Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;93:382-386
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PALADINI, D.
Right arrow Articles by MARTINELLI, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PALADINI, D.
Right arrow Articles by MARTINELLI, P.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Objective Diagnosis of Micrognathia in the Fetus: The Jaw Index

DARIO PALADINI, MD, TIZIANA MORRA, MD, ADELE TEODORO, MD, AGATA LAMBERTI, MD, FORTUNATO TREMOLATERRA, MD and PASQUALE MARTINELLI, MD

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Address reprint requests to: Dario Paladini, MD, Via Cimarosa, 69, 80127- Naples, Italy, E-mail: paladini{at}cds.unina.it

Objective: To provide an objective and accurate tool to diagnose micrognathia in the fetus.

Methods: The anteroposterior and laterolateral diameter of the mandible were measured in 262 normal fetuses between 12 and 37 weeks’ gestation and plotted against gestational age and biparietal diameter (BPD). The jaw index (anteroposterior mandibular diameter/BPD x 100) was then tested against the usual subjective method for diagnosing micrognathia, consisting of the evaluation of the facial profile, in a population of 198 malformed fetuses, 11 of which had micrognathia at necropsy or birth.

Results: The mandibular growth was linearly correlated with gestational age and BPD. Using a cutoff level of less than 23, the jaw index had a 100% sensitivity and 98.1% specificity in diagnosing micrognathia, in comparison with 72.7% and 99.2% shown by the subjective evaluation of the fetal profile. With a cutoff of 21, it yielded a positive predictive value of 100%.

Conclusion: We demonstrated the linear relationship between mandibular growth and gestational age or BPD. In addition, we validated the jaw index as an objective tool for diagnosis of micrognathia in the fetus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
I. M. Vettraino, W. Lee, R. A. Bronsteen, C. E. Harper, D. Aughton, and C. H. Comstock
Clinical Outcome of Fetuses With Sonographic Diagnosis of Isolated Micrognathia
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2003; 102(4): 801 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
W. Lee, B. McNie, T. Chaiworapongsa, G. Conoscenti, K. D. Kalache, I. M. Vettraino, R. Romero, and C. H. Comstock
Three-dimensional Ultrasonographic Presentation of Micrognathia
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2002; 21(7): 775 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.