|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Pathology, Womens and Children Hospital at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Clinical Research Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia; Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Inc., Princeton, New Jersey; and Department of Pathology, Womens and Children Hospital at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Address reprint requests to: Robert J. Kurman, MD Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Pathology The Johns Hopkins Hospital 600 North Wolfe Street, Room 709 Baltimore, MD 21287
Objective: To identify the lowest effective continuous dose of norethindrone acetate that significantly reduces 12-month incidence of endometrial hyperplasia associated with unopposed 17ß-estradiol (E2), 1 mg.
Methods: In a double-masked, randomized, multicenter study, 1176 healthy postmenopausal women 45 years of age or older without evidence of endometrial abnormalities were given 12 months of treatment with unopposed E2, 1 mg, or continuous-combined regimens of E2, 1 mg, and norethindrone acetate, 0.1 mg, 0.25 mg, or 0.5 mg. Endometrial histology was evaluated at the end of the treatment period.
Results: Continuous-combined E2-norethindrone acetate regimens significantly reduced 12-month incidence of endometrial hyperplasia compared with unopposed E2 1 mg (P < .001). Endometrial hyperplasia occurred in 14.6% of women treated with unopposed E2 1 mg, whereas in all continuous-combined groups, the rate decreased to less than 1%. Among patients who received E2-norethindrone acetate 0.1 mg, incidence was 0.8%; among those who received 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg, it was 0.4%.
Conclusion: Continuous norethindrone acetate at doses as low as 0.1 mg combined with E2 1 mg effectively negated risk for endometrial hyperplasia associated with unopposed E2 1 mg, at least for the first year of therapy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. M. Horne and D. L. Blithe Progesterone receptor modulators and the endometrium: changes and consequences Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 567 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Ovarian, Endometrial, and Colorectal Cancers Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2004; 104(4_suppl): 77S - 84S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wells, D. W Sturdee, D. H Barlow, L. G Ulrich, K. O'Brien, M. J Campbell, M. P Vessey, and A. J Bragg Effect on endometrium of long term treatment with continuous combined oestrogen-progestogen replacement therapy: follow up study BMJ, August 3, 2002; 325(7358): 239 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. HOLINKA Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials in Hormone Replacement Therapy Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2001; 943(1): 89 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |