HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grimes, D. A. Articles by Raymond, E. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grimes, D. A. Articles by Raymond, E. G.

BUNDLING A PREGNANCY TEST WITH THE YUZPE REGIMEN OF EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION

From Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Address reprint requests to: David A. Grimes, MD Family Health International PO Box 13950 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 E-mail: dgrimes{at}fhi.org

The recent United States Food and Drug Administration approval of a commercial kit containing the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception is a welcome event. Unlike emergency contraceptive pills sold in other countries, however, the United States product has a pregnancy test bundled with the pills. The test could identify existing pregnancies and avoid unnecessary use of the pills, although any protection against lawsuits alleging injury to an embryo is speculative. Conversely, no major medical organization recommends routine pregnancy testing before using emergency contraceptive pills. The test might stigmatize the Yuzpe regimen as being dangerous to an embryo. Difficulty in understanding the pregnancy test instructions could, paradoxically, deter some women from using the pills after having bought them. The bulky size of the pregnancy test reagent stick makes the package indiscreet, and the test adds unnecessary cost to emergency contraception. The greatest usefulness of the test could be to confirm or exclude a pregnancy several weeks after taking the pills, rather than before. If bundling an unnecessary test with emergency contraception is the only way to bring this useful product to the United States market, then the public health benefits could outweigh the disadvantages. However, this approach sets a worrisome precedent and further isolates the United States from the international medical community.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Westhoff Emergency Contraception N. Engl. J. Med., November 6, 2003; 349(19): 1830 - 1835. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Grimes and E. G. Raymond Emergency Contraception Ann Intern Med, August 6, 2002; 137(3): 180 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. TRUSSELL, V. DURAN, T. SHOCHET, and K. MOORE Access to Emergency Contraception Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2000; 95(2): 267 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]