|
|
||||||||
Articles |
OBJECTIVE: Compare urogenital hiatus size in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: The sagittal and transverse urogenital hiatus diameters were measured and hiatus area calculated in 300 women whose support was scored using a modified Baden system. RESULTS: In women with normal support and without prior surgery, hiatus area was 5.4 cm2 (+/-1.71 standard deviation [SD], n = 197). In women with uncorrected clinical prolapse (grade 2-3), the area of the hiatus was enlarged (9.6 cm2 +/- 3.97, n = 34, P < .05) and became larger with progressive prolapse (grade 0, 5.4 cm2 +/- 1.71, n = 197; grade 1, 7.3 cm2 +/- 1.91, n = 27; grade 2, 8.3 cm2 +/- 2.45, n = 18; grade 3, 11.0 cm2 +/- 4.90, n = 16). When matched for age and parity, prolapse patients had a larger hiatus than normal women. Women with recurrent prolapse had a larger hiatus than cured women (13.3 cm2 +/- 3.86, n = 8 compared with 8.1 cm2 +/- 2.44, n = 16, P < .05) or women with recurrence after one operation (8.9 cm2 +/- 1.77, n = 18, P < .05). Hiatus size in patients surgically cured (8.3 cm2 +/- 2.44, n = 16) did not return to normal (5.4 cm2 +/- 1.71, n = 197, P < .05). Increasing area of the hiatus was correlated with an increase in anterior-posterior diameter (r2 = 0.9, P < .05), was less attributable to increased transverse diameter (r2 = 0.6, P < .05), and was not related to thickness of the perineal body (r2 = 0.0, P > .05). CONCLUSION: Increasing pelvic organ prolapse is associated with increasing urogenital hiatus size; the hiatus is larger after several failed operations than after successful surgery or single failure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. M. Law and J. R. Fielding MRI of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Review Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6_Supplement): S45 - S53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jones, L. Yang, J. L. Lowder, L. Meyn, R. Ellison, H. M. Zyczynski, P. Moalli, and T. Lee Effect of Pessary Use on Genital Hiatus Measurements in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2008; 112(3): 630 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Kruger, S. W. Heap, B. A. Murphy, and H. P. Dietz Pelvic Floor Function in Nulliparous Women Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Leeman, R. G. Rogers, B. Greulich, and L. L. Albers Do Unsutured Second-Degree Perineal Lacerations Affect Postpartum Functional Outcomes? J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2007; 20(5): 451 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-C. Lien, B. Mooney, J. O. L. DeLancey, and J. A. Ashton-Miller Levator Ani Muscle Stretch Induced by Simulated Vaginal Birth Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2004; 103(1): 31 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kearney and J. O. L. DeLancey Selecting Suspension Points and Excising the Vagina During Michigan Four-Wall Sacrospinous Suspension Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2003; 101(2): 325 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goh, S. Halligan, G. Kaplan, J. C. Healy, and C. I. Bartram Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor in Asymptomatic Subjects Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 661 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Kelvin, D. D. T. Maglinte, D. S. Hale, and J. T. Benson Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Comparison of Triphasic Dynamic MR Imaging and Triphasic Fluoroscopic Cystocolpoproctography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |