Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1997;89:434-438
© 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, T.

Articles

Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetal spine

DD Johnson, DH Pretorius, M Riccabona, NE Budorick, and TR Nelson

OBJECTIVE: To describe normal fetal spinal anatomy displayed by three-dimensional ultrasound and to determine whether three-dimensional ultrasound improves visualization of specific spinal defects. METHODS: Fetuses (n = 28) (16 normal and 12 abnormal) were examined on standard two- and three-dimensional sonographic equipment. RESULTS: In 15 of 16 normal fetuses, the spine was visualized at least from the upper thoracic area to the lower sacrum in a single three-dimensional image, and in 14 normal fetuses continuity of the ribs and spine was depicted. Neural tube defects were identified on both two- and three-dimensional ultrasounds; however, three-dimensional ultrasound displayed the level of the defect more accurately in three of the five cases. Scoliosis was recognized easily on a single three-dimensional rendered image, whereas several two-dimensional redered image, whereas several two-dimensional images were needed for the examiner mentally to reconstruct the scoliosis. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional ultrasound may become an important tool for imaging of the fetal spine. Additional studies are necessary to determine the efficacy and cost effectiveness of this technology. However, our preliminary data suggest that presentation of the spine as a continuous structure rather than in independent two-dimensional views makes visualization of the spatial relationship of the spinal anatomy and adjacent structures easier. The ability to review the volume data using techniques not available on two-dimensional ultrasound may enable physicians to determine the extent of neural tube defects with more accuracy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Riccabona, A. Pilhatsch, A. Haberlik, and E. Ring
Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography-Based Virtual Cystoscopy of the Pediatric Urinary Bladder: A Preliminary Report on Feasibility and Potential Value
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2008; 27(10): 1453 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Y. Zalel, O. Lehavi, O. Aizenstein, and R. Achiron
Development of the fetal spinal cord: time of ascendance of the normal conus medullaris as detected by sonography.
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2006; 25(11): 1397 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. F. Goncalves, J. K. Nien, J. Espinoza, J. P. Kusanovic, W. Lee, B. Swope, E. Soto, M. C. Treadwell, and R. Romero
What Does 2-Dimensional Imaging Add to 3- and 4-Dimensional Obstetric Ultrasonography?
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2006; 25(6): 691 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. I. Sallout, D. A. D'Agostini, and D. H. Pretorius
Prenatal Diagnosis of Spondylocostal Dysostosis With 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2006; 25(4): 539 - 543.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. F. Goncalves, W. Lee, J. Espinoza, and R. Romero
Three- and 4-Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetric Practice: Does It Help?
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1599 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. S. Aaronson, M. Hernanz-Schulman, J. P. Bruner, G. W. Reed, and N. B. Tulipan
Myelomeningocele: Prenatal Evaluation—Comparison between Transabdominal US and MR Imaging
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 839 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
W. Lee, T. Chaiworapongsa, R. Romero, R. Williams, B. McNie, A. Johnson, M. Treadwell, and C. H. Comstock
A Diagnostic Approach for the Evaluation of Spina Bifida by Three-dimensional Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2002; 21(6): 619 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. V. Garjian, D. H. Pretorius, N. E. Budorick, C. J. Cantrell, D. D. Johnson, and T. R. Nelson
Fetal Skeletal Dysplasia: Three-dimensional US-Initial Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 717 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.