Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;93:943-947
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OVERPECK, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by KLEBANOFF, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OVERPECK, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by KLEBANOFF, M. A.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Birth Weight for Gestational Age of Mexican American Infants Born in the United States

MARY D. OVERPECK, DrPH, MARY L. HEDIGER, PhD, JUN ZHANG, MB, PhD, ANN C. TRUMBLE, PhD and MARK A. KLEBANOFF, MD, MPH

From the Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Address reprint requests to: Mary D. Overpeck, DrPH Division of Epidemiology National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health Building 6100, Room 7B03 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20892–7510 E-mail: mary_overpeck{at}nih.gov

Objective: To develop a reference for birth weight for gestational age to identify Mexican American infants born in the United States who are small or large for gestational age.

Methods: Reference percentiles were developed for Mexican American and non-Hispanic white births, using national vital statistics from 1992–1994 for Mexican Americans (n = 1,197,916) and 1994 for non-Hispanic whites (n = 2,238,457). Birth weights and gestation from the last menstrual period were taken from birth certificates. Smoothed curves were fit, using unweighted fourth-degree polynomial equations, for the tenth, 50th, and 90th percentiles by gender and parity.

Results: Mexican American infants were heavier than non-Hispanic white infants between 30 and 37 weeks’ gestation for all parities and both genders. However, at term there was consistent crossover. Non-Hispanic white infants were heavier at or after 37 through 42 weeks’ gestation, whereas the growth of Mexican American infants appeared to slow. Beginning at 37 weeks, the differences in weights of infants of primiparas increased to more than 100 g by 40 weeks; the differences were only slightly less for infants of multiparas.

Conclusion: Given differences in distribution of birth weights for gestational age between Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites, the ability to recognize fetal growth restriction (FGR) or excessive growth is questionable. These data provide a reference for Mexican Americans for clinical use and for future studies in identifying infants at risk for FGR or overgrowth.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L H Mortensen, F Diderichsen, A Arntzen, M Gissler, S Cnattingius, O Schnor, G Davey-Smith, and A-M Nybo Andersen
Social inequality in fetal growth: a comparative study of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden in the period 1981-2000
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2008; 62(4): 325 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
H. S. Nielsen, L. Mortensen, U. Nygaard, O. Schnor, O. B. Christiansen, and A.-M. N. Andersen
Brothers and Reduction of the Birth Weight of Later-born Siblings
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2008; 167(4): 480 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
R. P. Agans, N. Deeb-Sossa, and W. D. Kalsbeek
Mexican Immigrants and the Use of Cognitive Assessment Techniques in Questionnaire Development
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, May 1, 2006; 28(2): 209 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. K. Porter, S. D. Putnam, K. L. Hunting, and M. R. Riddle
The Effect of Trihalomethane and Haloacetic Acid Exposure on Fetal Growth in a Maryland County
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2005; 162(4): 334 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. C. Whitaker
Predicting Preschooler Obesity at Birth: The Role of Maternal Obesity in Early Pregnancy
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): e29 - e36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. L. Hediger, M. D. Overpeck, R. J. Kuczmarski, and W. J. Ruan
Association Between Infant Breastfeeding and Overweight in Young Children
JAMA, May 16, 2001; 285(19): 2453 - 2460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. Buekens, F. Notzon, M. Kotelchuck, and A. Wilcox
Why Do Mexican Americans Give Birth to Few Low-Birth-Weight Infants?
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2000; 152(4): 347 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. L Hediger, M. D Overpeck, W J. Ruan, and J. F Troendle
Early infant feeding and growth status of US-born infants and children aged 4-71 mo: analyses from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2000; 72(1): 159 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.