|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From The Prudential Center for Health Care Research, Atlanta, Georgia; the Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case-Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Address reprint requests to: Julie A. Gazmararian, MPH, PhD The Prudential Center for Health Care Research 2859 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 820 Atlanta, GA 30339 E-mail: julie.gazmararian{at}prudential.com
Objective: To examine the relationship between reading ability and family planning knowledge and practices among Medicaid managed care enrollees.
Methods: A total of 406 women age 1945 years enrolled in TennCare and members of Prudential HealthCare Community Plan in Memphis, Tennessee were interviewed to determine their methods of contraception, desire for additional information about contraceptives, and knowledge about the time in menstrual cycle they are at highest risk for pregnancy. Patient reading ability was assessed by an abbreviated version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy of Adults. The independent associations between reading ability, desire for additional contraceptive information, and knowledge about the highest risk time for pregnancy were assessed with logistic regression.
Results: Almost 10% of the respondents had low reading skills. Women who had used an intrauterine device, douching, rhythm, or levonorgestrel implants as methods of birth control had higher rates of low reading skills than women who used other methods of birth control. Compared with women with good reading skills, women with low reading skills were 2.2 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 4.4) more likely to want to know more about birth control methods and 4.4 times (95% CI 2.2, 9.0) more likely to have incorrect knowledge about when they were most likely to get pregnant. These relationships were significant even after controlling for age, race, and marital status.
Conclusion: Health providers and organizations that serve historically underserved populations must understand that some individuals have a low level of reading ability that limits family planning education.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. F. Brown, S. L. Ettner, J. Piette, M. Weinberger, E. Gregg, M. F. Shapiro, A. J. Karter, M. Safford, B. Waitzfelder, P. A. Prata, et al. Socioeconomic Position and Health among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature Epidemiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 63 - 77. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H S Mitchell and E Stephens Contraception choice for HIV positive women Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2004; 80(3): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J D Fortenberry, M M McFarlane, M Hennessy, S S Bull, D M Grimley, J St Lawrence, B P Stoner, and N VanDevanter Relation of health literacy to gonorrhoea related care Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2001; 77(3): 206 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. GAZMARARIAN, T. L. ARRINGTON, C. M. BAILEY, K. S. SCHWARZ, and J. P. KOPLAN Prenatal Care for Low-Income Women Enrolled in a Managed-Care Organization Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 1999; 94(2): 177 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |