Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;93:910-914
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRIMES, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by SNIVELY, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GRIMES, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by SNIVELY, G. R.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Patients’ Understanding of Medical Risks: Implications for Genetic Counseling

DAVID A. GRIMES, MD and GILLIAN R. SNIVELY

From the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, and Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Address reprint requests to: David A. Grimes, MD Family Health International PO Box 13950 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 E-mail: dgrimes{at}fhi.org

Objective: To assess patients’ ability to compare magnitudes of Down syndrome risk at maternal ages of 35 and 40 years, expressed as rates or as proportions.

Methods: We used a self-administered, anonymous questionnaire that posed the same comparison in two different formats: 2.6 versus 8.9 per 1000 women (rates) and one in 384 versus one in 112 women (proportions). The study setting included several university-affiliated obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinics in San Francisco, California. A total of 633 women, whose primary languages were English, Spanish, or Chinese, participated. The main outcome measure was correct identification of the larger of two risks.

Results: Women were more successful with rates (463 of 633 respondents, 73%) than with proportions (353 of 633 respondents, 56%). A paired analysis, in which each woman served as her own control, found risk assessment to be significantly better with rates than with proportions (P < .001). Women with little formal education had difficulty understanding risks framed either way.

Conclusion: The traditional use of proportions to express risk in genetic counseling lacks scientific basis. Rates were easier to understand than proportions, regardless of respondents’ age, language, and education.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. S. Ancker and D. Kaufman
Rethinking Health Numeracy: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 713 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
J. Drife
Putting risk into context
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), January 1, 2007; 9(1): 42 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. P. Walker, E. A. McCarthy, A. Ugoni, A. Lee, S. Lim, and M. Permezel
Cesarean Delivery or Vaginal Birth: A Survey of Patient and Clinician Thresholds
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2007; 109(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. S. Ancker, Y. Senathirajah, R. Kukafka, and J. B. Starren
Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 608 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
B. W. Robbins
Adult Patients Understand Relative Risk Reduction Better than Number Needed to Treat
AAP Grand Rounds, March 1, 2004; 11(3): 33 - 34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Paling
Strategies to help patients understand risks
BMJ, September 27, 2003; 327(7417): 745 - 748.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Woloshin, L. M. Schwartz, and H. G. Welch
Risk Charts: Putting Cancer in Context
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 5, 2002; 94(11): 799 - 804.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L Doyal
Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparable
Heart, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 103 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A J Lloyd
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i14 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
L Doyal
Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i29 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
T Rakow
Differences in belief about likely outcomes account for differences in doctors' treatment preferences: but what accounts for the differences in belief?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i44 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S. Woloshin, L. M. Schwartz, S. Byram, B. Fischhoff, and H. G. Welch
A New Scale for Assessing Perceptions of Chance: A Validation Study
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 298 - 307.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.