Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;96:979-985
© 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EGAN, J. F. X.
Right arrow Articles by VINTZILEOS, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EGAN, J. F. X.
Right arrow Articles by VINTZILEOS, A. M.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Efficacy of Screening for Fetal Down Syndrome in the United States From 1974 to 1997

JAMES F. X. EGAN, MD, PETER BENN, PhD, ADAM F. BORGIDA, MD, JOHN F. RODIS, MD, WINSTON A. CAMPBELL, MD and ANTHONY M. VINTZILEOS, MD

From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Objective: To estimate the 16-week prevalence of Down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997 and to determine the efficacy of maternal age cutoffs and triple screens for detecting it antenatally.

Methods: Using natality statistics for the United States from 1974 to 1997 of maternal-age–specific live births to women 13–49 years old, we evaluated advanced maternal age (35–49 years at delivery) and the triple serum test (maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, and unconjugated estriol) as screening tests for Down syndrome. Efficacy was evaluated using sensitivity, false-positive rate, positive predictive value, and likelihood ratio (likelihood ratio = sensitivity/false-positive rate).

Results: In 1974, the estimated second-trimester prevalence of Down syndrome was one in 740, but by 1997 that had increased to one in 504. The proportion of Down syndrome fetuses at 16 weeks’ gestation in women 35–49 years old increased from 28.5% in 1974 to 47.3% in 1997. However, live births to women 35–49 years old increased more rapidly from 4.7% in 1974 to 12.6% in 1997. The likelihood ratio for maternal age to identify an affected pregnancy decreased during the study period and was substantially lower than that using the serum test.

Conclusion: A maternal age cutoff of 35 years in the 1990s resulted in high false-positive rates and was less efficacious based on likelihood ratio and positive predictive value. Serum testing of all pregnant women would reduce the number of amniocenteses and decrease procedure-related losses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Kuppermann, L. A. Learman, E. Gates, S. E. Gregorich, R. F. Nease Jr, J. Lewis, and A. E. Washington
Beyond Race or Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: Predictors of Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2006; 107(5): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. A. Benn, J. F. X. Egan, M. Fang, and R. Smith-Bindman
Changes in the Utilization of Prenatal Diagnosis
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2004; 103(6): 1255 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Kumar and A. O'Brien
Recent developments in fetal medicine
BMJ, April 24, 2004; 328(7446): 1002 - 1006.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. G. Pinette, J. F.X. Egan, J. R. Wax, J. Blackstone, A. Cartin, and P. A. Benn
Combined Sonographic and Biochemical Markers for Down Syndrome Screening
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2003; 22(11): 1185 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. A. Benn, M. Fang, J. F. X. Egan, D. Horne, and R. Collins
Incorporation of Inhibin-A in Second-Trimester Screening for Down Syndrome
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2003; 101(3): 451 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. A. Benn, L. M. Kaminsky, J. Ying, A. F. Borgida, and J. F. X. Egan
Combined Second-Trimester Biochemical and Ultrasound Screening for Down Syndrome
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2002; 100(6): 1168 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. M. Vintzileos, E. R. Guzman, J. C. Smulian, L. Yeo, W. E. Scorza, and R. A. Knuppel
Second-Trimester Genetic Sonography in Patients With Advanced Maternal Age and Normal Triple Screen
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2002; 99(6): 993 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Nyberg, J. F. X. Egan, J. F. Rodis, P. A. Benn, R. O. Bahado-Singh, I. Mendilcioglu, J. Copel, R. Smith-Bindman, and J. D. Goldberg
Ultrasound Markers of Fetal Down Syndrome
JAMA, June 13, 2001; 285(22): 2856 - 2858.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.