Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001;98:833-836
© 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paraskevaidis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kitchener, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paraskevaidis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kitchener, H. C.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Human Papillomavirus Testing and the Outcome of Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Evangelos Paraskevaidis, MD, George Koliopoulos, MD, Yannis Alamanos, MD, Vasiliki Malamou-Mitsi, MD, Evangelos D. Lolis, MD and Henry C. Kitchener, MD, FRCOG

From the Department of Gynecology, Biostatistics and Cytopathology Laboratories, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece; and the Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to: Evangelos Paraskevaidis, MD, Visiting Professor, Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Mary’s Hospital, Whitworth Park, Manchester M13 0JH, United Kingdom; E-mail: vangelispar{at}hotmail.com.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether human papillomavirus (HPV) testing could be used in the follow-up after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 41 women who developed subsequent CIN after LLETZ (group A) and 82 women without CIN for a minimum of 5 years after LLETZ (group B). The first post-treatment cervical smear was retrieved and examined for high-risk HPV deoxyribonucleic acid. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio of HPV testing, first post-treatment Papanicolaou test, and excision margins for the detection of treatment failure were calculated. Multiple logistic regression analysis was also done.

RESULTS: The HPV test was positive in 38 of 41 women in group A and 13 of 82 in group B (P < .001). An abnormal cytologic result in the first post-treatment smear was found in 20 of 41 in group A and 11 of 82 in group B (P < .001). Sixteen women in group A and 18 in group B had involved margins (P = .046). Values for the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of the HPV test were 93%, 84%, 5.8, 0.08; for the Papanicolaou test they were 49%, 87%, 3.9, 0.586; and for margin status they were 39%, 78%, 1.8, 0.782, respectively. Positive HPV test presents significantly high odds ratio for treatment failure (P < .001), independent of cytology and margin status.

CONCLUSION: Women who postoperatively have positive HPV testing are at higher risk of treatment failure. This could be performed at the first post-treatment visit and further follow-up could be adjusted accordingly.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
D. Solomon
Chapter 14: Role of Triage Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, June 1, 2003; 2003(31): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
R. H. Kaufman
Is There a Role for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Clinical Practice?
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2001; 98(5): 724 - 725.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.