Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;88:119-122
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vincent RD,
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vincent RD, , Jr
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R.

Articles

Postpartum tubal ligation after pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia or gestational hypertension

Vincent RD Jr and RW Martin

OBJECTIVE: To determine the anesthetic and surgical morbidity associated with postpartum tubal ligation after pregnancy complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension. METHODS: Preoperative hemodynamic measurements, laboratory results, choice of anesthetic technique, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and postoperative morbidity were compared in 53 women with pregnancy-induced hypertension (hypertensive group) and 53 controls who underwent postpartum tubal ligation between October 1992 and November 1995. We used a retrospective case-control design. RESULTS: Preoperative mean blood pressure (BP) measurements ( +/- standard deviation) were greater in hypertensive women than in controls (158 +/- 22/91 +/- 12 versus 126 +/- 13/71 +/- 10 mmHg; P < .001). Among women given spinal anesthetics for tubal ligation, the minimum intraoperative systolic BP was significantly lower in controls than in hypertensive women (P < .05). However, the maximum percentage decrease in systolic BP was greater in hypertensive women than in controls (33 +/- 14 versus 22 +/- 10%; P < .05). Only one patient in each group developed intraoperative hypertension. The percentage of patients discharged later than the first postoperative day was greater in hypertensive women than in controls (23 versus 8%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: The lack of profound hemodynamic responses during spinal or general anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation supports the continued use of this procedure in selected women with pregnancy-induced hypertension.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. A. Bucklin and C. V. Smith
Postpartum Tubal Ligation: Safety, Timing, and Other Implications for Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1269 - 1269.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.