|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Address reprint requests to: Joseph P. Connor, MD, The University of Wisconsin, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H4/636 CSC, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792; E-mail: jpconnor{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether empiric treatment with vaginal metronidazole in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) on Papanicolaou smear increases the number of cases that regress to normal on repeated cytologic studies.
METHODS: A randomized double-masked trial was designed to compare women with ASCUS on screening Papanicolaou smear who received vaginal metronidazole, 37.5 mg twice daily, or placebo gel twice daily, for 5 days. Normalization of repeated Papanicolaou smear at 3 months was the primary end point. Regression to normal between the two groups was compared by
2 analysis. Power analysis required 45 women per study arm to demonstrate a 50% improvement in regression to normal among the metronidazole-treated women, at
= 0.05 and 80% power.
RESULTS: One hundred and six tubes of gel were dispensed, 54 metronidazole and 52 placebo. Eighty-four women (79%) returned for repeated cytologic examination at a mean of 6.5 months. Overall, 50 women (60%) had normal findings on repeated cytologic examination, and 34 (40%) had persistent abnormal findings. Twenty-two women had repeated ASCUS, and 11 had squamous intra-epithelial lesions (SIL) on repeated cytologic examination. Regression to normal was found in 22 (54%) metronidazole-treated women and 28 (65%) placebo recipients. The number of cases of repeated ASCUS (31% versus 25%) or SIL (15% versus 10%) were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Empiric vaginal metronidazole does not improve the management of women with ASCUS on Papanicolaou smear and should be discouraged.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Antibiotic Therapy for ASCUS Is Ineffective Journal Watch Women's Health, April 9, 2002; 2002(409): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |