Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;88:211-215
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malone, F.
Right arrow Articles by D'Alton, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malone, F.
Right arrow Articles by D'Alton, M.

Articles

Prolonged labor in nulliparas: lessons from the active management of labor

FD Malone, M Geary, D Chelmow, J Stronge, P Boylan, and ME D'Alton

OBJECTIVE. To define factors causing prolonged labor in nulliparous women undergoing active management of labor. METHODS. We included all nulliparas delivered during 1990-1994 with spontaneous onset of labor lasting more than 12 hours, singleton gestation, cephalic presentation, and labor at greater than 37 weeks. Each patient was matched with the next nulliparous woman who delivered with a labor lasting less than 12 hours and who fulfilled the same inclusion criteria. Subjects were managed according to the previously described active management of labor protocol from The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin. RESULTS. In the 5-year period, 9018 nulliparas met inclusion criteria, with 147 (1.6%) having prolonged labor. Prolonged labor was due to inefficient uterine action in 65%, persistent occipitoposterior position in 24%, and cephalopelvic disproportion in 11% of cases. Univariate analysis showed statistically significant (P < .05) differences in maternal body mass index, cervical dilation on admission, oxytocin use, epidural use, placement of epidural at less than 2 cm of dilation, and birth weight between these study groups. On multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis, the following were significant independent predictors for having a prolonged labor (odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals presented): 3.1 (1.3-7.3) for cervical dilation less than 2 cm on admission, 42.7 (7.5-242.0) for early epidural placement, 5.1 (1.9-13.7) for epidural placement at greater than or equal to 2 cm, and 10.2 (3.6-29.4) for birth weight greater than 4000 g. CONCLUSION. Less-advanced cervical dilation on admission and epidural use, especially when placed early, are strongly associated with prolonged labor.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. S. MASLOW and A. L. SWEENY
Elective Induction of Labor as a Risk Factor for Cesarean Delivery Among Low-Risk Women at Term
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2000; 95(6): 917 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.