Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;99:75-79
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Numazaki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Numazaki, M.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Dose-Range Effects of Propofol for Reducing Emetic Symptoms During Cesarean Delivery

Yoshitaka Fujii, MD and Mitsuko Numazaki, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, Japan.

Address reprint requests to: Yoshitaka Fujii, MD, University of Tsukuba Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan; E-mail: yfujii{at}igaku.md.tsukuba.ac.jp.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol at subhypnotic doses for reducing emetic symptoms in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS: In a randomized, double-masked trial, 80 patients received lidocaine intravenously 0.1 mg/kg (for injection pain relief) followed by either placebo or propofol at three different doses (0.5 mg/kg per hour, 1.0 mg/kg per hour, 2.0 mg/kg per hour) (n = 20 in each group) immediately after clamping of the umbilical cord. Emetic episodes and safety assessments were performed during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. To estimate a sufficient sample size, it was calculated that 20 patients per group would be required with {alpha} = .05 and ß = .2.

RESULTS: The rate of patients experiencing no emetic symptoms in an intraoperative, postdelivery period was 45% with propofol 0.5 mg/kg per hour (P = .5), 80% with propofol 1.0 mg/kg per hour (P = .011), and 80% with propofol 2.0 mg/kg per hour (P = .011), compared with placebo (40%). No clinically serious adverse events caused by the study drugs were observed.

CONCLUSION: Propofol 1.0 mg/kg per hour is the minimum effective subhypnotic dose for reducing emetic symptoms during cesarean delivery. Increasing the dose to 2.0 mg/kg per hour provides no further benefit.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.