Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;88:10-13
© 1996 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, B
Right arrow Articles by Garite, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, B
Right arrow Articles by Garite, T

Articles

Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic mothers

B Cohen, S Penning, C Major, D Ansley, M Porto, and T Garite

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the difference between the abdominal diameter and biparietal diameter (AD-BPD difference), as measured by ultrasound examination, predicts shoulder dystocia in borderline macrosomic infants of diabetic mothers. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of births occurring from January 1990 through June 1995. Eligibility requirements included diabetic pregnancy, ultrasound examination within 2 weeks of delivery, estimated fetal weight of 3800-4200 g, and vaginal delivery. The mean AD-BPD difference was compared in normal deliveries and those complicated by shoulder dystocia, using the Student t test and by multiple regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to determine if an AD-BPD cutoff value could be used clinically to predict shoulder dystocia. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients, six with dystocia, were eligible for the study. The mean AD-BPD differences for those with and without shoulder dystocia were 3.1 and 2.6 cm, respectively, a statistically significant difference (P = .05). Comparing the groups with and without shoulder dystocia, no significant differences could be found in mean age, parity, weight, birth weight, or gestational age. Shoulder dystocia occurred in six of 20 patients (30%) in whom the AD-BPD difference was at least 2.6 cm but in none of 11 patients in whom it was less than 2.6 cm, also a statistically significant difference (P = .05). CONCLUSION: The AD-BPD difference was greater in borderline macrosomic fetuses of diabetic mothers who experienced shoulder dystocia than in those who had uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. Applying an AD-BPD cutoff value of 2.6 cm to this population prospectively would have provided excellent sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value in identifying those fetuses at high risk for birth injury.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
R. S. Miller, P. C. Devine, and E. B. Johnson
Sonographic Fetal Asymmetry Predicts Shoulder Dystocia
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1523 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. L. Conway
Obstetric Management in Gestational Diabetes
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(Supplement_2): S175 - S179.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. JAZAYERI, J. A. HEFFRON, R. PHILLIPS, and W. N. SPELLACY
Macrosomia Prediction Using Ultrasound Fetal Abdominal Circumference of 35 Centimeters or More
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 1999; 93(4): 523 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.