Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1998;92:94-97
© 1998 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearl, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chalas, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearl, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chalas, E

Articles

A randomized controlled trial of early postoperative feeding in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery

ML Pearl, FA Valea, M Fischer, L Mahler, and E Chalas

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early oral feeding after intra-abdominal surgery in gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: During a 1-year period, 200 gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of early compared with traditional oral postoperative feeding. Patients allocated to early postoperative oral feeding began a clear liquid diet on the first postoperative day and then advanced to a regular diet as tolerated. Patients allocated to traditional postoperative oral feeding received nothing by mouth until return of bowel function (defined as the passage of flatus in the absence of vomiting or abdominal distention), then began a clear liquid diet, and advanced to a regular diet as tolerated. RESULTS: Age, case distribution, surgery length, blood loss, and first passage of flatus were similar in the early and traditional feeding groups. Significantly more patients in the early group developed nausea. Despite this, the incidence of vomiting, abdominal distention, incidence and duration of nasogastric tube use, and percentage of patients who tolerated clear liquid and regular diets on the first attempt were comparable in both groups. Time to development of bowel sounds, time to initiation of clear liquid and regular diets, and hospital stay were significantly longer in the traditional group. Major complications (eg, pneumonia, atelectasis, and wound complications) and febrile morbidity occurred equally in both groups. There were no known anastamotic complications or aspirations in either group. Postoperative changes in hematologic indices and electrolytes were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative feeding in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery is safe and well tolerated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. L. Pearl, M. Frandina, L. Mahler, F. A. Valea, P. A. DiSilvestro, and E. Chalas
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Regular Diet as the First Meal in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Intraabdominal Surgery
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2002; 100(2): 230 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. L. Pearl, D. L. McCauley, J. Thompson, L. Mahler, F. A. Valea, and E. Chalas
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Oral Analgesia in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Intra-Abdominal Surgery
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2002; 99(5): 704 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. L. M. MACMILLAN, D. KAMMERER-DOAK, R. G. ROGERS, and K. M. PARKER
Early Feeding and the Incidence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Major Gynecologic Surgery
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2000; 96(4): 604 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.