Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;94:83-88
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TARNAY, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by MUNRO, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TARNAY, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by MUNRO, M. G.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Entry Force and Intra-abdominal Pressure Associated With Six Laparoscopic Trocar-Cannula Systems: A Randomized Comparison

CHRISTOPHER M. TARNAY, MD, KAREN B. GLASS, MD and MALCOLM G. MUNRO, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Address reprint requests to: Malcolm G. Munro, MD, Olive View UCLA Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14445 Olive View Drive, Suite 2B-163, Sylmar, CA 91324-1495, E-mail: mmunro{at}obgyn.medsch.ucla.edu

Objective: In trocar-cannula systems, increased entry force could result in loss of operator control, a potential cause of serious visceral and vascular injuries. We developed a system to measure entry force and intraperitoneal pressure to evaluate and compare trocar-cannula systems.

Methods: Six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems of similar diameter (12 mm) were tested (two pyramidal, two cutting-dilating, and two blunt conical) using a white swine model. All six systems were inserted into each of 12 subjects with location designated by random allotment (72 insertions). During each insertion, intraperitoneal pressure and entry force were measured using a system consisting of a gas-gas transducer, a 50-lb load cell, and a multichannel data acquisition board. Mean entry force and intraperitoneal pressure were compared using mixed-model analysis of variance.

Results: Mean entry force measurements were as follows: pyramidal 9.01 lb and 13.48 lb, cutting-dilating 9.94 lb and 16.46 lb, and blunt conical 19.15 lb and 31.91 lb. Intraperitoneal pressure changes generally reflected measured entry force.

Conclusion: The system successfully measured both entry force and resultant intraperitoneal pressure. Pyramidal trocar-cannula systems required the lowest force for entry. These differences in entry force have potential clinical implications related to the risk of visceral and vascular injury. Intraperitoneal pressure measurement could be used as a surrogate for insertional force measurement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SURG INNOVHome page
D. M. Shafer, Y. Khajanchee, J. Wong, and L. L. Swanstrom
Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size.
Surgical Innovation, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 183 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. G. Munro and C. M. Tarnay
The Impact of Trocar-Cannula Design and Simulated Operative Manipulation on Incisional Characteristics: A Randomized Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2004; 103(4): 681 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.