Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;93:504-509
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARTMANN, K.
Right arrow Articles by GRANADOS, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HARTMANN, K.
Right arrow Articles by GRANADOS, J. L.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Cervical Dimensions and Risk of Preterm Birth: A Prospective Cohort Study

KATHERINE HARTMANN, MD, JOHN M. THORP, Jr, MD, THAD L. MCDONALD, MD, DAVID A. SAVITZ, PhD and JUAN L. GRANADOS, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Medical Center, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Objective: To examine the relation between cervical dilatation and length and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth, including its subtypes preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM).

Methods: Cervical dimensions assessed by clinical examination were recorded prospectively at 24–29 weeks’ gestation in 871 subjects with singleton pregnancies who were followed to delivery. Relative risks (RRs) of preterm birth, preterm labor, and preterm PROM were calculated for clinically distinguishable categories of cervical dilatation and length and for cervical score (length minus dilatation). Regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding. Time to delivery from baseline examination was summarized using survival analysis.

Results: There were 73 spontaneous preterm births (8.3%), 46 preterm labors and 27 cases of preterm PROM. All cervical measurements were associated with increased risks of preterm birth, with increasing abnormality more strongly predictive of risk. The adjusted RR for preterm birth with dilatation of at least 0.5 cm was 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2, 7.3); for length of 1.5 cm or less, the RR was 2.1 (95% CI 1.0, 4.5), and for cervical score less than 2.0, the RR was 2.8 (95% CI 1.4, 5.6). The association with cervical measurements was stronger for preterm PROM than for preterm labor, although precision was limited. These measurements had high specificity (93–99%) and low sensitivity (8–20%) for predicting preterm birth.

Conclusion: In asymptomatic women at 24–29 weeks’ gestation, greater cervical dilatation and shorter length were associated with increased risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, particularly preterm PROM.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. N. Simhan and S. N. Caritis
Prevention of Preterm Delivery
N. Engl. J. Med., August 2, 2007; 357(5): 477 - 487.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
V. Berghella, J. Owen, C. MacPherson, N. Yost, M. Swain, G. A. Dildy III, M. Miodovnik, O. Langer, B. Sibai, and for the National Institute of Child Health and Hum
Natural History of Cervical Funneling in Women at High Risk for Spontaneous Preterm Birth
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2007; 109(4): 863 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.