Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001;98:225-230
© 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Handa, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Handa, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, W. M.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Lacerations

Victoria L. Handa, MD, Beate H. Danielsen, PhD and William M. Gilbert, MD

From Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California; and Health Information Solutions, Redwood City, California.

Address reprint requests to: Victoria L. Handa, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Harvey 319, Baltimore, MD 21287.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the frequency of obstetric anal sphincter laceration and to identify characteristics associated with this complication, including modifiable risk factors.

METHODS: A population-based, retrospective study of over 2 million vaginal deliveries at California hospitals was performed, using information from birth certificates and discharge summaries for 1992 through 1997. We excluded preterm births, stillbirths, breech deliveries, and multiple gestations. The main outcome measure was obstetric anal sphincter laceration (third and fourth degree).

RESULTS: The frequency of anal sphincter lacerations was 5.85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.82, 5.88), decreasing significantly from 6.35% (95% CI 6.27, 6.43) in 1992 to 5.43% (95% CI 5.35, 5.51) in 1997 (P < .01). Using logistic regression analysis, we identified primiparity as the dominant risk factor (odds ratio [OR] for women with prior vaginal birth 0.15; 95% CI 0.14, 0.15). Birth weight over 4000 g was also highly significant (OR 2.17; 95% CI 2.07, 2.27). Lacerations occurred more often among women of certain racial and ethnic groups: Indian women (OR 2.5; 95% CI 2.23, 2.79) and Filipina women (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.50, 1.77) were at highest risk. Episiotomy decreased the likelihood of third-degree lacerations (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.78, 0.85), but increased the risk of fourth-degree lacerations (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.05, 1.19). Operative delivery increased the risk of sphincter laceration, with vacuum delivery (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.21, 2.40) presenting a greater risk than forceps delivery (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.37, 1.52).

CONCLUSION: Anal sphincter lacerations are strongly associated with primiparity, macrosomia, and operative vaginal delivery. Of the modifiable risk factors, operative vaginal delivery remains the dominant independent variable.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
N. Duggal, C. Mercado, K. Daniels, A. Bujor, A. B. Caughey, and Y. Y. El-Sayed
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Prevention of Postpartum Perineal Wound Complications: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2008; 111(6): 1268 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. Y. Wai, D. D. Rahn, A. B. White, and R. A. Word
Recovery of External Anal Sphincter Contractile Function After Prolonged Vaginal Distention or Sphincter Transection in an Animal Model
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2008; 111(6): 1426 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
V. L. Handa, M. E. Lockhart, J. R. Fielding, C. S. Bradley, L. Brubaker, G. W. Cundiff, W. Ye, H. E. Richter, and for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2008; 111(4): 914 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
M. Fitzpatrick and C. O'Herlihy
Postpartum care of the perineum
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), July 1, 2007; 9(3): 164 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
X. Fritel, V. Ringa, N. Varnoux, M. Zins, and G. Breart
Mode of Delivery and Fecal Incontinence at Midlife: A Study of 2,640 Women in the Gazel Cohort
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2007; 110(1): 31 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. Brubaker, C. S. Bradley, V. L. Handa, H. E. Richter, A. Visco, M. B. Brown, A. M. Weber, and for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Anal Sphincter Laceration at Vaginal Delivery: Is This Event Coded Accurately?
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2007; 109(5): 1141 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. P. FitzGerald, A. M. Weber, N. Howden, G. W. Cundiff, M. B. Brown, and for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Risk Factors for Anal Sphincter Tear During Vaginal Delivery
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2007; 109(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. DiPiazza, H. E. Richter, V. Chapman, S. P. Cliver, C. Neely, C. C. Chen, and K. L. Burgio
Risk Factors for Anal Sphincter Tear in Multiparas.
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2006; 107(6): 1233 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. M. Nichols, V. Ramakrishnan, E. J. Gill, and W. G. Hurt
Anal Incontinence in Women With and Those Without Pelvic Floor Disorders
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2005; 106(6): 1266 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. Guendelman, D. Thornton, J. Gould, and N. Hosang
Social Disparities in Maternal Morbidity During Labor and Delivery Between Mexican-Born and US-Born White Californians, 1996-1998
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2005; 95(12): 2218 - 2224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. M. Nichols, E. J. Gill, T. Nguyen, M. D. Barber, and W G. Hurt
Anal Sphincter Injury in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2004; 104(4): 690 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. R Patel and D. J Murphy
Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice
BMJ, May 29, 2004; 328(7451): 1302 - 1305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. I. Cedergren
Maternal Morbid Obesity and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2004; 103(2): 219 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
V. L. Handa, H. K. Pannu, S. Siddique, R. Gutman, J. VanRooyen, and G. Cundiff
Architectural Differences in the Bony Pelvis of Women With and Without Pelvic Floor Disorders
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2003; 102(6): 1283 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. Krebs and J. Langhoff-Roos
Elective Cesarean Delivery for Term Breech
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2003; 101(4): 690 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
P. S. Romano, J. J. Geppert, S. Davies, M. R. Miller, A. Elixhauser, and K. M. McDonald
A National Profile Of Patient Safety In U.S. Hospitals
Health Aff., March 1, 2003; 22(2): 154 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.