|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Objective: To estimate the 16-week prevalence of Down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997 and to determine the efficacy of maternal age cutoffs and triple screens for detecting it antenatally.
Methods: Using natality statistics for the United States from 1974 to 1997 of maternal-agespecific live births to women 1349 years old, we evaluated advanced maternal age (3549 years at delivery) and the triple serum test (maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, and unconjugated estriol) as screening tests for Down syndrome. Efficacy was evaluated using sensitivity, false-positive rate, positive predictive value, and likelihood ratio (likelihood ratio = sensitivity/false-positive rate).
Results: In 1974, the estimated second-trimester prevalence of Down syndrome was one in 740, but by 1997 that had increased to one in 504. The proportion of Down syndrome fetuses at 16 weeks gestation in women 3549 years old increased from 28.5% in 1974 to 47.3% in 1997. However, live births to women 3549 years old increased more rapidly from 4.7% in 1974 to 12.6% in 1997. The likelihood ratio for maternal age to identify an affected pregnancy decreased during the study period and was substantially lower than that using the serum test.
Conclusion: A maternal age cutoff of 35 years in the 1990s resulted in high false-positive rates and was less efficacious based on likelihood ratio and positive predictive value. Serum testing of all pregnant women would reduce the number of amniocenteses and decrease procedure-related losses.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kuppermann, L. A. Learman, E. Gates, S. E. Gregorich, R. F. Nease Jr, J. Lewis, and A. E. Washington Beyond Race or Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: Predictors of Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome. Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2006; 107(5): 1087 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Benn, J. F. X. Egan, M. Fang, and R. Smith-Bindman Changes in the Utilization of Prenatal Diagnosis Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2004; 103(6): 1255 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kumar and A. O'Brien Recent developments in fetal medicine BMJ, April 24, 2004; 328(7446): 1002 - 1006. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Pinette, J. F.X. Egan, J. R. Wax, J. Blackstone, A. Cartin, and P. A. Benn Combined Sonographic and Biochemical Markers for Down Syndrome Screening J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2003; 22(11): 1185 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Benn, M. Fang, J. F. X. Egan, D. Horne, and R. Collins Incorporation of Inhibin-A in Second-Trimester Screening for Down Syndrome Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2003; 101(3): 451 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Benn, L. M. Kaminsky, J. Ying, A. F. Borgida, and J. F. X. Egan Combined Second-Trimester Biochemical and Ultrasound Screening for Down Syndrome Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2002; 100(6): 1168 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Vintzileos, E. R. Guzman, J. C. Smulian, L. Yeo, W. E. Scorza, and R. A. Knuppel Second-Trimester Genetic Sonography in Patients With Advanced Maternal Age and Normal Triple Screen Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2002; 99(6): 993 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Nyberg, J. F. X. Egan, J. F. Rodis, P. A. Benn, R. O. Bahado-Singh, I. Mendilcioglu, J. Copel, R. Smith-Bindman, and J. D. Goldberg Ultrasound Markers of Fetal Down Syndrome JAMA, June 13, 2001; 285(22): 2856 - 2858. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |