HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by VARMA, R. Articles by KUNDE, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by VARMA, R. Articles by KUNDE, D.

Vaginal Route as the Norm When Planning Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: Change in Practice

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basildon & Thurrock General Hospitals, Basildon, UK, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, London, UK.

Address reprint requests to: Rajiv Varma, MRCOG Basildon Hospital Consultant Gynecologist Nether Mayne Basildon Essex, SS16 5NL United Kingdom E-mail: rvarma80{at}hotmail.com

Objective: To investigate if a deliberate decision to carry out as many hysterectomies as possible by the vaginal route can be effective in increasing the proportion of vaginal hysterectomies for benign conditions in the absence of prolapse.

Methods: Practice over 5 years at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom was studied. Patients with prolapse, adnexal disease, leiomyoma larger than 16 weeks, and malignancy were excluded, leaving 272 hysterectomies of 553 originally. Change in the route of hysterectomy, the main endpoint, was observed at yearly intervals.

Results: At the start of the study, the route of surgery was 68% abdominal and 32% vaginal. By the end of the fifth year the pattern was 5% abdominal 95% vaginal. The conversion from vaginal to abdominal hysterectomy occurred in only two cases during the study period. There was no change in the case mix during this period. In the fifth year of study most associated oophorectomies were also performed vaginally. There was no increase in patient morbidity.

Conclusion: A major determinant of the route of hysterectomy is not the clinical situation but the attitude of the surgeon. There is no need for extra training and special skills or complicated equipment for vaginal hysterectomy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kotaska Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery BMJ, October 30, 2004; 329(7473): 1039 - 1042. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. H. Harmanli, R. Khilnani, V. Dandolu, and A. J. Chatwani Narrow Pubic Arch and Increased Risk of Failure for Vaginal Hysterectomy Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2004; 104(4): 697 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S R. Kovac Transvaginal Hysterectomy: Rationale and Surgical Approach Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2004; 103(6): 1321 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Levy and L. Emery Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2003; 102(1): 147 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Quinn, R. Varma, S. Tahseen, A. V. Lokugamage, and D. Kunde Complications of Hysterectomy Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2001; 98(3): 518 - 519. [Full Text] [PDF]