational age.

RESULTS: The overall infection rate was 16%, with 13% of the infections directly related to the pregnancy, labor, and delivery. The endometritis rate was 5%, with 7.1% and 3% in the meconium and no-meconium group, respectively. The chorioamnionitis rate was 8.3%, with 9.5% in the meconium and 7.1% in the no-meconium group. Factors found to be associated with overall obstetric infections had the following odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs): meconium (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1, 2.8), internal monitoring (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.9, 5.9), amnioinfusion (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3, 3.3), number of vaginal exams (OR 4.5, 95% CI 2.8, 7.1), length of labor (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8, 4.4), and cesarean (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9, 5.1). Logistic regression analyses revealed the following ORs and 95% CIs: 1) for endometritis–cesarean (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.9, 8.9), internal monitoring (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1, 5.9), and meconium (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1, 5.5), and 2) for chorioamnionitis–length of labor greater than 10 hours (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4, 5.6), number of vaginal exams greater than seven (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7, 6.6), and use of internal monitors (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2, 5.3).

CONCLUSION: Meconium passage increases the risk of post-partum endometritis but not chorioamnionitis. Length of labor, internal monitoring, and number of vaginal exams are risk factors for chorioamnionitis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.