Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;95:623-635
© 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mozurkewich, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mozurkewich, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, F. M.

REVIEW

WORKING CONDITIONS AND ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOME: A META-ANALYSIS

Ellen L. Mozurkewich, MD, Barbara Luke, ScD, MPH, Michal Avni, MPH and Fredric M. Wolf, PhD

From the Health Sciences Research, Divisions of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and the Departments of Medical Education and Health Services, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington.

Address reprint requests to: Ellen L. Mozurkewich, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1500 East Medical Drive, Mott Hospital F4385, Box 0264, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0264, E-mail: mozurk{at}umich.edu

Objective: To evaluate the association between working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcomes by performing a meta-analysis of published studies.

Data Sources: We searched the English-language literature in MEDLINE through August 1999 using the terms standing, posture, work, workload, working conditions, shift, occupational exposure, occupational diseases, lifting, pregnancy complications, pregnancy, small for gestational age (SGA), fetal growth retardation (FGR), preterm, and labor.

Methods of Study Selection: We included observational studies evaluating the effect of one or more of the following work-related exposures on adverse pregnancy outcome: physically demanding work, prolonged standing, long work hours, shift work, and cumulative work fatigue score. Outcomes of interest were preterm birth, hypertension or preeclampsia, and SGA.

We conducted a meta-analysis based on 160,988 women in 29 studies to evaluate the association of physically demanding work, prolonged standing, long working hours, shift work, and cumulative work fatigue score with preterm birth. Also analyzed were the associations of physically demanding work with hypertension or preeclampsia and SGA infants. The data were analyzed using the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Physically demanding work was significantly associated with preterm birth (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16, 1.29), SGA (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.30, 1.44), and hypertension or preeclampsia (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.30, 1.96). Other occupational exposures significantly associated with preterm birth included prolonged standing (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13, 1.40), shift and night work (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06, 1.46), and high cumulative work fatigue score (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33, 1.98). We found no significant association between long work hours and preterm birth (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92, 1.16).

Conclusion: Physically demanding work may significantly increase a woman’s risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
C Bambra, M Whitehead, A Sowden, J Akers, and M Petticrew
"A hard day's night?" The effects of Compressed Working Week interventions on the health and work-life balance of shift workers: a systematic review
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2008; 62(9): 764 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Croteau, S. Marcoux, and C. Brisson
Work Activity in Pregnancy, Preventive Measures, and the Risk of Preterm Delivery
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2007; 166(8): 951 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M. Bonzini, D. Coggon, and K. T Palmer
Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: a systematic review
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2007; 64(4): 228 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. F. Saftlas, N. Logsden-Sackett, W. Wang, R. Woolson, and M. B. Bracken
Work, Leisure-Time Physical Activity, and Risk of Preeclampsia and Gestational Hypertension
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2004; 160(8): 758 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M J Saurel-Cubizolles, J Zeitlin, N Lelong, E Papiernik, G C Di Renzo, and G Breart
Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: results from the Europop case-control survey
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, May 1, 2004; 58(5): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J L Zhu, N H Hjollund, H Boggild, and J Olsen
Shift work and subfecundity: a causal link or an artefact?
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2003; 60(9): e12 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. M. FRAZIER, A. L. GOLBECK, and L. LIPSCOMB
Medically Recommended Cessation of Employment Among Pregnant Women in Georgia
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2001; 97(6): 971 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2000; 3(4): 106 - 112.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Working Conditions May Affect Pregnancy Outcomes
Journal Watch (General), April 28, 2000; 2000(428): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.