Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1998;92:962-966
© 1998 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Modesitt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Le, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Modesitt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Le, L

Articles

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia III: occult cancer and the impact of margin status on recurrence

SC Modesitt, AB Waters, L Walton, Fowler WC Jr, and L Van Le

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of margin status on disease recurrence and the incidence of occult cancer in women diagnosed with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) III and treated with surgical excision. METHODS: Between 1989 and 1995, 73 women were diagnosed preoperatively with VIN III by vulvar biopsy and were treated with surgical resection. Patients were examined postoperatively, and recurrence was diagnosed when a biopsy of suspicious lesions confirmed VIN III. RESULTS: The mean age was 45 years; 81% of the patients were white, and 18% were black. Eighty-two percent of the women had used tobacco, 56% had prior cervical dysplasia, and 37% had prior genital warts. An underlying squamous vulvar cancer was found in 22% of patients at initial treatment for VIN III. Fifty-nine women had follow-up of at least 7 months. Of these, 66% (39 of 59) had positive surgical margins, 31% (18 of 59) had negative margins and 3% had unknown margins (two of 59). With positive margins, 46% (18 of 39) suffered recurrent disease; with negative margins, only 17% (three of 18) had recurrent disease (P = .03). Multifocal disease and a history of genital warts also correlated with VIN III recurrence (P = .03 for both). CONCLUSION: A significant number of women diagnosed initially with VIN III on a vulvar biopsy harbored occult vulvar cancer. Recurrences were almost threefold higher when margins were positive for residual VIN III. We conclude that surgical resection is an appropriate method of treatment of VIN III for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. van Seters, M. van Beurden, F. J.W. ten Kate, I. Beckmann, P. C. Ewing, M. J.C. Eijkemans, M. J. Kagie, C. J.M. Meijer, N. K. Aaronson, A. KleinJan, et al.
Treatment of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia with Topical Imiquimod
N. Engl. J. Med., April 3, 2008; 358(14): 1465 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
F. B. Stehman and K. Y. Look
Carcinoma of the vulva.
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2006; 107(3): 719 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
R. W. Jones, D. M. Rowan, and A. W. Stewart
Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Aspects of the Natural History and Outcome in 405 Women
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2005; 106(6): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. J. Davidson, C. M. Boswell, P. Sehr, M. Pawlita, A. E. Tomlinson, R. J. McVey, J. Dobson, J. St. C. Roberts, J. Hickling, H. C. Kitchener, et al.
Immunological and Clinical Responses in Women with Vulval Intraepithelial Neoplasia Vaccinated with a Vaccinia Virus Encoding Human Papillomavirus 16/18 Oncoproteins
Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 6032 - 6041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. A. Rettenmaier, S. C. Modesitt, and L. Van Le
VULVAR INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA III: OCCULT CANCER AND THE IMPACT OF MARGIN STATUS ON RECURRENCE
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 1999; 93(4): 633 - 634.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.