Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;96:727-731
© 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COHN, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by MUTCH, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COHN, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by MUTCH, D. G.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in Obese Women

DAVID E. COHN, MD, ELIZABETH M. SWISHER, MD, THOMAS J. HERZOG, MD, JANET S. RADER, MD and DAVID G. MUTCH, MD

From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Address reprint requests to: David E. Cohn, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Washington University School of Medicine Box 8064 4911 Barnes Hospital Plaza St. Louis, MO 63110 E-mail: cohnd{at}msnotes.wustl.edu

Objective: To estimate the morbidity, adequacy of surgery, and survival of obese women undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Methods: Patients with stage I and IIa cervical cancer and a body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m2 and absolute weight greater than 85 kg explored with the intent for radical hysterectomy between 1986 and 1998 were identified. Patient characteristics, surgical, pathologic, and follow-up data were extracted and survival curves were generated.

Results: Forty-eight obese women were identified who were explored for radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. The median BMI was 36 kg/m2, and the median weight was 95 kg. Thirty-five patients (73%) had stage Ib1 disease. Despite the obesity of the study group, none had severe comorbidity. The procedure was completed in 46 patients, and abandoned in two because of metastatic disease. For patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, median blood loss was 800 mL. No patient developed fistulas. Residual tumor was present in 26 (57%) hysterectomy specimens, and margins were without disease in 45 specimens (98%). A median of 26 pelvic lymph nodes were obtained per procedure, and six patients (13%) had positive nodes. Five-year overall and disease-free survival are 84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.9, 97.5) and 80% (95% CI 65.2, 93.8), respectively, at a median follow-up of 36 months.

Conclusion: In this carefully selected obese group, we demonstrate that radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed with adequate surgical resection, acceptable morbidity, and excellent survival.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Frumovitz, C. C. Sun, A. Jhingran, K. M. Schmeler, R. dos Reis, M. R. Milam, P. T. Soliman, K. Taylor, and P. T. Ramirez
Radical Hysterectomy in Obese and Morbidly Obese Women With Cervical Cancer
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2008; 112(4): 899 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Menopause IntHome page
G. Lane
Obesity and gynaecological cancer
Menopause Int, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 33 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.