Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;93:332-337
© 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAGETH, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by GROSSENBACHER, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RAGETH, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by GROSSENBACHER, H.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Delivery After Previous Cesarean: A Risk Evaluation

J. CHRISTOPH RAGETH, MD, CLAUDIA JUZI, MD and HEIDI GROSSENBACHER, MD FOR THE SWISS WORKING GROUP OF OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGIC INSTITUTIONS

From the Spital Limmattal, Schlieren, and Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Münsterlingen, Switzerland.

Address reprint requests to: J. Christoph Rageth, MD, Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Spital Limmattal, Urdorferstr. 100, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland, E-mail: ragethc{at}limmisp.zh.ch

Objective: To examine the risks of vaginal delivery after previous cesarean and to find criteria to help decide whether a trial of labor or an elective repeat cesarean should be preferred.

Methods: We evaluated 29,046 deliveries after previous cesarean registered in a pooled database of 457,825 deliveries used to assess quality control in gynecology and obstetrics departments in Switzerland.

Results: Among the 17,613 trial-of-labor cases logged (attempt rate 60.64%), the success rate was 73.73% (65.56% after inducing labor and 75.06% after the spontaneous onset of labor). The following complications were significantly more frequent in the previous-cesarean group: maternal febrile episodes (relative risk [RR] 2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.52, 3.05), thromboembolic events (RR 2.81; CI 2.23, 3.55), bleeding due to placenta previa during pregnancy (RR 2.06; CI 1.70, 2.49), uterine rupture (92 cases; RR 42.18; CI 31.09, 57.24), and perinatal mortality (118 cases, including six associated with uterine rupture; RR 1.33; CI 1.10, 1.62). The postcesarean group also showed a 0.28% rate of peripartum hysterectomy (81 cases; RR 6.07; CI 4.71, 7.83). There was one maternal death in the group, compared with 14 maternal deaths in the group without previous cesarean (no statistical significance). The risk of uterine rupture for patients with previous cesareans was elevated in the trial-of-labor group compared with the group without trial of labor (RR 2.07; CI 1.29, 3.30), but all other maternal risks, including peripartum hysterectomy (RR 0.36; CI 0.23, 0.56), were lower. When comparing the women having a trial of labor, the 70 with uterine rupture more often had induced labor (24.29% compared with 13.92% in the nonrupture group; P = .013), had epidural anesthesia (24.29% compared with 8.44%; P < .001), had an abnormal fetal heart rate tracing (32.86% compared with 8.53%; P < .001), and had failure to progress (21.43% compared with 7.98%; P = .001).

Conclusion: A history of cesarean delivery significantly elevates the risks for mother and child in future deliveries. Nonetheless, a trial of labor after previous cesarean is safe. Induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, failure to progress, and abnormal fetal heart rate pattern are all associated with failure of a trial of labor and uterine rupture.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. K. Daltveit, M. C. Tollanes, H. Pihlstrom, and L. M. Irgens
Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Pregnancies
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2008; 111(6): 1327 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
E. Ball and K. Hinshaw
The current management of vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), April 1, 2007; 9(2): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
W. A. Grobman, S. Gilbert, M. B. Landon, C. Y. Spong, K. J. Leveno, D. J. Rouse, M. W. Varner, A. H. Moawad, S. N. Caritis, M. Harper, et al.
Outcomes of Induction of Labor After One Prior Cesarean
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2007; 109(2): 262 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. Lieberman, E. K. Ernst, J. P. Rooks, S. Stapleton, and B. Flamm
Results of the National Study of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in Birth Centers: Reply
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2005; 105(4): 898 - 899.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. R Patel, T. J Peters, D. J Murphy, and the ALSPAC Study Team
Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944 women in England
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 353 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. B. Landon, J. C. Hauth, K. J. Leveno, C. Y. Spong, S. Leindecker, M. W. Varner, A. H. Moawad, S. N. Caritis, M. Harper, R. J. Wapner, et al.
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery
N. Engl. J. Med., December 16, 2004; 351(25): 2581 - 2589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. Lieberman, E. K. Ernst, J. P. Rooks, S. Stapleton, and B. Flamm
Results of the National Study of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in Birth Centers
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2004; 104(5): 933 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. C S Smith, J. P Pell, D. Pasupathy, and R. Dobbie
Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study
BMJ, August 14, 2004; 329(7462): 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
K. E. Kieser and T. F. Baskett
A 10-Year Population-Based Study of Uterine Rupture
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2002; 100(4): 749 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. C. S. Smith, J. P. Pell, A. D. Cameron, and R. Dobbie
Risk of Perinatal Death Associated With Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies
JAMA, May 22, 2002; 287(20): 2684 - 2690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Lydon-Rochelle, V. L. Holt, T. R. Easterling, and D. P. Martin
Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery
N. Engl. J. Med., July 5, 2001; 345(1): 3 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. F. Greene
Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section -- Is the Risk Acceptable?
N. Engl. J. Med., July 5, 2001; 345(1): 54 - 55.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. CHUNG, A. MACARIO, Y. Y. EL-SAYED, E. T. RILEY, B. DUNCAN, and M. L. DRUZIN
Cost-Effectiveness of a Trial of Labor After Previous Cesarean
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2001; 97(6): 932 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. LYDON-ROCHELLE, V. L. HOLT, T. R. EASTERLING, and D. P. MARTIN
First-Birth Cesarean and Placental Abruption or Previa at Second Birth
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2001; 97(5): 765 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. J. Ridgeway, D. L. Weyrich, and T. J. Benedetti
Fetal Heart Rate Changes Associated With Uterine Rupture
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 1997; 103(3): 506 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.