HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saisto, T. Articles by Halmesmäki, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saisto, T. Articles by Halmesmäki, E.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intervention in Fear of Childbirth

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; and the Department of Psychology, Jyväskylä University, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Address reprint requests to: T. Saisto, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 140 (Haartmaninkatu 2), FIN-00029 HUS (Helsinki), Finland; E-mail: terhi.saisto{at}hus.fi.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intensive and conventional therapy for severe fear of childbirth.

METHODS: In Finland, 176 women who had fear of childbirth were randomly assigned at the 26th gestational week to have either intensive therapy (mean 3.8 ± 1.0 sessions with obstetrician and one with midwife) or conventional therapy (mean 2.0 ± 0.6 sessions), with follow-up 3 months postpartum. Pregnancy-related anxiety and concerns, satisfaction with childbirth, and puerperal depression were assessed with specific questionnaires. Power analysis, based on previous studies, showed that 74 women per group were necessary to show a 50% reduction in cesarean rates.

RESULTS: Birth-related concerns decreased in the intensive therapy group but increased in the conventional therapy group (linear interaction between the group and birth-concerns P = .022). Labor was shorter in the intensive therapy group (mean ± standard deviation 6.8 ± 3.8 hours) compared with the conventional group (8.5 ± 4.8 hours, P = .039). After intervention, 62% of those originally requesting a cesarean (n = 117) chose to deliver vaginally, equally in both groups. Cesarean was more frequent for those who refused to fill in the questionnaires than for those who completed them (57% compared with 27%, P = .001). In the log-linear model, parous women who had conventional therapy and refused to fill in the questionnaires chose a cesarean more often than expected (standardized residual 2.54, P = .011). There were no differences between groups in satisfaction with childbirth or in puerperal depression.

CONCLUSION: Both kinds of therapy reduced unnecessary cesareans, more so in nulliparous and well-motivated women. With intensive therapy, pregnancy- and birth-related anxiety and concerns were reduced, and labors were shorter.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Poikkeus, T. Saisto, L. Unkila-Kallio, R.-L. Punamaki, L. Repokari, S. Vilska, A. Tiitinen, and M. Tulppala Fear of Childbirth and Pregnancy-Related Anxiety in Women Conceiving With Assisted Reproduction. Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2006; 108(1): 70 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-L. Dennis Psychosocial and psychological interventions for prevention of postnatal depression: systematic review BMJ, July 2, 2005; 331(7507): 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Queenan Elective Cesarean Delivery Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2004; 104(3): 631 - 631. [Full Text] [PDF]

				OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02) Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Young Intensive intervention for fear of childbirth did not reduce requests for caesarean section but decreased duration of vaginal labour Evid. Based Ment. Health, August 1, 2002; 5(3): 87 - 87. [Full Text] [PDF]