Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;96:157-161
© 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SONG, T.-B.
Right arrow Articles by KIM, E.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SONG, T.-B.
Right arrow Articles by KIM, E.-K.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Fetal Weight Prediction by Thigh Volume Measurement With Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography

TAE-BOK SONG, MD, THOMAS R. MOORE, MD, JI-YOUNG LEE, MD, YOON-HA KIM, MD and EUN-KYUNG KIM, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University, the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chosun University Medical School, Kwangju, Korea; and the Division of Perinatal Medicine, Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.

Address reprint requests to: Tae-Bok Song, MD Chonnam National University Medical School Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 8 Hakdong, Dongku Kwangju, 501-190 Korea E-mail: tbsong{at}chonnam.chonnam.ac.kr

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of a simple method of predicting fetal weight by measuring fetal thigh volume with three-dimensional ultrasonography.

Methods: In 84 pregnant women, fetuses without structural or chromosomal anomalies were studied prospectively and cross-sectionally. Biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were measured by two-dimensional ultrasound. Fetal thigh volume was measured by three-dimensional ultrasound, using three cross-sectional images of femur, from proximal, middle, and distal parts of femur diaphysis. Infants were delivered within 48 hours after ultrasound examinations.

Results: Modified thigh volume measurements using three cross-sectional images of femur by three-dimensional ultrasound were correlated strongly with birth weight (R2 = 0.921, P < .001). Using linear and polynomial regression, we calculated a new best-fit formula: Birth weight (g) = 165.32 + 28.78 x modified thigh volume (mL). The mean and standard deviation of the residual were 121.8 and 110.4, respectively, in three-dimensional formulas, which were significantly smaller than those of two-dimensional formulas.

Conclusion: Thigh volume measurement using three cross-sectional images of femur by three-dimensional ultrasound was simple, and there was better accuracy with this method than with two-dimensional ultrasound methods for predicting fetal weight during the third trimester of pregnancy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. F. Goncalves, W. Lee, J. Espinoza, and R. Romero
Three- and 4-Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetric Practice: Does It Help?
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1599 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.