|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL COMMENTARY |
From Washington, DC.
Address reprint requests to: Morton A. Lebow, MA, 2821 29th Street NW, Washington, DC 20008
Between 1986 and 1997, nine studies on health effects of oral contraceptives were published by the New England Journal of Medicine or JAMA. All of those studies showed no increased risk of breast cancer or protective effects against ovarian and endometrial cancer. Except for one study published in 1986, the major newspapers in the United States essentially ignored these findings, and The New York Times reported on other inconclusive studies that emphasized an oral contraceptive-breast cancer link.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Kelly, J. Sheeder, and C. Stevens-Simon Teen Home Pregnancy Test Takers: More Worried or More Wishful? Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 581 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Jayo, T. C. Register, C. L. Hughes, U. Blas-Machado, E. Sulistiawati, H. Borgerink, and C. S. Johnson Effects of an Oral Contraceptive Combination With or Without Androgen on Mammary Tissues: A Study in Rats Reproductive Sciences, July 1, 2000; 7(4): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Moynihan, L. Bero, D. Ross-Degnan, D. Henry, K. Lee, J. Watkins, C. Mah, and S. B. Soumerai Coverage by the News Media of the Benefits and Risks of Medications N. Engl. J. Med., June 1, 2000; 342(22): 1645 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ansbacher and M. A. Lebow THE PILL AND THE PRESS: REPORTING RISK Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 1999; 94(2): 321 - 321. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |