Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1998;91:909-916
© 1998 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bowdler, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bowdler, N

Articles

Predictors of neonatal resuscitation, low Apgar scores, and umbilical artery pH among growth-restricted neonates

BT Levy, JD Dawson, PP Toth, and N Bowdler

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with poorer immediate neonatal outcomes among growth-restricted neonates. METHODS: Records of all 530 growth-restricted neonates born between January 1989 and February 1995 were reviewed. Outcomes included resuscitation measures, Apgar scores, and umbilical blood gas values. Neonates were assigned to one of six anesthetic groups, and outcomes were compared. Predictors of poorer outcomes were examined using logistic and linear regression. RESULTS: Neonates exposed to general anesthesia were more likely to be intubated (37.9% versus 4.1%, P < .001, Pearson chi2) and had lower mean 1- (4.0 versus 7.0) and 5-minute (6.5 versus 8.4) Apgar scores (P < .01, Scheffe) than those in all other anesthetic groups. They also had significantly lower umbilical artery (UA) pH values than neonates who received nalbuphine, epidural, or no anesthesia (7.21 versus 7.28, 7.26, 7.29, respectively; P < .01, Scheffe). Factors that significantly and independently predicted intubation among all neonates included exposure to general anesthesia (odds ratio [OR] 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 8.9) and lower infant weight (OR 10.1 per kg decrease; CI 5.1, 20). Factors predicting UA pH at most 7.15 included preeclampsia (OR 3.0; CI 1.5, 5.9) and older maternal age (OR 1.3 per 5 years; CI 1.02, 1.64); vertex delivery (OR 0.5; CI 0.2, 0.9) was protective. Factors predicting a 5-minute Apgar less than 7 were meconium (OR 1.5 per category going from none to terminal to light to heavy; CI 1.04, 2.3), general anesthesia (OR 6.9; CI 2.6, 18.2), lower infant weight (OR 16.5 per kg decrease; CI 7.8, 34.5), and vaginal breech delivery (OR 7.0; CI 1.8, 28.6); cesarean delivery (OR 0.2; CI 0.08, 0.66) was protective. Spontaneous vertex delivery raised the UA pH, and preeclampsia, amnioinfusion, breech delivery, and general anesthesia significantly and independently lowered the UA pH among all neonates. For infants delivered by cesarean, "fetal distress," preeclampsia, previous spontaneous abortion, failed forceps use, and nalbuphine significantly and independently predicted lower UA pH. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for poorer immediate neonatal outcomes among growth-restricted neonates include preeclampsia, fetal distress, breech delivery, forceps use, nalbuphine during labor, lower infant weight, and general anesthesia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
W. E. Benitz and M. L. Druzin
Drugs That Affect Neonatal Resuscitation
NeoReviews, April 1, 2005; 6(4): e189 - e195.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. Littleford
Effects on the fetus and newborn of maternal analgesia and anesthesia: a review: [Les effets de l'analgesie et de l'anesthesie de la mere sur le foetus et le nouveau-ne: une revue]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(6): 586 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.