|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Magee-Womens Research Institute Family Planning Research Fund, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Address reprint requests to: Mitchell D. Creinin, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180; E-mail: mcreinin{at}mail.magee.edu.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical efficacy of mifepristone 100 mg followed 2 days later by misoprostol 400 µg orally or 800 µg vaginally in women at up to 49 days gestation.
METHODS: Eighty participants received mifepristone 100 mg and then were randomized to misoprostol, administered 48 hours later, at a dose of 400 µg orally (group 1) or 800 µg vaginally (group 2). Women returned for follow-up evaluations 24 ± 1 hour after using the misoprostol and then 23 weeks later. If abortion still had not occurred and the pregnancy was nonviable, the subject returned again after an additional 3 weeks.
RESULTS: Twenty-four hours after receiving misoprostol, 34 (85%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71%, 94%) of the 40 women in group 1 and 38 (95%; 95% CI 85%, 99%) of the 40 women in group 2 had complete abortions. Overall, complete abortion without surgical intervention occurred in 34 women in group 1 (85%; 95% CI 71%, 94%) and 40 women in group 2 (100%; 95% CI 91%, 100%; P = .03). Four women in group 1 required suction aspiration for continuing pregnancy at the second follow-up, compared with none in group 2 (P = .12). Side effects occurred with similar frequency in both treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose mifepristone (100 mg) combined with vaginal misoprostol 800 µg may be an effective alternative to regimens using 200 or 600 mg of mifepristone with misoprostol.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ben-Chetrit, T. Eldar-Geva, T. Lindenberg, M. Farhat, S. Shimonovitz, D. Zacut, H. Gelber, R. Sitruk-Ware, and I. M. Spitz Mifepristone does not induce cervical softening in non-pregnant women Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2372 - 2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02) Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Jain, C. Dutton, B. Harwood, K. R. Meckstroth, and D. R. Mishell Jr A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1477 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |