Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1998;91:878-884
© 1998 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schieve, L.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schieve, L.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, K.

Articles

An empiric evaluation of the Institute of Medicine's pregnancy weight gain guidelines by race

LA Schieve, ME Cogswell, and KS Scanlon

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between pregnancy weight gain outside and within ranges recommended by the Institute of Medicine and birth weight by both prepregnant body mass index (BMI) and race-ethnicity. METHODS: Mean birth weight and incidence of term low birth weight (LBW, less than 2500 g) and high birth weight (more than 4500 g) were compared across BMI-pregnancy weight gain-race-ethnicity strata. Subjects were 173,066 white, black, and Hispanic low-income pregnant women attending prenatal nutrition programs between 1990 and 1993. RESULTS: Among low and average BMI women (all race-ethnicity groups), weight gain within Institute of Medicine ranges resulted in significant LBW reductions; further LBW reductions at gains beyond Institute of Medicine ranges were offset by increasing high birth weight risk. Among women of high and obese BMI, LBW trends were less pronounced; thus, the benefit of gaining within the Institute of Medicine range was less apparent. Although blacks in every BMI-weight gain category had lower mean birth weights than white women, gaining in the upper end of the Institute of Medicine ranges did not provide a consistent LBW reduction for black women; adjusted LBW odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for gains in the upper relative to the lower half of the Institute of Medicine range were 1.3 (0.8, 2.1), 0.7 (0.5, 1.03), 0.3 (0.2, 0.8), and 1.3 (0.7, 2.5) for black women of low, average, high, and obese BMI, respectively. CONCLUSION: Institute of Medicine pregnancy weight gain ranges recommended for low and average BMI women appear reasonable, but recommendations for high and obese BMI women require further evaluation. The recommendation that black women in all BMI groups strive for gains toward the upper ends of the ranges is not supported clearly by these data.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. W. Kiel, E. A. Dodson, R. Artal, T. K. Boehmer, and T. L. Leet
Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes in Obese Women: How Much Is Enough?
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2007; 110(4): 752 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. I. Cedergren
Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Body Mass Index Categories
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2007; 110(4): 759 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
N. E. Stotland, A. B. Caughey, M. Lahiff, and B. Abrams
Weight Gain and Spontaneous Preterm Birth: The Role of Race or Ethnicity and Previous Preterm Birth
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2006; 108(6): 1448 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. N. Nielsen, K. O O'Brien, F. R Witter, S.-C. Chang, J. Mancini, M. S. Nathanson, and L. E Caulfield
High gestational weight gain does not improve birth weight in a cohort of African American adolescents
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2006; 84(1): 183 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. A. Schieve, C. Ferre, H. B. Peterson, M. Macaluso, M. A. Reynolds, and V. C. Wright
Perinatal Outcome Among Singleton Infants Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2004; 103(6): 1144 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. C. Rhodes, K. C. Schoendorf, and J. D. Parker
Contribution of Excess Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Macrosomia to the Cesarean Delivery Rate, 1990-2000
Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1181 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
B. L. Rooney and C. W. Schauberger
Excess Pregnancy Weight Gain and Long-Term Obesity: One Decade Later
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2002; 100(2): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. S. KAISER and R. S. KIRBY
Obesity as a Risk Factor for Cesarean in a Low-Risk Population
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2001; 97(1): 39 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. E. COGSWELL, K. S. SCANLON, S. B. FEIN, and L. A. SCHIEVE
Medically Advised, Mother's Personal Target, and Actual Weight Gain During Pregnancy
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 1999; 94(4): 616 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.