Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;99:395-400
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tolosa, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tolosa, J. E.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Has the Use of Routine Episiotomy Decreased? Examination of Episiotomy Rates From 1983 to 2000

Jay Goldberg, MD, David Holtz, MD, Terry Hyslop, PhD and Jorge E. Tolosa, MD, MS

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Research in Reproductive Health, and Biostatistics Section, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Address reprint requests to: Jay Goldberg, MD, Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Medical College, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19107; E-mail: jay.goldberg{at}mail.tju.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if practice patterns have been altered by the large body of literature strongly advocating the selective use of episiotomy.

METHODS: An electronic audit of the medical procedures database at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital from 1983 to 2000 was completed. Univariate and multivariable models were computed using logistic regression models.

RESULTS: Overall episiotomy rates in 34,048 vaginal births showed a significant reduction from 69.6% in 1983 to 19.4% in 2000. Significantly decreased risk of episiotomy was seen based upon year of childbirth (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86, 0.87), black race (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.28, 0.31), and spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.36, 0.45). Increased association with episiotomy was seen in forceps deliveries (OR 4.04, 95% CI 3.46, 4.72), and with third- or fourth-degree lacerations (OR 4.87, 95% CI 4.38, 5.41). In deliveries with known insurance status, having Medicaid insurance was also associated with a decreased episiotomy risk (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54, 0.64).

CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant reduction in the overall episiotomy rate between 1983 and 2000. White women consistently underwent episiotomy more frequently than black women even when controlling for age, parity, insurance status, and operative vaginal delivery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Alperin, M. A. Krohn, and K. Parviainen
Episiotomy and Increase in the Risk of Obstetric Laceration in a Subsequent Vaginal Delivery
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2008; 111(6): 1274 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. E. Allen and R. W. Hanson Jr
Episiotomy in Low-Risk Vaginal Deliveries
J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2005; 18(1): 8 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. M. Weber and L. Meyn
Episiotomy Use in the United States, 1979-1997
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2002; 100(6): 1177 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Routine Use of Episiotomy Is Decreasing
Journal Watch (General), April 5, 2002; 2002(405): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.