|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Address reprint requests to: Jan EU Persson, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Lund S-221 85 Sweden E-mail: jan.persson{at}gyn.lu.se.
Objective: To evaluate obstetric and maternal risk factors for stress urinary incontinence.
Methods: We linked three national, Swedish, population-based registries with the use of unique personal identification numbers. All women born between 1932 and 1977 and operated on for stress urinary incontinence between 1987 and 1996 were identified from the Hospital Discharge Registry. This information was linked with the Medical Birth Registry (for the years 19731995), containing information on antenatal care, delivery, and the newborn, and the Fertility Registry (for the years 19321997), containing information on the number of children delivered by each Swedish woman. For determination of odds ratios (ORs) and approximate 95% confidence intervals (CIs), we used the Mantel-Haenszel method and a test-based method after suitable stratifications and exclusions.
Results: Diabetes mellitus, body mass index (BMI), age at first delivery, parity, birth weight, and epidural analgesia were positively associated with incontinence surgery. In contrast, cesarean delivery, forceps/vacuum extraction, and episiotomy were negatively associated with incontinence surgery. No association was found between surgery for stress incontinence and age at last delivery, smoking during pregnancy, level of education, multiple birth, large perineal tear, or breech presentation at any vaginal delivery. The OR for incontinence surgery was similarly decreased for nulliparous women and for uniparous women delivered by elective cesarean.
Conclusion: Vaginal delivery, notably the first, is strongly associated with later surgery for stress incontinence, but the association is modified by maternal conditions and interventions during delivery. No association was found between surgery for stress incontinence and pregnancy per se.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Visco, M. Viswanathan, K. N. Lohr, M. E. Wechter, G. Gartlehner, J. M. Wu, R. Palmieri, M. J. Funk, L. Lux, T. Swinson, et al. Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2006; 108(6): 1517 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Lukacz, J. M. Lawrence, R. Contreras, C. W. Nager, and K. M. Luber Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders. Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2006; 107(6): 1253 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Holroyd-Leduc and S. E. Straus Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women: Scientific Review JAMA, February 25, 2004; 291(8): 986 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Krebs and J. Langhoff-Roos Elective Cesarean Delivery for Term Breech Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2003; 101(4): 690 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Rortveit, A. K. Daltveit, Y. S. Hannestad, S. Hunskaar, and the Norwegian EPINCONT Study Urinary Incontinence after Vaginal Delivery or Cesarean Section N. Engl. J. Med., March 6, 2003; 348(10): 900 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Nygaard, C. Turvey, T. L. Burns, E. Crischilles, and R. Wallace Urinary Incontinence and Depression in Middle-Aged United States Women Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2003; 101(1): 149 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Chiarelli and J. Cockburn Promoting urinary continence in women after delivery: randomised controlled trial BMJ, May 25, 2002; 324(7348): 1241 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Rortveit, Y. S. Hannestad, A. K. Daltveit, and S. Hunskaar Age- and Type-Dependent Effects of Parity on Urinary Incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT Study Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2001; 98(6): 1004 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Episiotomy and Operative Delivery Prevent Stress Urinary Incontinence Journal Watch Women's Health, October 3, 2000; 2000(1003): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |