Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;88:150-154
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trussell, J
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trussell, J
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, G

Articles

The Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception: how long after the morning after?

J Trussell, C Ellertson, and G Rodriguez

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether failure of the Yuzpe method of emergency contraception (which involves taking a higher than usual dose of ordinary combined oral contraceptives within 72 hours after unprotected intercourse, with a second dose taken 12 hours later) depends on the interval between intercourse and treatment. DATA SOURCES: We searched the literature for studies in which investigators separately reported both the number of women treated with the Yuzpe regimen and the resulting pregnancies when treatment was started on the first, second, and third days after unprotected intercourse. Searches of the electronic data bases MEDLINE, POPLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS were supplemented by scrutiny of the bibliographies of all papers identified through the electronic search. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We identified nine published studies that present the number of women treated and outcome of treatment by time since unprotected intercourse. We included all nine studies in our analysis. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Differences in failure rates by time of treatment adjusted for study-site effects were analyzed using logistic regression. We found no significant differences in failure rates when therapy was started on the first, second, or third day after unprotected intercourse. The large sample size ensured a power of 76% to reject the null hypothesis of equal failure rates when the odds of failure on the third day are twice those on the first and second days. CONCLUSION: Our results have two clinical implications. First, insistence on taking the first dose as soon as possible may be counterproductive in circumstances when taking the second dose 12 hours later would be difficult. Second, clinical protocols that deny treatment after 72 hours may be excessively restrictive, particularly if the alternative of emergency insertion of a copper intrauterine device is not immediately available or appropriate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Westhoff
Emergency Contraception
N. Engl. J. Med., November 6, 2003; 349(19): 1830 - 1835.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. A. Grimes and E. G. Raymond
Emergency Contraception
Ann Intern Med, August 6, 2002; 137(3): 180 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Emergency Contraception: It's Not Too Late
Journal Watch Women's Health, March 1, 1999; 1999(301): 20 - 20.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.