Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;88:128-132
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lobel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sand, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lobel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sand, P.

Articles

The empty supine stress test as a predictor of intrinsic urethral sphincter dysfunction

RW Lobel and PK Sand

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of a proposed test for intrinsic urethral sphincter dysfunction. METHODS: Subjects were included in the study if they had complaints of incontinence, did not have substantial pelvic prolapse, and had undergone multichannel urodynamic testing. The initial evaluation involved uroflowmetry, catheterized residual urine, history, urogenital examination, and a cough stress test within 20 minutes after catheterization. Standardized multichannel urodynamic testing was performed at a follow-up appointment. Test indices were calculated based on the result of the empty supine stress test, the presence of genuine stress incontinence, and maximum urethral closure pressures. RESULTS: Three hundred four women met the inclusion criteria; 124 had a positive empty supine stress test and 180 had a negative test. Genuine stress incontinence was diagnosed in 238 subjects. A positive empty supine stress test was found to have 70% sensitivity and 90% negative predictive value for detecting very low urethral closure pressures, and 98% positive predictive value for genuine stress incontinence; in low-risk populations, the test had 95% negative predictive value for excluding urethral dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The empty supine stress test is easy to perform, inexpensive, and without significant risk. By itself, a positive empty supine stress test is essentially diagnostic for genuine stress incontinence, and in combination with a fixed urethra, it is diagnostic for intrinsic urethral sphincter dysfunction. In low-prevalence populations, a negative test reliably excludes the presence of intrinsic urethral sphincter dysfunction. However, for high-prevalence and referral populations, the low predictive values of the test limit its usefulness.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. M. Holroyd-Leduc, C. Tannenbaum, K. E. Thorpe, and S. E. Straus
What Type of Urinary Incontinence Does This Woman Have?
JAMA, March 26, 2008; 299(12): 1446 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. A. ARYA, D. L. MYERS, and N. D. JACKSON
Office Screening Test for Intrinsic Urethral Sphincter Deficiency: Pediatric Foley Catheter Test
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2001; 97(6): 885 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.