Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;99:426-432
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harlow, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harlow, B. L.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Predictors of Subsequent Surgery for Uterine Leiomyomata After Abdominal Myomectomy

Elizabeth A. Stewart, MD, Adriana V. Faur, MD, Lauren A. Wise, MS, Raymond J. Reilly, MB and Bernard L. Harlow, PhD

From the Center for Uterine Fibroids and Ob/Gyn Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address reprint requests to: Elizabeth A. Stewart, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Center for Uterine Fibroids, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115; E-mail: eastewart{at}partners.org.

OBJECTIVE: To study factors associated with an increased risk of subsequent surgery in a cohort of women undergoing abdominal myomectomy.

METHODS: We followed 65 women undergoing abdominal myomectomy performed by the same experienced surgeon for a mean of 83.6 ± 35.0 months to assess the occurrence of both laparotomies and minimally invasive surgeries for uterine leiomyomas. Surgical and pathologic variables from the initial myomectomy as well as information on sociodemographic and anthropometric variables collected during a subsequent survey were correlated with the need for further surgery.

RESULTS: Women with uterine size greater than 12 menstrual weeks had a substantially reduced risk of undergoing a second surgery (multivariate hazard ratio 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.01, 0.4) compared with women having smaller uteri. Weight gain in excess of 30 pounds since age 18, relative to weight gain of 10 or fewer pounds is also associated with an increased risk of recurrent surgery (multivariate hazard ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 18.5).

CONCLUSION: Women with uterine size less than 12 menstrual weeks at the time of abdominal myomectomy may be at increased risk of second surgery. Weight gain after age 18 may also modify the risk of recurrent surgery. These changes may be related to the pathogenic mechanisms underlying myoma formation and growth.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. A. Stewart, B. Gostout, J. Rabinovici, H. S. Kim, L. Regan, C. M. C. Tempany, and for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Focused
Sustained Relief of Leiomyoma Symptoms by Using Focused Ultrasound Surgery
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2007; 110(2): 279 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. A. Stewart and C. C. Morton
The genetics of uterine leiomyomata: what clinicians need to know.
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2006; 107(4): 917 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. B. Spies, J. Bruno, F. Czeyda-Pommersheim, S. T. Magee, S. A. Ascher, and R. C. Jha
Long-Term Outcome of Uterine Artery Embolization of Leiomyomata
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2005; 106(5): 933 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Hanafi
Predictors of Leiomyoma Recurrence After Myomectomy
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2005; 105(4): 877 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
ABSTRACTS
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2003; 101(2): 413 - 415.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.