Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;96:565-570
© 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MACPHAIL, A.
Right arrow Articles by WOLFE, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MACPHAIL, A.
Right arrow Articles by WOLFE, L. A.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Maximal Exercise Testing in Late Gestation: Fetal Responses

ANNE MACPHAIL, BNSc, GREGORY A. L. DAVIES, MD, RAHI VICTORY, MD and LARRY A. WOLFE, PhD

From the School of Physical and Health Education and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Physiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Address reprint requests to: Larry A. Wolfe, PhD School of Physical and Health Education Queen’s University Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada

Objective: To determine the fetal response to and safety of maximal maternal exercise in the third trimester.

Methods: Twenty-three active women with uncomplicated pregnancies (singleton gestations) underwent maximal exercise testing in late gestation using a progressive maximal cycle ergometer protocol. Fetal heart rate (FHR) responses were monitored and classified using National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines. Statistical analyses involved use of the Student t test, repeated measures analysis of variance with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons posttest, and the {chi}2 test.

Results: There was an increase in baseline FHR in the 20-minute posttest period compared with the 20-minute pretest period. There were significantly fewer accelerations in the second posttest 10-minute segment compared with the second pretest 10-minute segment. Variability was reduced in both posttest periods compared with the first 10-minute pretest period. Time to reactivity increased after testing. Mild tachycardia was noted in two tracings and bradycardia occurred in a fetus with previously undiagnosed growth restriction. There were no abnormal neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: Maximal exercise testing in late gestation led to minimal changes in FHR. Fetal bradycardiac responses were not seen in appropriate for gestational age fetuses, suggesting that brief maximal maternal exertion for research or diagnostic purposes is safe in this group.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
I. A. Santos, R. Stein, S. C. Fuchs, B. B. Duncan, J. P. Ribeiro, L. R. Kroeff, M. T. Carballo, and M. I. Schmidt
Aerobic Exercise and Submaximal Functional Capacity in Overweight Pregnant Women: A Randomized Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2005; 106(2): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. P. HEENAN, L. A. WOLFE, and G. A. L. DAVIES
Maximal Exercise Testing in Late Gestation: Maternal Responses
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2001; 97(1): 127 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.